Bug#993678: Patch fixes problem

I can confirm that the patch fixes the reported issue. Regards, Daniel

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

upstream - the Debian packages should always behave like the upstream releases. Thus we were always working closely with upstream (Debian even had a chair in the OASIS, IIRC). And I fail to see good reasons. why we would want to change that, as well. Daniel -- Regards, Daniel Leidert |

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

Am Montag, dem 21.02.2022 um 00:55 -0300 schrieb Joao Eriberto Mota Filho: > Package: docbook > Version: 4.5-9 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin , Adam Di Carlo > , J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) , Yann Dirson > , Steve Langasek , Daniel Leidert > (dale) , Jakub Wilk

Bug#993678: Fails to produce PDF output when using scale.by.width - produces broken lstlisting/lstcode options

Package: dblatex Version: 0.3.12py3-1 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 While building a PDF we stumbled upon an issue. Some of our XML files contain screen elements with non UTF-8 characters. When we enable scaling for listing elements: scale.by.width dblatex

Bug#708502: New dpkg no longer contains install-info, rising to serious

# sent too early by accident Hi, Andreas, if you are right with your observation (which I don't doubt), than dh_installinfo/debhelper needs to care about creating an empty prerm script. It cannot be the task of package maintainers, which are affected by this transition, to create and ship an empt

Bug#708502: New dpkg no longer contains install-info, rising to serious

Hi, Andreas, if you are right with your observation (which I don't doubt), than dh_installinfo/debhelper needs to care about creating an empty prerm script. It cannot be the task of package maintainers, which are affected by this transition to create and ship an empty prerm scripts for 2 releases

Bug#560920: CVE-2009-3560: Revised patch

Hi, After fixing CVE-2009-3560 in the expat package [1] I was informed, that it broke parsing [2] in some documents. After talking to upstream [3], the fix for CVE-2009-3560 has been adjusted [4][5]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/560901 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/561658 [3] http://mail.libexpat.org/

Bug#528121: O: xml-resume-library -- A set of tools for writing a resume in XML

Hi Patrick, Am Donnerstag, den 22.10.2009, 12:43 +0200 schrieb Patrick Schoenfeld: > I've seen that you were interested to adopt the xml-resume-library > package, but lost interest. If I have some more time maybe I'll adopt this package. > But as far as I can tell from your > comments you alre

Bug#257715: Bug#295579: any news on ITA: docbook-defguide ?

Am Sonntag, den 09.12.2007, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: [docbook-defguide ITA] > Have you made some progress on this stuff? Ok, so this is JFTR. After a long night, most of the work is done (maybe around 70%): http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-xml-sgml/packages/docbook-defguide/trunk/?rev

Bug#414261: Added .desktop file

Am Samstag, den 10.03.2007, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Luca Falavigna: > Please find attached a debdiff implementing this. > Thank you. > einfaches Textdokument-Anlage (xawtv_3.95.dfsg.1-3.debdiff) > diff -Nru xawtv-3.95.dfsg.1/debian/changelog > xawtv-3.95.dfsg.1/debian/changelog > --- xawtv-3.95.dfsg.1

Bug#299692: docbook-ebnf: Examples don't seem to work

tags 299692 + patch pending thanks Hi, I'm about to take over and update the docbook-ebnf package. About the issue you reported in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299692;archive=yes. The EBNF Public IDs are not registered in the root catalog. Doing a XML_CATALOG_FILES=/usr/shar