Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-28 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:12 AM Paul Wise wrote: > > Updating the bug metadata to reflect that suggestion. Thanks, pabs! Hope this fix can be deployed soon. Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Processed: Re: Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - wontfix Bug #932431 [qa.debian.org] DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #932431 to the same tags previously set > retitle -1 DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default, Bug

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-27 Thread Paul Wise
Control: tags -1 - wontfix Control: retitle -1 DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default, add option to show them On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 6:00 AM Paul Wise wrote: > The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by > default, perhaps with a parameter to show ESO

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:54 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I think above perfectly explains why the original issue of the ticket > occurs, and it's by design. > So I add the "wontfix" tag to this ticket. The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by default, perhaps with

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Roger Shimizu
control: tags -1 +wontfix On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Paul Wise wrote: > > It seems if a package from experimental has Built-Using on a package in > unstable, then dak pulls the unstable source package into experimental > and adds ESO: yes. I think above perfectly explains why the original

Processed: Re: Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +wontfix Bug #932431 [qa.debian.org] DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 932431: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932431 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:27 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I think this can explain why an old version of package is still in > archive, but still cannot explain why it appears in *experimental* > column in DDPO page. This simply because DDPO just reflects what is in the archive, if you grep the

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:08 AM Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote: > > > So what's ESO? > > A package which has this in the Packages file: > > Extra-Source-Only: yes > > dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around > for license

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote: > So what's ESO? A package which has this in the Packages file: Extra-Source-Only: yes dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around for license compliance purposes because another package still has a Built-Using

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2019-07-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:58:15AM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > I have noticed that the package 'golang-github-jinzhu-inflection' is > still listed in the experimental column of my DDPO page [1] but it has > in the meantime been superseded by a newer version in testing. rmadison > also shows

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2019-07-19 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear DDPO team, I have noticed that the package 'golang-github-jinzhu-inflection' is still listed in the experimental column of my DDPO page [1] but it has in the meantime been superseded by a newer version in testing. rmadison also shows this package to