Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote: > > Looking at the patches, this really is: > [...] > > Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do something > for > other users. > > A first look

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote: > > Looking at the patches, this really is: > [...] > > Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do something > for > other users. > > A first look

Bug#639744: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Seems like it would be better if we also handled the issue at the libssl > level. OpenSSL maintainers: does that sound doable? I'm not sure what you mean. We don't provide any certificates, you need to tell openssl which cert

Bug#639744: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > Seems like it would be better if we also handled the issue at the libssl > > level. OpenSSL maintainers: does that sound doable? > > I'm not sure what you mean

Bug#466920: marked as done (cdcd: segfaults with 'rndplay' if no disc in drive)

2011-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:02:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#466920: fixed in cdcd 0.6.6-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #466920, regarding cdcd: segfaults with 'rndplay' if no disc in drive to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#568996: marked as done (no sound with cdcd in sid)

2011-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:02:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#568996: fixed in cdcd 0.6.6-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #568996, regarding no sound with cdcd in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#602752: marked as done (cdcd: everything seems to work as expected, but no sound :()

2011-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:02:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#602752: fixed in cdcd 0.6.6-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #602752, regarding cdcd: everything seems to work as expected, but no sound :( to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2011-09-04 at 01:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote: > > Looking at the patches, this really is: > [...] > > Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do something > for > other users. > > A first look at stu

Processing of libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1_i386.changes

2011-09-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1.dsc libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6.orig.tar.gz libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1.debian.tar.gz libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-09-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1.debian.tar.gz to main/liba/libapache2-mod-rpaf/libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1.debian.tar.gz libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1.dsc to main/liba/libapache2-mod-rpaf/libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1.dsc libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1_i386.deb to main/liba/libapache2-mod-rpaf/libapa

libapache2-mod-rpaf override disparity

2011-09-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-1_i386.deb: package says section is web, override says httpd. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debu

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Micah Gersten
On 09/04/2011 10:35 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On dim., 2011-09-04 at 01:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote: >>> Looking at the patches, this really is: >> [...] >> >> Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do >>

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Sunday 04 September 2011 02:34:13 Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > * Qt: > > Qt4 has built-in support for SSL via OpenSSL. > > Qt 4.7 (wheezey+) uses certs from /etc/ssl > > Qt 4.6 and older (lenny, squeeze) uses its own bundled list of c

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Raphael Geissert
[Dropping CC on openssl maintainers, to reduce noise] On Sunday 04 September 2011 10:35:16 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On dim., 2011-09-04 at 01:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Looking at the patches, this really is: > > [...] >

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2011-09-04 at 13:34 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > [Dropping CC on openssl maintainers, to reduce noise] > > On Sunday 04 September 2011 10:35:16 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On dim., 2011-09-04 at 01:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Ho

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

2011-09-04 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Sunday 04 September 2011 13:54:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On dim., 2011-09-04 at 13:34 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > On Sunday 04 September 2011 10:35:16 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > For other NSS users I guess they're ok? I've just checked in evolution > > > certificate store and ther

Please confirm your subscription

2011-09-04 Thread John Stark
To confirm your subscription, click on the link below (you must be connected to the internet at the time): http://www.eldira.com/cgi-bin/amlm/register.cgi?id=45C6inHeXO&act=7 If you did not make the request, there is no need to take any further action. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-pa