Bug#992997: milter-greylist: segfault in libGeoIP

Package: milter-greylist Version: 4.6.2-3 Severity: normal Seeing lots of these after upgrading til bullseye: Aug 23 22:12:23 louie kernel: milter-greylist[192919]: segfault at 28 ip 7fbaf22fe8d9 sp 7fbaee77c670 error 4 in libGeoIP.so.1.6.12[7fbaf22fc000+1b000] Aug 23 22:12:23 louie ker

Bug#992996: dbtoepub creates temporary directories unsecurely and unreliably

Package: dbtoepub Version: 0+svn9904-4 Hi all! This security/reliability patch is not present in Debian stable's dbtoepub: https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/commit/10c1f2e3a565c4799ec1106784c76f6cd7f2f2ea As a result, my home site's `*.epub`s have been building unreliably. -- Shlom

kinput2 is marked for autoremoval from testing

kinput2 3.1-13 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-23 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 978778: canna: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978778 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail

tmexpand is marked for autoremoval from testing

tmexpand 0.1.2.0-4.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-24 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 979458: jed: jed-common: WARNING: tempfile is deprecated; consider using mktemp instead. https://bugs.debian.org/979458 979459: jed: WARNING: tempfile is deprecated; consi

canna is marked for autoremoval from testing

canna 3.7p3-16 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-23 It is affected by these RC bugs: 978778: canna: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978778 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

canna-shion is marked for autoremoval from testing

canna-shion 0.0.20010204-13 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-23 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 978778: canna: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978778 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/maste

ng is marked for autoremoval from testing

ng 1.5~beta1-9 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-23 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 978778: canna: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978778 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail

lxctl is marked for autoremoval from testing

lxctl 0.3.1+debian-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-23 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 978862: lxc: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978862 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/

pepperflashplugin-nonfree is marked for autoremoval from testing

pepperflashplugin-nonfree 1.8.8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm https://bugs.debian.org/978954 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools

flpsed is marked for autoremoval from testing

flpsed 0.7.3-8 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 978811: flpsed: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978811 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

opensysusers is marked for autoremoval from testing

opensysusers 0.6-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-09 It is affected by these RC bugs: 992058: opensysusers: uses `eval` on data that is not supposed to be safe to eval (CVE-2021-40084) https://bugs.debian.org/992058 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/releas

java2html is marked for autoremoval from testing

java2html 0.9.2-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 978840: java2html: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978840 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremova

coinor-vol is marked for autoremoval from testing

coinor-vol 1.5.4-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 978791: coinor-vol: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978791 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremo

ample is marked for autoremoval from testing

ample 0.5.7-11 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 978763: ample: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978763 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

milter-greylist is marked for autoremoval from testing

milter-greylist 4.6.2-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 978863: milter-greylist: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70 https://bugs.debian.org/978863 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mai

varmon is marked for autoremoval from testing

varmon 1.2.1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 981522: varmon: varmon - ship with bullseye? https://bugs.debian.org/981522 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals

svtools is marked for autoremoval from testing

svtools 0.6-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-09-08 It is affected by these RC bugs: 981496: svtools: ship with bullseye? https://bugs.debian.org/981496 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl Auto

Bug#992981: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

Control: forwarded -1 https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110532 On 2021-08-26 00:54:02 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Patch attached. I tested it and solves the failure with GNU MPFR. I've reported the bug upstream and submitted the patch, as the issue is reproducible from the git reposi

Processed: Re: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110532 Bug #992981 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++ Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?110532'. -- 992981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#992981: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

Control: tags -1 patch On 2021-08-26 00:09:07 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-08-25 23:56:45 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > I've found the cause. With Autoconf 2.69, there was > > > > #ifdef __cplusplus > > extern "C" > > #endif > > > > at the beginning of the test program generated b

Processed: Re: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #992981 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++ Added tag(s) patch. -- 992981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#992981: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

Control: tags -1 upstream On 2021-08-25 23:56:45 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I've found the cause. With Autoconf 2.69, there was > > #ifdef __cplusplus > extern "C" > #endif > > at the beginning of the test program generated by Autoconf. > This is no longer the case with Autoconf 2.71. A man

Processed: Re: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

Processing control commands: > tags -1 upstream Bug #992981 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++ Added tag(s) upstream. -- 992981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

libapache2-mod-bw_0.92-12_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:24:06 -0400 Source: libapache2-mod-bw Architecture: source Version: 0.92-12 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan Yang Changes: libapache2-mod-bw (

Bug#992981: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

On 2021-08-25 23:41:34 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > When I want to build MPFR with g++, I get: > > checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... no > configure: error: libgmp not found or uses a different ABI (including static > vs shared). > > due to > > dnl Check if we can link with GMP > AC_CHECK_

Processing of libapache2-mod-bw_0.92-12_source.changes

libapache2-mod-bw_0.92-12_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache2-mod-bw_0.92-12.dsc libapache2-mod-bw_0.92.orig.tar.gz libapache2-mod-bw_0.92-12.debian.tar.xz libapache2-mod-bw_0.92-12_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#992981: autoconf: AC_CHECK_LIB no longer works with g++

Package: autoconf Version: 2.71-2 Severity: important When I want to build MPFR with g++, I get: checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... no configure: error: libgmp not found or uses a different ABI (including static vs shared). due to dnl Check if we can link with GMP AC_CHECK_LIB(gmp, __gmpz_in

Bug#992973: plib: CVE-2021-38714

Source: plib Version: 1.8.5-8 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole Forwarded: https://sourceforge.net/p/plib/bugs/55/ X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for plib. CVE-2021-38714[0]: | In Plib t

Processed: f

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 935912 > https://sourceforge.net/p/apng2gif/discussion/main/thread/3865668fec/ Bug #935912 [apng2gif] Stack-buffer-overflow in main function Bug #854453 [apng2gif] apng2gif: Stack overflow because of improper input parameter sanitizat

Website Development.

Hello Good Morning, I am a Web\App Development Manager and I work with 120+experienced IT professionals who are into: App Development (Android + iOS), Web development, UX & UI Web design, Graphic design, E-Commerce solutions. If you are interested, then I can send you our price list and an affor