Bug#363502: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 Control: reassign -1 libreadline6 Control: retitle -1 libreadline6: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions Control: found -1 6.2+dfsg-0.1 Control: reassign -3 bash Control: retitle -3 bash (readline): Something is wrong with binding keys to functions Control: fo

Processed: Re: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 -3 Bug #363502 [libreadline5] libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions Bug 363502 cloned as bugs 708978-708979 > reassign -1 libreadline6 Bug #363502 [libreadline5] libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions B

Bug#363502: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 19 May 2013 22:18, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > found 363502 5.2+dfsg-2 > thanks > > On 2013-05-19 20:49:43 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > > libreadline5 seems to be used by few programs now, so it's not so > > important. I think it's most important that it be filed against > > libreadline6 and bas

Bug#363502: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
found 363502 5.2+dfsg-2 thanks On 2013-05-19 20:49:43 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > libreadline5 seems to be used by few programs now, so it's not so > important. I think it's most important that it be filed against > libreadline6 and bash. However, since it's likely to be the same bug in > librea

Processed: Re: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 363502 5.2+dfsg-2 Bug #363502 [libreadline5] libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions Marked as found in versions readline5/5.2+dfsg-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#363502: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 19 May 2013 17:55, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2013-05-19 14:17:59 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > > This bug still exists, but I'm no longer sure to which package it should > be > > assigned. I come across the bug in bash 4.2, which doesn't seem to depend > > on any version of libreadline now (

Bug#363502: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-05-19 14:17:59 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > This bug still exists, but I'm no longer sure to which package it should be > assigned. I come across the bug in bash 4.2, which doesn't seem to depend > on any version of libreadline now (e.g. bash 4.2-5). It seems that bash now includes its ow

libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2013-05-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 15:44:09 +0200 Source: libvigraimpex Binary: libvigraimpex-dev libvigraimpex4 libvigraimpex-doc python-vigra python-vigra-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.9.0+dfsg-3 Distribution: experi

Bug#701313: marked as done (libvigraimpex: ftbfs with GCC-4.8)

2013-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 15:04:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#701313: fixed in libvigraimpex 1.9.0+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #701313, regarding libvigraimpex: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processing of libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.changes

2013-05-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3.dsc libvigraimpex_1.9.0+dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz libvigraimpex-dev_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.deb libvigraimpex4_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.deb python-vigra_1.9.0+dfsg-3_i386.deb libvig

Bug#363502: libreadline5: Something is wrong with binding keys to functions

2013-05-19 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 17 May 2006 22:43, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2006-04-19 15:11:20 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> >>> I can get some Ctrl-letter keys to work by doing things like: >>> >>> "\x1": kill-whole-line # binds C-a to kill-whole-line >>> >>> but \x15 does