Bug#621435: Still uses libdb4.8
Package: rapidsvn Version: 0.12.0dfsg-3 Severity: normal User: pkg-db-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: db5.1 Your package currently still uses Berkeley DB version 4.8 (libdb4.8). However, there is a newer Berkeley DB version in the archive (libdb5.1), with a compatible API. Berkeley DB version 4.8 will be eventually removed from unstable in favor of version 5.1. Please port your package to libdb5.1 as soon as possible. In most cases only change required is to update build depends from libdb4.8-dev to libdb-dev, or just recompile the package. More complicated scenarios: - Package does check for DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4 - this should be updated to (DB_VERSION_MAJOR > 4) || ((DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4) && (DB_VERSION_MINOR >= XX)). - Configure checks - sometime there is a list of db-4.8 db-4.6 db-4.2, etc., this needs to be updated to just db (or db-5.1 db-5 db), or at least list the 'db' in the front You can see example patch in cyrus-imapd-2.2: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.2.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/99-berkelydb-5.1.dpatch;hb=HEAD - The packages which use Berkeley DB transactional mode need to upgrade the database files before the upgrade. This is fairly straightforward and is well documented on the Berkeley DB website. But you probably already know that because it's not the first Berkeley DB transition. The example script can be found in the cyrus-imapd-2.4 (not yet released): http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.4.git;a=blob;f=debian/cyrus-upgrade-db;hb=HEAD Thanks, -- Ondřej Surý -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers maverick-updates APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500, 'maverick-proposed'), (500, 'maverick-backports'), (500, 'maverick') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110406205721.8114.99557.reportbug@localhost6.localdomain6
Processing of gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.changes
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7zt7-0008ip...@kassia.debian.org
gnuift override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb: package says section is graphics, override says doc. gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb: package says section is graphics, override says perl. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7a7p-0001lt...@franck.debian.org
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb - optional doc gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb - optional perl gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc - source graphics gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb - optional graphics libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb - optional libs libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 506500 616251 620755 620912 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7a7j-0001kv...@franck.debian.org
Bug#620912: marked as done (gnuift: FTBFS (tries to install twice the same file))
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#620912: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #620912, regarding gnuift: FTBFS (tries to install twice the same file) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 620912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620912 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:gnuift Version: 0.1.14-9 Severity: serious Tags: patch, pending Build fails: test -z "/usr/bin" || /bin/mkdir -p "/home/rt/debian/packages/qa/gnuift/gnuift-0.1.14/debian/tmp//usr/bin" /usr/bin/install -c gift-url-to-fts.pl gift-diagnose-print-all-ADI.pl gift-mrml-client.pl CFeedbackClient.pm CFCMovingTarget.pm gift-perl-example-server.pl gift-add-collection.pl gift-remove-collection.pl gift-dtd-to-tex.pl gift-dtd-to-keywords.pl CQueryParadigmMatcher.pm CTripleTransfer.pl CGLDAudreyMTam.pl CGLStructuredAnnotation.pm CGIFTLink.pm CGLDistanceMatrix.pm CGIFTLinkDemo.pl CXMLTreeBuilder.pm CXMLTreeWriter.pm CXMLTreeVisitor.pm CXTVTripletList.pm CXTVWriter.pm CGraphCollection.pm gift-old-to-new-url2fts.pl gift-start.pl gift-diagnose-print-all-ADI.pl '/home/rt/debian/packages/qa/gnuift/gnuift-0.1.14/debian/tmp//usr/bin' /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/home/rt/debian/packages/qa/gnuift/gnuift-0.1.14/debian/tmp//usr/bin/gift-diagnose-print-all-ADI.pl' with `gift-diagnose-print-all-ADI.pl' make[4]: *** [install-binSCRIPTS] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/rt/debian/packages/qa/gnuift/gnuift-0.1.14/build-tree/gift-0.1.14/scripts/perl' make[3]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rt/debian/packages/qa/gnuift/gnuift-0.1.14/build-tree/gift-0.1.14/scripts/perl' make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rt/debian/packages/qa/gnuift/gnuift-0.1.14/build-tree/gift-0.1.14/scripts' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rt/debian/packages/qa/gnuift/gnuift-0.1.14/build-tree/gift-0.1.14' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-install] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 Ubuntu seems to have a patch for that. -Ralf. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gnuift Source-Version: 0.1.14-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnuift, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 620...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ralf Treinen (supplier of updated gnuift package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:46:38 +0200 Source: gnuift Binary: gnuift gnuift-doc libgnuift0c2a libgnuift0-dev libmrml1c2a libmrml1-dev gnuift-perl Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.1.14-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Ralf Treinen Description: gnuift - GNU Image Finding Tool - index and search images by content gnuift-doc - Documentation for gnuift gnuift-perl - GNU Image Finding Tool - per
