Re: distributed-net-pproxy

2004-08-19 Thread Stephen Stafford
Adeodato Simó wrote: > There was a little discussion about distributed-net-pproxy last month: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/07/msg00040.html > > To make it easier to sbd. reading the removal bug (CCed), e.g. a > ftpmaster, this is the link for this second thread: > > ht

Re: distributed-net-pproxy

2004-08-09 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Matthew Palmer [Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:23:17 +1000]: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > distributed-net-pproxy should be deleted from Debian; see Bug 241112. > > Can we make this happen? (I'm a little hesitant about the right > > procedure for these kinds of

Re: distributed-net-pproxy

2004-08-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The procedure I've observed is that someone files a bug on ftp.debian.org > asking for removal, ftpmasters reassigns the bug to qa.debian.org, and then > tbm reassigns it back to ftp.debian.org with a rationale. Ok, I'll reassign the existing thing to

Re: distributed-net-pproxy

2004-08-09 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > distributed-net-pproxy should be deleted from Debian; see Bug 241112. > Can we make this happen? (I'm a little hesitant about the right > procedure for these kinds of cases; is it ok for me to simply queue > the appropriate bug