On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 02:32:54PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> No, that's not what $PACKAGE in dpkg-maintscript-helper is used for.
> You can't "mark" a conffile as belonging to another package this way.
Maybe I misundertood something how it works internally.
But it has the effect that I
Am 09.06.2018 um 14:28 schrieb Reiner Herrmann:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 02:16:14PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Why would the timidity package remove a conffile that belongs to another
>> package? That doesn't make sense to me.
>
> Because the conffile removed from package A could be
On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 02:16:14PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Why would the timidity package remove a conffile that belongs to another
> package? That doesn't make sense to me.
Because the conffile removed from package A could be installed / taken
over by package B. As far as I understood it,
Am 09.06.2018 um 13:36 schrieb Reiner Herrmann:
> Hi Sven and Michael,
>
> thank you for the report and sorry for breaking it.
>
>> specifically
>>
>> timidity.maintscript
>> rm_conffile/etc/default/timidity2.14.0-1~timidity-daemon
>>
>> doesn't look correct either.
>>
Hi Sven and Michael,
thank you for the report and sorry for breaking it.
> specifically
>
> timidity.maintscript
> rm_conffile/etc/default/timidity2.14.0-1~timidity-daemon
>
> doesn't look correct either.
> dpkg-maintscript-helper does not have support for moving conffiles from
>
The changes in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/timidity/commit/3e768cabe537f2a8a22a51f4eb398a974fe15e25
specifically
timidity.maintscript
rm_conffile/etc/default/timidity2.14.0-1~timidity-daemon
doesn't look correct either.
dpkg-maintscript-helper does not have support for moving
Package: timidity
Version: 2.14.0-2
Severity: serious
When upgrading timidity and timidity-daemon from 2.13.2-41 the following
happened (sorry for the German):
,
| Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../timidity_2.14.0-2_i386.deb ...
| Entpacken von timidity (2.14.0-2) über (2.13.2-41+b1) ...
|
7 matches
Mail list logo
