Re: BTS seems to send bugs to old maintainer of a package but displays new one correctly (Was: Bug#908065: r-cran-adegraphics: autopkgtest regression: dependency versions not properly specified)

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 09:50:28AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 10:31:34PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > > > BTW, do you have any idea why that bug is filed against Debian Med > > > packaging list[1] while the maintainer of the package is > > >

libtool_2.4.6-3.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 09:11:08 +0100 Source: libtool Binary: libtool libtool-bin libtool-doc libltdl7 libltdl-dev Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.4.6-3.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Processing of libtool_2.4.6-3.1_amd64.changes

libtool_2.4.6-3.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libtool_2.4.6-3.1.dsc libtool_2.4.6-3.1.debian.tar.xz libltdl-dev_2.4.6-3.1_amd64.deb libltdl7-dbgsym_2.4.6-3.1_amd64.deb libltdl7_2.4.6-3.1_amd64.deb libtool-bin_2.4.6-3.1_amd64.deb

BTS seems to send bugs to old maintainer of a package but displays new one correctly (Was: Bug#908065: r-cran-adegraphics: autopkgtest regression: dependency versions not properly specified)

Hi, On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 10:31:34PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > BTW, do you have any idea why that bug is filed against Debian Med > > packaging list[1] while the maintainer of the package is > > r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net? > > tracker.d.o? Hmmm, why should tracker.d.o keep a