Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (30/12/2009):
I'm about to QA-upload defoma with this change in the various
debhelper-files/* files, but I wanted to open this bugreport for
reference.
Fortunately, I didn't do so, that wouldn't have helped (yay for
sleeping before uploading :)).
Here's a
Package: sun-java6-plugin
Version: 6-16-1
Severity: normal
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560044) solved the problem
for me also, but as this is just a workaround, I guess the bug should not be
closed until the source of the problem is solved.
-- System Information:
Debian
defoma_0.11.10-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
defoma_0.11.10-4.dsc
defoma_0.11.10-4.tar.gz
defoma_0.11.10-4_all.deb
defoma-doc_0.11.10-4_all.deb
psfontmgr_0.11.10-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
YOSHINO Yoshihito yy.y.ja...@gmail.com (31/12/2009):
Hello,
Hi,
test -x `which foo` foo bar baz
returns status 1, which comes to an error if a script executed this
as the last command. E.g. like #563121, prerm will exit with status
1 if defoma not found unless explicitly writing the last
Accepted:
defoma-doc_0.11.10-4_all.deb
to main/d/defoma/defoma-doc_0.11.10-4_all.deb
defoma_0.11.10-4.dsc
to main/d/defoma/defoma_0.11.10-4.dsc
defoma_0.11.10-4.tar.gz
to main/d/defoma/defoma_0.11.10-4.tar.gz
defoma_0.11.10-4_all.deb
to main/d/defoma/defoma_0.11.10-4_all.deb
Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:17:09 +
with message-id e1nqktp-00021b...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563121: fixed in defoma 0.11.10-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #563121,
regarding dh_installdefoma leads to buggy maintainer scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (31/12/2009):
Current/common practice within debhelper seems to be:
| if [ -x `which foo 2/dev/null` ]; then…
I think I'm going to upload with such a change once I'm up (for
real, not vaguely opening eyes).
Hi again,
I've just checked that fontconfig 2.8.0-1
Package: gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mpegdemux and gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mpegmux
Version: testing
Both packages are not installable together with gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad,
but for in my case i do NOT want to uninstall gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad,
as this
package is needed by e.g. pidgin, etc...
FYI: The status of the sgml-data source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.0.3
Current version: 2.0.4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the remotefs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.11+debian-2
Current version: 0.11+debian-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
FYI: The status of the xview source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.2p1.4-24
Current version: 3.2p1.4-25
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:03:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (30/12/2009):
I'm about to QA-upload defoma with this change in the various
debhelper-files/* files, but I wanted to open this bugreport for
reference.
Fortunately, I didn't do
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (31/12/2009):
Check out the 'bash' manual -- set -e explicitly excludes precisely
this case from causing early termination of the script:
[…]
Alrighty. I must confess I'm not really keen on checking what happens
in the various shells, but that seems to be true
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:44:18 +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
In the meanwhile, defoma was uploaded with the debhelper-like syntax
(as quoted above). In my previous mail[1], you can scratch “until new
defoma is installed on all architectures” since it's arch: all. ;)
Ok, I've
14 matches
Mail list logo
