sgml-base_1.28_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-06-14 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:20:42 +0200 Source: sgml-base Binary: sgml-base Architecture: source Version: 1.28 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Helmut Grohne Description: sgml-ba

Bug#825002: marked as done (sgml-base: broken super catalog after removing docutils-common)

2016-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:52:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#825002: fixed in sgml-base 1.28 has caused the Debian Bug report #825002, regarding sgml-base: broken super catalog after removing docutils-common to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Processing of sgml-base_1.28_source.changes

2016-06-14 Thread Debian FTP Masters
sgml-base_1.28_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sgml-base_1.28.dsc sgml-base_1.28.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

Processed: retitle 827300 to guacamole-server: FTBFS: guac_handlers.c:398:13: error: channel_change_pty_size is deprecated ...

2016-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 827300 guacamole-server: FTBFS: guac_handlers.c:398:13: error: > channel_change_pty_size is deprecated Bug #827300 [src:guacamole-server] guacamole-server: FTBFS: Changed Bug title to 'guacamole-server: FTBFS: guac_handlers.c:398:13: err

Bug#436944: marked as done (gdbm: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1))

2016-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:00:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#436944: fixed in gdbm 1.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #436944, regarding gdbm: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#682239: marked as done (gdbm: New upstream version available)

2016-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:00:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#682239: fixed in gdbm 1.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #682239, regarding gdbm: New upstream version available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#589761: marked as done (libgdbm3: debian/rules should not prevent usage of flock)

2016-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:00:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#589761: fixed in gdbm 1.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #589761, regarding libgdbm3: debian/rules should not prevent usage of flock to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#340479: marked as done (noffle: problems with largefile limit)

2016-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:00:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#340479: fixed in gdbm 1.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #340479, regarding noffle: problems with largefile limit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t