Bug#647473: question about your patch
Hi Dave, diff -ur sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/postrm sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/postrm --- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/postrm 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400 +++ sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/postrm 2011-11-02 22:16:27.312000538 -0400 @@ -4,8 +4,14 @@ if [ $1 = purge ] then -rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/sgml -rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/xml +rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/sgml || : +rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/xml || : +fi + +if [ $1 = remove ] +then +rm -f /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml* || : +rm -f /etc/sgml/sgml-data* || : fi This patch seems to remove configuration files unconditionally on remove. This seems wrong to me. Can you explain? cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20061223.26367.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#338565: marked as done (ircii: purging leaves /etc/irc/servers on disk)
Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:03:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#338565: fixed in ircii 20051015-2.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #338565, regarding ircii: purging leaves /etc/irc/servers on disk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 338565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338565 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ircii Version: 20051015-1 Testing ircii with piuparts, I get the following error: 0m13.0s ERROR: Package purging left files on system: /etc/irc owned by: ircii /etc/irc/servers The prerm script attempts to remove the file, but, alas, it doesn't exist at the time the package is being purged (at least if it is first removed and then purged, like piuparts does). The only maintainer script remaining during a purge is postrm. -- We live in a duct tape society. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ircii Source-Version: 20051015-2.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ircii, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ircii_20051015-2.3.diff.gz to pool/main/i/ircii/ircii_20051015-2.3.diff.gz ircii_20051015-2.3.dsc to pool/main/i/ircii/ircii_20051015-2.3.dsc ircii_20051015-2.3_i386.deb to pool/main/i/ircii/ircii_20051015-2.3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 455...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Eisentraut pet...@debian.org (supplier of updated ircii package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:42:22 +0200 Source: ircii Binary: ircii Architecture: source i386 Version: 20051015-2.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels e...@debian.org Changed-By: Peter Eisentraut pet...@debian.org Description: ircii - Internet Relay Chat client Closes: 455020 Changes: ircii (20051015-2.3) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Moved purge rules from prerm to postrm (closes: #455020) Files: f74a5c33fc25f47ab7a711b265e7b00b 575 net optional ircii_20051015-2.3.dsc a9369a3509b7f4f38a2882a388615333 10034 net optional ircii_20051015-2.3.diff.gz 04dbda7ecae1f29beae475ebd5ca1458 485630 net optional ircii_20051015-2.3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9rDqTTx8oVVPtMYRAqMeAJ9+j9+xfjqlWK9TPQmXzC8nc5OIZQCeMewu yUqu6yvoly4wP82RNNTZoig= =h1VS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processing of libnss-lwres_0.93-7_amd64.changes
libnss-lwres_0.93-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libnss-lwres_0.93-7.dsc libnss-lwres_0.93-7.debian.tar.gz libnss-lwres_0.93-7_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rn2z3-0004kk...@franck.debian.org
libnss-lwres override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libnss-lwres_0.93-7_amd64.deb: package says section is net, override says admin. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rn34v-0004sx...@franck.debian.org
Processing of gtalk_0.99.10-15_amd64.changes
gtalk_0.99.10-15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gtalk_0.99.10-15.dsc gtalk_0.99.10-15.diff.gz gtalk_0.99.10-15_amd64.deb etalk_0.99.10-15_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rn5ap-0004xg...@franck.debian.org
Bug#110907: marked as done (ircII sends wrong IP address in DCC packets)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2011 17:21:41 +0100 with message-id 2006162136.ga11...@server.brlink.eu and subject line 110907 most likely fixed since 20020912-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #110907, regarding ircII sends wrong IP address in DCC packets to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 110907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=110907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ircii Version: 20010612-4 Severity: important Hi Darren, I noticed recently that I can not initiate DCC SEND and DCC CHAT from ircII on my home computer. Epic4 works fine. After some investigation I found the reason: I use iptables-base firewall and ip-conntrack-irc kernel module (from kernel-patch-irc package). The computer works as a router between the home network and the cable modem, and therefore it has two IP addresses - 192.168.2.1 (eth0) and 62.252.23.99 (eth1). Unlike epic4, ircII always uses 192.168.2.1 in DCC SEND and CHAT commands. Obviously, ip-conntrack-irc module gets confused, reports this as forged DCC command, and refuses to accept the reverse connection. I have not made the patch yet, but I think the problem is in the connect_to_server_direct() functon inside server.c. When it figures out the local IP address of a server connection, it should use the address reported by getsockname() rather than rely on gethostname(). When I rebuilt ircII with --disable-ipv6, the problem has gone, so must be inside that #ifdef INET6 block (lines 894-910 of server.c). Regards, Dima. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux cyxapuk 2.4.9 #1 Sat Sep 1 18:29:36 BST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages ircii depends on: ii libc6 2.2.4-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libncurses55.2.20010318-3 Shared libraries for terminal handling ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package: ircii Version: 20020912-1 The code in question seems to have been rewritten for version 20020912, so I guess this bug should be fixed since version 20020912-1. (Or there is a new unrelated bug). Thus closing this one. Bernhard R. Link ---End Message---
farm fence
Dear Import Manager Chinese farm fence factory main produce Galvanized wire,field fence (farm fence; grassland fence; ranch fence), pole and barbed wire. Grassland fence is made fromhigh-tensile galvanized wire. Usage of grassland fence: grassland build, road construction; fixed-point graze and separate feeding. In the meantime, the fence can be used for family-owned ranch/farm with peasant and herdsman. We can supply the standard size and also produce as you required. If any of them interested of you, please send Inquiry to this email. Best Regards Jack Liu Skpye：Jack-Liu80 MSN:hq-fe...@hotmail.com TEL:0086-311-80809553 FAX:0086-311-80809557 Website: www.fence-farm.com
