Re: UDD data -> MySQL - Was: Re: Archiving UDD data : FLOSSMole ?

2009-06-17 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:22:10PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > I think it depends the kind of analysis people might want to do for > their research in mining the Debian metadata that would be archived in > FLOSSMole, maybe these package versions wouldn't be needed, so strings > without the full

Re: UDD data -> MySQL - Was: Re: Archiving UDD data : FLOSSMole ?

2009-06-16 Thread Olivier Berger
Le mardi 16 juin 2009 à 12:50 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > UDD has some parts that are Postgres specific, in particular it uses > > the Postgres extension mechanism to internalize Debian version > > comparison so that it ca

Re: UDD data -> MySQL - Was: Re: Archiving UDD data : FLOSSMole ?

2009-06-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > UDD has some parts that are Postgres specific, in particular it uses > the Postgres extension mechanism to internalize Debian version > comparison so that it can be exploited in queries. In the beginning, > the internalization wa

Re: UDD data -> MySQL - Was: Re: Archiving UDD data : FLOSSMole ?

2009-06-16 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:59:21PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > Actually, something obvious seems to render things a bit difficult at > first sight : UDD is in PostGres, and FLOSSMole uses MySQL. > > We're discussing some options on the ossmole-discuss list to overcome > this difficulty. > > My

UDD data -> MySQL - Was: Re: Archiving UDD data : FLOSSMole ?

2009-06-10 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le mardi 09 juin 2009 à 16:55 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit : > It's very likely then, that UDD will start being collected by the > FLOSSMole team in the future. > Actually, something obvious seems to render things a bit difficult at first sight : UDD is in PostGres, and FLOSSMole uses MySQ