On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 02:17:13PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:04:35AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I wonder if storing metadata (including Homepage, debian/watch,
> > debian/upstream/*) about the upstream project in the Debian source
> > package is the wrong approach.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:04:35AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> I wonder if storing metadata (including Homepage, debian/watch,
> debian/upstream/*) about the upstream project in the Debian source
> package is the wrong approach. Upstream metadata can change without
> any need for the Debian source
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:37 PM Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> > Would it make sense to standardize the current proposal as DEP-12, perhaps
> > with
> > a limited set of uncontroversial and widely used fields?
Le Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:04:35AM +, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> I wonder if storing
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:37 PM Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Would it make sense to standardize the current proposal as DEP-12, perhaps
> with
> a limited set of uncontroversial and widely used fields?
I wonder if storing metadata (including Homepage, debian/watch,
debian/upstream/*) about the
uot; lives in
debian/control and rather than DEP-12.
* as discussed previously, Contact and Name live in debian/copyright rather
than debian/upstream/metadata
Next Steps
==
Would it make sense to standardize the current proposal as DEP-12, perhaps with
a limited set of uncontroversial
5 matches
Mail list logo