Bug#511214: marked as done (ircii doesn't start)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2011 17:31:35 +0100 with message-id 2006163131.ga11...@server.brlink.eu and subject line Closing 511214 has caused the Debian Bug report #511214, regarding ircii doesn't start to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511214: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511214 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ircii Version: 20051015-2.3 Severity: normal ircii is BitchX i think, but i try to run BitchX at command line and it doesn't start and i type ircii and it doesn't start, it is like the package is not installed but it is. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-0.slh.6-sidux-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ircii depends on: ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.7+20081220-1 shared libraries for terminal hand ircii recommends no packages. ircii suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This seems to be no bug, but a misunderstanding about the package and binary name, so closing... Bernhard R. Link ---End Message---
gtalk_0.99.10-15_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: etalk_0.99.10-15_all.deb to main/g/gtalk/etalk_0.99.10-15_all.deb gtalk_0.99.10-15.diff.gz to main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-15.diff.gz gtalk_0.99.10-15.dsc to main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-15.dsc gtalk_0.99.10-15_amd64.deb to main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-15_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: etalk_0.99.10-15_all.deb - optional editors gtalk_0.99.10-15.dsc - source net gtalk_0.99.10-15_amd64.deb - optional net Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rn5qa-0006si...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647473: question about your patch
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: Hi Dave, ... + +if [ $1 = remove ] +then + rm -f /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml* || : + rm -f /etc/sgml/sgml-data* || : fi This patch seems to remove configuration files unconditionally on remove. This seems wrong to me. Can you explain? ... After sgml-data installation, the following files appear under /etc: /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml.bak /etc/sgml/sgml-data.cat /etc/sgml/sgml-data.cat.old Upon removal, the last 3 remain, and ultimately cause the piuparts failure. So, when removing the sgml-data package, I am removing sgml-data files from etc. Are you suggesting that i shouldn't use the wildcards? if not, what is the issue? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caohcdnaconbj3pjp1jpcrs-+7ffymtgakqgvthg8hnytpve...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#647473: question about your patch
Hi, On Sonntag, 6. November 2011, Dave Steele wrote: After sgml-data installation, the following files appear under /etc: /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml.bak /etc/sgml/sgml-data.cat /etc/sgml/sgml-data.cat.old Upon removal, the last 3 remain, and ultimately cause the piuparts failure. So, when removing the sgml-data package, I am removing sgml-data files from etc. Are you suggesting that i shouldn't use the wildcards? if not, what is the issue? configuration files should only be removed on purge. cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20062112.05650.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#647473: Fwd: question about your patch
-- Forwarded message -- From: Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:40 PM Subject: Re: question about your patch To: Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: configuration files should only be removed on purge. Ah, I've been bitten by an rpm-ism. Is this right? --- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/postrm 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400 +++ sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/postrm 2011-11-06 15:26:05.03230 -0500 @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ if [ $1 = purge ] then + rm -f /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml* || : + rm -f /etc/sgml/sgml-data* || : rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/sgml rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/xml fi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOHcdNa4KAB4Mg=5Mo24pQxh2PZ0xV=izEQg=_hy5ghbwdh...@mail.gmail.com
Processing of jfbterm_0.4.7-9_amd64.changes
jfbterm_0.4.7-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jfbterm_0.4.7-9.dsc jfbterm_0.4.7-9.diff.gz jfbterm_0.4.7-9_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rn9ts-0008qy...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647857: smarty: UCF error message on install
Package: smarty Version: 2.6.20-1.3 Severity: normal When installing the package smarty with apt-get the following warning is prompted between the install screens asking for the MySQL application password for smbind and the final prompt to restart Apache: Setting up smbind (0.4.7-3+lenny1) ... dbconfig-common: writing config to /etc/dbconfig-common/smbind.conf *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf, and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh! Please inform the package maintainer about this problem. Creating config file /etc/dbconfig-common/smbind.conf with new version Creating config file /etc/smbind/config-db.php with new version granting access to database smbind for smbind@localhost: success. This is the mentioned information :) Kind regards Nico -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.9 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-028stab092.1 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages smarty depends on: ii php5 5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny13 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php5-cgi 5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny13 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php5-cli 5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny13 command-line interpreter for the p smarty recommends no packages. smarty suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2006212341.32001.35177.report...@lvps178-77-78-152.dedicated.hosteurope.de
jfbterm_0.4.7-9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: jfbterm_0.4.7-9.diff.gz to main/j/jfbterm/jfbterm_0.4.7-9.diff.gz jfbterm_0.4.7-9.dsc to main/j/jfbterm/jfbterm_0.4.7-9.dsc jfbterm_0.4.7-9_amd64.deb to main/j/jfbterm/jfbterm_0.4.7-9_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: jfbterm_0.4.7-9.dsc - source utils jfbterm_0.4.7-9_amd64.deb - optional utils Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rna6g-00019d...@franck.debian.org
