fant == Frank Küster [2009-8-21]
fant Davide G. M. Salvetti sa...@debian.org wrote:
fant But I also think that your style of working is not encouraging for
fant collaborators. You actually *do* accept patches, sometimes as-is,
fant sometimes you take them as inspiration, but solve the issue
AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-19]
AT Considering the facts presented above asking people for sending
AT patches is a bit weak arguing (well not even so weak as the
AT packaging work where we can not see a visible sign in the changelog
AT since two years).
Dear Andreas,
actually I am not
Davide G. M. Salvetti sa...@debian.org wrote:
The package is comaintained, and qualified people are always welcome
(Frank Küster being the most prominent, looking to past history).
One who has not much time to spend ATM, though. And I must admit that
your packaging style is a hindrance, too:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:22:17AM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
actually I am not presenting any argument.
Your arguing actually was:
... you can start by studying how the software
is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
as a response to a patch which was
AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-20]
AT Your arguing actually was:
DGMS ... you can start by studying how the software
DGMS is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
AT as a response to a patch which was provided inside #539749. I'd
AT call this weak arguing (at best).
Then I
Davide G. M. Salvetti sa...@debian.org wrote:
AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-20]
AT Your arguing actually was:
DGMS ... you can start by studying how the software
DGMS is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
AT as a response to a patch which was provided inside
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
patches myself and build local packages if I want to use recent
high popcon software like Emacs 23 who are not even be able to say
sorry for not beeing active to potential helpers.
What I was considering myself (years ago) was to create a package
Hi
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Davide G. M. Salvettisa...@debian.org wrote:
please, stand corrected, as I intend to keep auctex maintenance. Thank
you for your offer of help, you can start by studying how the software
is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca (13/08/2009):
I guess two of the NMUs are internationalization issues, so I don't
really how indicative they are of lack of maintanence. On the other
hand, the package has 22 lintian warnings, and sits at policy 3.7.2,
which makes it likely to have some RC bugs.
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)]
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca (13/08/2009):
I guess two of the NMUs are internationalization issues, so I don't
really how indicative they are of lack of maintanence. On the other
hand, the package has 22 lintian warnings, and sits at
DB == David Bremner [2009-8-14]
[...]
DB I don't think that any of this changes my major point, which is that
DB the package at least seems abandoned by its maintainer(s). I would
DB be quite happy to be corrected on this point.
Hi,
please, stand corrected, as I intend to keep auctex
Hi:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Davide G. M. Salvettisa...@debian.org wrote:
DB == David Bremner [2009-8-14]
[...]
DB I don't think that any of this changes my major point, which is that
DB the package at least seems abandoned by its maintainer(s). I would
DB be quite happy to be
Since the last maintainer upload, there have been 3 (going on 4) NMUs
and two new upstream versions.
I guess two of the NMUs are internationalization issues, so I don't
really how indicative they are of lack of maintanence. On the other
hand, the package has 22 lintian warnings, and sits at
13 matches
Mail list logo