Bug#621321: marked as done (gnuift: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs)
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#620755: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #620755, regarding gnuift: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 620755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnuift Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. gnuift appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once gnuift is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gnuift Source-Version: 0.1.14-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnuift, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 620...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ralf Treinen (supplier of updated gnuift package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:46:38 +0200 Source: gnuift Binary: gnuift gnuift-doc libgnuift0c2a libgnuift0-dev libmrml1c2a libmrml1-dev gnuift-perl Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.1.14-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Ralf Treinen Description: gnuift - GNU Image Finding Tool - index and search images by content gnuift-doc - Documentation for gnuift gnuift-perl - GNU Image Finding Tool - perl modules libgnuift0-dev - libgnuift development files libgnuift0c2a - GNU Image Finding Tool - libraries libmrml1-dev - libmrml development files libmrml1c2a - Multimedia Retrieval Markup Language Closes: 506500 616251 620755 620912 Changes: gnuift (0.1.14-10) unstable; urgency=l
Bug#620755: marked as done (gnuift: Please stop shipping .la file in -dev packages (Policy 10.2))
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#620755: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #620755, regarding gnuift: Please stop shipping .la file in -dev packages (Policy 10.2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 620755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnuift Version: 0.1.14-9 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch *** /tmp/tmpkuhWTj In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * debian/*-dev.install: Stop shipping la files per Policy 10.2 Dear Maintainer, gnuift ships libtool la files in dev packages. They can simply be removed since thay are not refered to from other packages. See: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt Thanks for considering the patch. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers natty APT policy: (500, 'natty') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -u gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libmrml1-dev.install gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libmrml1-dev.install --- gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libmrml1-dev.install +++ gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libmrml1-dev.install @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ debian/tmp/usr/lib/libMRML*.a -debian/tmp/usr/lib/libMRML*.la debian/tmp/usr/lib/libMRML*.so debian/tmp/usr/include/libMRML debian/tmp/usr/bin/libMRML-config diff -u gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libgnuift0-dev.install gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libgnuift0-dev.install --- gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libgnuift0-dev.install +++ gnuift-0.1.14/debian/libgnuift0-dev.install @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ debian/tmp/usr/lib/libGIFT*.a -debian/tmp/usr/lib/libGIFT*.la debian/tmp/usr/lib/libGIFT*.so debian/tmp/usr/include/libGIFT* --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gnuift Source-Version: 0.1.14-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnuift, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 620...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ralf Treinen (supplier of updated gnuift package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:46:38 +0200 Source: gnuift Binary: gnuift gnuift-doc libgnuift0c2a libgnuift0-dev libmrml1c2a libmrml1-dev gnuift-perl Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.1.14-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Ralf Treinen Description: gnuift - GNU Image Finding Tool - index and search images by content gnuift-doc - Documentation for gnuift gnuift-perl - GNU Image Finding Tool - perl modules libgnuift0-dev - libgnuift development files libgnuift0c2a - GNU Image Finding Tool - libraries libmrml1-dev - libmrml development files libmrml1c2a - Multimedia Retrieval Markup Language Closes: 506500 616251 620755 620912 Changes: gnuift (0.1.14-10) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload * Patch 11_duplicate_install copied from ubuntu: do not try to install twice the same file (closes: #620912). * Add --install to the libtoolize call in debian/rules so that all scripts get installed, rather than just a sel
Bug#616251: marked as done (gnuift: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with doxygen-latex)
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#616251: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #616251,
regarding gnuift: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with
doxygen-latex
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
616251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:gnuift
Version: 0.1.14-9
Severity: minor
User: d...@debian.org
Usertag: doxygen-latex
The package build-depends on doxygen and one or more of the
texlive-* packages, likely it is building some latex/pdf docs
using a doxygen.sty generated by doxygen. The doxygen.sty
generated by doxygen-1.7.3 now depends on even more macros,
so instead of adding more texlive-* dependencies to doxygen,
or adding the texlive-* packages to the build dependencies of
each source package, a new doxygen-latex package was introduced,
depending on all required packages used by doxygen.sty.