Bug#604357: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:35:04 + with message-id e1rnamq-0004yj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#647808: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604357, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 604357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604357 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: libqwt Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt3libs-removal Dear maintainer, The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from Debian shortly after the Squeeze release. The transition phase to KDE4 and Qt4 will finish since both KDE and Nokia upstream don't maintain the old versions of those libraries anymore. In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on the KDE3/Qt3 libraries have to either get ported to KDE4/Qt4 or eventually get removed from the Debian repositories. Therefore, please take the time and: - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a KDE4/Qt4 port of your application - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are suitable alternatives for your users - if there is a KDE4/Qt4 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it - if both the KDE3/Qt3 and the KDE4/Qt4 version already coexist in the Debian archives, consider removing the KDE3/Qt3 version Documentation on how to port to KDE4 can be found at: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/KDE4_Porting_Guide Documentation on how to port to Qt4 can be found at: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/porting4.html For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Eckhart ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 4.2.0-6+rm Dear submitter, as the package libqwt has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/647808 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ---End Message---
Bug#647817: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libgnujmi-java | 0.0cvs20050116-4 | source, all libgnujmi-java-doc | 0.0cvs20050116-4 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; Orphaned library, no rdeps, low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 647...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/647817 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rnakk-0004dm...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647817: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.0cvs20050116-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package libgnujmi-java has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/647817 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rnakr-0004ez...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647808: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libqwt |4.2.0-6 | source libqwt-doc |4.2.0-6 | all libqwt4c2 |4.2.0-6 | amd64, armel, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; RoQA, qt3, orphaned -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 647...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/647808 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rnaml-0004xd...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647808: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 4.2.0-6+rm Dear submitter, as the package libqwt has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/647808 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rnamq-0004yj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647818: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libpng-sixlegs-java |1.3.0-2 | all libpng-sixlegs-java-doc |1.3.0-2 | all png-sixlegs |1.3.0-2 | source --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, dead-upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 647...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/647818 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rnanq-0004cx...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647818: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.3.0-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package png-sixlegs has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/647818 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rnanw-0004ch...@franck.debian.org
Bug#647473: question about your patch
Fixed patch attached diff -ur sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/changelog sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/changelog --- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/changelog 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400 +++ sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/changelog 2011-11-02 22:36:55.887998903 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +sgml-data (2.0.7) unstable; urgency=low + + * QA upload. + * fix piuparts failure #647473 + * Lintian fixes + + -- David Steele da...@users.sourceforge.net Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:30:09 -0400 + sgml-data (2.0.6) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. diff -ur sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/control sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/control --- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/control 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400 +++ sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/control 2011-11-02 22:22:33.715998883 -0400 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: text Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org -Standards-Version: 3.8.3 +Standards-Version: 3.9.2 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0) Build-Depends-Indep: xml-core (= 0.06) diff -ur sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/postrm sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/postrm --- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/postrm 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400 +++ sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/postrm 2011-11-06 16:05:53.448000573 -0500 @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ if [ $1 = purge ] then +rm -f /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml /etc/xml/sgml-data.xml.old || : +rm -f /etc/sgml/sgml-data.cat /etc/sgml/sgml-data.cat.old || : rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/sgml rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/xml fi diff -ur sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/rules sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/rules --- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/rules 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400 +++ sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/rules 2011-11-02 22:25:38.843993438 -0400 @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ build: # nothing to be done +build-arch: build +build-indep: build + clean: $(checkdir) find . -name '*.bak' -o -name '*~' | xargs rm -f
