Re: debcheck.php navbar rendering

2018-04-24 Thread Fabian Bmn
Just before the tag, we could use a tag and vice versa.. Just a blind guess.. Regards, Fabian 2018-04-24 7:56 GMT+02:00 Ferenc Wágner : > Dear QA Team, > > Looking at https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php, the top and bottom of the > vertical navigation bar on the left side renders

debcheck.php navbar rendering

2018-04-23 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Dear QA Team, Looking at https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php, the top and bottom of the vertical navigation bar on the left side renders strange (in Firefox): Just in case you haven't noticed it yet... -- Regards, Feri

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-22 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/21/2016 11:36 PM, Iustin Pop wrote: > On 2016-05-11 11:18:53, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: - "Binary Package: libprotobuf-lite9v5: Package is optional and has a Conflicts on libprotobuf-lite9 which is optional"; the problem is

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-21 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2016-05-11 11:18:53, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > > - "Binary Package: libprotobuf-lite9v5: Package is optional and has a > > > Conflicts on libprotobuf-lite9 which is optional"; the problem is that > > > it libprotobuf-lite9v5 not only

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-21 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2016-05-11 12:47:58, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Iustin Pop , 2016-05-09, 22:29: > > I'm looking at > > https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=protobuf, and > > both issues I see listed seem false positives: > > > > - "Package has a D

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > - "Binary Package: libprotobuf-lite9v5: Package is optional and has a > > Conflicts on libprotobuf-lite9 which is optional"; the problem is that > > it libprotobuf-lite9v5 not only conflicts, but also _replaces_ > > libprotobuf-lite9,

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Iustin Pop , 2016-05-09, 22:29: I'm looking at https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=protobuf, and both issues I see listed seem false positives: - "Package has a Depends on python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~) which cannot be satisfied on $all_arches"; this i

Re: Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Iustin Pop wrote: > Let me know if I should be reporting these as bugs against some package, > or if they are not problems. These are known problems. If anyone would like to help finish up the attached patch to make debcheck use libdpkg-perl for parsing, that woul

Package priority issues on qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-05-09 Thread Iustin Pop
Hi, Not sure if this is the right place, but the page footer says so. I'm looking at https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=protobuf, and both issues I see listed seem false positives: - "Package has a Depends on python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~) which cannot

Bug#821775: dose: add some features from qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-04-19 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! Thanks for filing this. On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:15:37 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: dose > the https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php seem to be not much maintained > and ar

Bug#821775: dose: add some features from qa.debian.org/debcheck.php

2016-04-19 Thread Johannes Schauer
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: dose Hi, the https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php seem to be not much maintained and are missing a number of features with respect to dependency resolution (like build profiles, architecture qualifiers

Re: debcheck.php

2005-01-23 Thread Andreas Barth
* Nikita V. Youshchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050123 11:50]: > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libetpan states > that there is a problem with my package (libetpan-dev), because it is > optional and depends on extra libdb4.2-dev. > > However, in fact li

Re: debcheck.php

2005-01-23 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:46:14PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > Hello. > > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libetpan states > that there is a problem with my package (libetpan-dev), because it is > optional and depends on extra libdb4.2-dev. &g

debcheck.php

2005-01-23 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libetpan states that there is a problem with my package (libetpan-dev), because it is optional and depends on extra libdb4.2-dev. However, in fact libdb4.2-dev is extra, as control file in binary deb states: Package: libetpan

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-15 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:56:20AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) > > > > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386. > > > > > > > > Ah :) > > > > > > > > $arch = 'i386';

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:56:20AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) > > > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386. > > > > > > Ah :) > > > > > > $arch = 'i386'; > > > $deps_arch = 'hurd-i386' > > > ignore unless $de

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:15:38AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) > > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386. > > > > Ah :) > > > > $arch = 'i386'; > > $deps_arch = 'hurd-

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:15:38AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386. > > Ah :) > > $arch = 'i386'; > $deps_arch = 'hurd-i386' > ignore unless $deps_arch =~ $arch; > > Looks lik

Bug#219753: marked as done (http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps)

2003-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:12:40 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-13 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=glibc shows > the following: > > BuildDepends > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 2002060

Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-08 Thread Jeff Bailey
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=glibc shows the following: BuildDepends Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386.

Processed: Re: Bug#159058: qa.debian.org: debcheck.php doesn't like ++ in package names

2002-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 159058 developer/index.php makes wrong links Bug#159058: qa.debian.org: debcheck.php doesn't like ++ in package names Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Bug#159058: qa.debian.org: debcheck.php doesn't like ++ in package names

2002-09-01 Thread Peter Palfrader
retitle 159058 developer/index.php makes wrong links thanks On Sun, 01 Sep 2002, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > When I access > <http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libcrypto++> > from <http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=libcrypto%2B%2B>, &g

Bug#159058: qa.debian.org: debcheck.php doesn't like ++ in package names

2002-09-01 Thread Brian M. Carlson
Package: qa.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-01 Severity: normal When I access <http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libcrypto++> from <http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=libcrypto%2B%2B>, debcheck.php gives me the error "wrong cha