.
If the package builds such documentation, please build-depend
on doxygen-latex. If not, please close the report as invalid.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnuift
Source-Version: 0.1.14-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnuift, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 616...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ralf Treinen (supplier of updated gnuift package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:46:38 +0200
Source: gnuift
Binary: gnuift gnuift-doc libgnuift0c2a libgnuift0-dev libmrml1c2a libmrml1-dev
gnuift-perl
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.1.14-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen
Description:
gnuift - GNU Image Finding Tool - index and search images by content
gnuift-doc - Documentation for gnuift
gnuift-perl - GNU Image Finding Tool - perl modules
libgnuift0-dev - libgnuift development files
libgnuift0c2a - GNU Image Finding Tool - libraries
libmrml1-dev - libmrml development files
libmrml1c2a - Multimedia Retrieval Markup Language
Closes: 506500 616251 620755 620912
Changes:
gnuift (0.1.14-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload
* Patch 11_duplicate_install copied from ubuntu: do not try to install
twice the same file (closes: #620912).
* Add --install to the libtoolize call in debian/rules so that all
scripts get installed, rather than just a select few. Patch
provided by James Westby - thanks! (closes: #506500).
* debian/libgnuift0-dev.install, debian/libmrml1-dev.install: do not
install *.la files per Policy 10.2. Thanks to Andreas Moog for the
patch! (closes: #620755).
* replace build-dependencies on doxygen, texlive-* by doxygen-latex
(closes: #616251).
* debian/rules: Packages depend on ${misc:Depends}.
* debian/copyright: update FSF address, symbolic-link to GPL-2 text
* Fix capitalization in some doc-base files.
* Upgraded build-dependency on automake from 1.7 to 1.9 as compilation
with 1.7 fails.
Checksums-Sha1:
04fadcee32c6b7b03aac15a5b79aa8df7e2c913b 1650 gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
ef59a2a2cd18f365b08d5d3cc5e34a997da34de3 22179 gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
45901508eaf3b7436c20bc0b9d81b548fde8c5b1 723200 gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
85cbafd01d324b156566a83857ae040841ad01a3 857
Bug#506500: marked as done (gnuift: Missing --install argument to libtoolize call)
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#506500: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #506500,
regarding gnuift: Missing --install argument to libtoolize call
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
506500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnuift
Version: 0.1.14-9
Severity: normal
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty
Hi,
As shown at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19643691/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.gnuift_0.1.14-9_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
this package can fail to build as the libtoolize call will remove
config.sub. Adding --install to the libtoolize call in debian/rules
will fix this.
Thanks,
James
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnuift
Source-Version: 0.1.14-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnuift, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
to main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 506...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ralf Treinen (supplier of updated gnuift package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:46:38 +0200
Source: gnuift
Binary: gnuift gnuift-doc libgnuift0c2a libgnuift0-dev libmrml1c2a libmrml1-dev
gnuift-perl
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.1.14-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen
Description:
gnuift - GNU Image Finding Tool - index and search images by content
gnuift-doc - Documentation for gnuift
gnuift-perl - GNU Image Finding Tool - perl modules
libgnuift0-dev - libgnuift development files
libgnuift0c2a - GNU Image Finding Tool - libraries
libmrml1-dev - libmrml development files
libmrml1c2a - Multimedia Retrieval Markup Language
Closes: 506500 616251 620755 620912
Changes:
gnuift (0.1.14-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload
* Patch 11_duplicate_install copied from ubuntu: do not try to install
twice the same file (closes: #620912).
* Add --install to the libtoolize call in debian/rules so that all
scripts get installed, rather than just a select few. Patch
provided by James Westby - thanks! (closes: #506500).
* debian/libgnuift0-dev.install, debian/libmrml1-dev.install: do not
install *.la files per Policy 10.2. Thanks to Andreas Moog for the
patch! (closes: #620755).
