Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/24/2
> https://ircii.warped.com/ircii-current/NEWS
> tags 986214 + fixed-upstream
Bug #986214 [src:ircii] ircii: CVE-2021-29376
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
ircii 20190117-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-04-29
It is affected by these RC bugs:
986214: ircii: CVE-2021-29376
https://bugs.debian.org/986214
This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl
alien 8.95.3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-04-24
It is affected by these RC bugs:
983492: alien: alien incorrectly generates debian/rules
https://bugs.debian.org/983492
This mail is generated by:
Hi Lucas
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:01:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Is that a real issue in practice? If you can export the changes made to
> upstream sources as a single big diff, surely you can also export them
> as separate patches in 3.0 (quilt)?
How do you export changes? And no,
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:15:45PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > IMHO, they aren't "wrong" or "inherently bad", but I believe keeping
> > them that way is more of technical debt than anything else.
>
> right, so the severity of these bugs should be wishlist or maybe normal,
> but I don't think
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:02:35PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Nothing *wrong* as the hard meaning of that word.
> But:
> * They carry the usual set of downsides of 1.0 vs 3.0, like:
>- no support for .tar.(bz2|xz|…)
>- no support for multi tarballs
those don't seem to be relevant for
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:53:06PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:58:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > 166 1.0, quilt
>
> I don't see what's wrong with these.
Nothing *wrong* as the hard meaning of that word.
But:
* They carry the usual set of downsides of 1.0
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:58:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 166 1.0, quilt
I don't see what's wrong with these.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:58:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/04/21 at 09:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Also dpatch. And also 1.0+quilt (ugh). !
>
> So the breakdown for testing is:
>
> 27 1.0, dpatch
I'll take upon myself to get rid of this set RSN.
> 166 1.0, quilt
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:01:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/04/21 at 11:33 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system)
> >
> > For this I disagree. At least
Hi Bastian,
On 08/04/21 at 11:33 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi Lucas
>
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system)
>
> For this I disagree. At least until we have something acceptable that
> can
Your message dated Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#911495: fixed in x-tile 3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #911495,
regarding x-tile 2.5-3 fails to launch with Segmentation fault error message
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#821019: fixed in x-tile 3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #821019,
regarding x-tile is segfaulting when I launch it while Atom (https://atom.io/)
is running
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#737569: fixed in x-tile 3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #737569,
regarding AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'XTile'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#845960: fixed in x-tile 3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845960,
regarding x-tile: depends on python-gnome2 which deprecated
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 08/04/21 at 09:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system)
>
> Also dpatch. And also 1.0+quilt (ugh). !
So the breakdown for testing is:
27 1.0, dpatch
166 1.0, quilt
374 1.0, no changes
395 1.0, direct changes
Hi,
On 08/04/21 at 09:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I just updated Debian Trends: https://trends.debian.net/
>
> Thank you.
> I noted that the dates in the "smells" sections are still old. Could
> you perhaps refresh those
Afin de voir votre message, cliquez sur le lien:
http://link.news-sarouty.ma/v/443/de86ac2aa9610f177c78515b6570b6b393b2665fc349b5b3
Hi Lucas
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system)
For this I disagree. At least until we have something acceptable that
can be used in modern git workflows including operations like cherry
picking and
Hey again
I'd offer to help with your website...
...but it's not really my ‘domain’.
Just checking to see if you’ve had a chance to read my message before. If
you could let me know, it’d be most appreciated.
Hope you’re doing good.
Thanks in advance,
Linda
click here to stop hearing
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 12:26:31PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:06:46AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system)
> >
> > Also dpatch. And also 1.0+quilt (ugh). !
> What's left then? Only packages
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:06:46AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > - source format 1.0 with direct changes in .diff.gz (no patch system)
>
> Also dpatch. And also 1.0+quilt (ugh). !
What's left then? Only packages that don't patch the upstream sources at
all?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I just updated Debian Trends: https://trends.debian.net/
Thank you.
I noted that the dates in the "smells" sections are still old. Could
you perhaps refresh those data as well, so that we have a better idea if
things today are
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:05:43PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> > - no support for build-arch and build-indep
> That seems fine, but I'm not sure I'm knowledgeable enough to say for
> certain. I assume that these Just Work if I'm using modern debhelper?
You mean "dh"? Yes.
Bastian
--
Bones:
24 matches
Mail list logo