* replace build-dependencies on doxygen, texlive-* by doxygen-latex
(closes: #616251).
* debian/rules: Packages depend on ${misc:Depends}.
* debian/copyright: update FSF address, symbolic-link to GPL-2 text
* Fix capitalization in some doc-base files.
* Upgraded build-dependency on automake from 1.7 to 1.9 as compilation
with 1.7 fails.
Checksums-Sha1:
04fadcee32c6b7b03aac15a5b79aa8df7e2c913b 1650 gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
ef59a2a2cd18f365b08d5d3cc5e34a997da34de3 22179 gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
45901508eaf3b7436c20bc0b9d81b548fde8c5b1 723200 gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
85cbafd01d324b156566a83857ae040841ad01a3 85726 gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
9fb1ae3fb6603a8310713d872c7fcfdb7a165cb0 117514 gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
0daff41cfb801302f1963b96ce664fff32d15d29 192456
libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
ad3271f907d0d62ef67052769cc16e180c4d458b 256412
libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
5c991530d75046a1babb4baea29092fa3ed3a709 2057
Processing of gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.changes
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7ztv-sz...@franck.debian.org
Processed: merging 621321 620755
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 621321 620755 Bug#620755: gnuift: Please stop shipping .la file in -dev packages (Policy 10.2) Bug#621321: gnuift: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs Merged 620755 621321. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 620755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620755 621321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621321 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1302122507762.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#621343: db4.7: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: db4.7 Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. db4.7 appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once db4.7 is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOV-0001K2-3W@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621333: beecrypt: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: beecrypt Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. beecrypt appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once beecrypt is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOS-0001Gv-9g@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621321: gnuift: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: gnuift Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. gnuift appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once gnuift is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOb-0001QB-6B@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621303: db: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: db Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. db appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once db is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOU-0001Jt-WC@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621282: bacula: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: bacula Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. bacula appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once bacula is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOS-0001Gf-2k@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621253: db4.6: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: db4.6 Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. db4.6 appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once db4.6 is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOV-0001Jx-1p@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621216: ddccontrol: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: ddccontrol Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. ddccontrol appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once ddccontrol is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOV-0001KI-9k@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621144: adplug: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: adplug Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. adplug appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once adplug is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7YOQ-0001FB-Rx@sylvester.codehelp
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb to main/q/qorganizer/qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz to main/q/qorganizer/qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc to main/q/qorganizer/qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb to main/q/qorganizer/qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb Override entries for your package: qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb - optional x11 qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc - source x11 qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb - optional x11 Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7xzx-0004pg...@franck.debian.org
Processing of qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.changes
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7xwi-0004fi...@franck.debian.org
Processing of qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.changes
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7xvy-0008ut...@ravel.debian.org
Re: Join QA team
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:51:30 -0500 Daniel Echeverry wrote: > Hi, > > I'm Daniel Echeverry and I want to join the team to maintain orphans > packages, I've been using free software from 5 years ago, and I love GNU > Debian for your philosophy, quality and great community ! First thing to do is a fair bit of reading. Have you tried doing any packaging already? http://www.debian.org/devel/ From that page, you must read the Policy Manual, Developers Reference and the New Maintainer Guide. It's often good to work with an orphaned package whilst going through these guides. http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/welcome Probably the easiest way to get started is actually to triage some of the bugs outstanding against orphaned packages. Try to reproduce the problems, add comments to those bugs which you can't reproduce. There isn't going to be a lot of advice on this list, the best place for packaging advice is: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/ I don't have time to sponsor uploads, so I can't help much more than point you at other places where you can ask questions and find out how things work. HTH -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgp76KTPi9R8I.pgp Description: PGP signature
Join QA team
Hi, I'm Daniel Echeverry and I want to join the team to maintain orphans packages, I've been using free software from 5 years ago, and I love GNU Debian for your philosophy, quality and great community ! Regards. Daniel -- Epsilon http://www.rinconinformatico.net http://www.fitnessdeportes.com http://www.dragonjar.org Linux user: #477840 Debian user
Processed: Re: Bug#620825: bacula-director-common: wrong email From address
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 620825 by 519567 Bug #620825 [bacula-director-common] bacula-director-common: wrong email From address Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 620825: 519567 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 620825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620825 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13020992996866.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
