Bug#621713: htdig: makes cron noise
Package: htdig Version: 1:3.2.0b6-8 Severity: normal I occasionally het emails from cron like: /etc/cron.daily/htdig: /etc/cron.daily/htdig: line 26: 24973 Terminated lockfile-touch /var/run/htdig.cron 2 possibles fixes: 1) check run_rundig in /etc/default/htdig before locking the file 2) use lockfile-touch -o -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.8 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages htdig depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.7-18lenny7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc11:4.3.2-1.1 GCC support library ii libstdc++6 4.3.2-1.1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii lockfile-progs 0.1.11-0.1Programs for locking and unlocking ii perl 5.10.0-19lenny3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime htdig recommends no packages. Versions of packages htdig suggests: pn htdig-doc (no description available) pn wwwoffle | httpd (no description available) -- debconf information: htdig/run-rundig: false htdig/generate-databases: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110408003628.26583.3.report...@r2d2.ai.cse.unsw.edu.au
Bug#621705: [libvncserver0] New version 0.9.8 available
Package: libvncserver0 Version: 0.9.7-2+b1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- LibVNCServer 0.9.8 was released recently. --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 Debian Release: 6.0.1 500 stable-updates ftp.de.debian.org 500 stable security.debian.org 500 stable ftp.de.debian.org 100 squeeze-backports backports.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==-+-= libc6 (>= 2.7) | 2.11.2-10 libjpeg62 (>= 6b1) | 6b1-1 zlib1g(>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 Package's Recommends field is empty. Suggests (Version) | Installed -+-=== libvncserver0-dbg (= 0.9.7-2+b1) | signature.asc Description: PGP signature
israndom_1.0.7-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: israndom_1.0.7-4.diff.gz to main/i/israndom/israndom_1.0.7-4.diff.gz israndom_1.0.7-4.dsc to main/i/israndom/israndom_1.0.7-4.dsc israndom_1.0.7-4_amd64.deb to main/i/israndom/israndom_1.0.7-4_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: israndom_1.0.7-4.dsc - source science israndom_1.0.7-4_amd64.deb - optional science Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 594286 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7xkx-000424...@franck.debian.org
Processing of israndom_1.0.7-4_amd64.changes
israndom_1.0.7-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: israndom_1.0.7-4.dsc israndom_1.0.7-4.diff.gz israndom_1.0.7-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7xfk-0003vb...@franck.debian.org
cvsps override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.deb: package says section is devel, override says vcs. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7xhr-0001zs...@franck.debian.org
cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: cvsps_2.1-6.debian.tar.gz to main/c/cvsps/cvsps_2.1-6.debian.tar.gz cvsps_2.1-6.dsc to main/c/cvsps/cvsps_2.1-6.dsc cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.deb to main/c/cvsps/cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: cvsps_2.1-6.dsc - source vcs cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.deb - optional vcs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7xhl-0001zi...@franck.debian.org
Processing of cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.changes
cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cvsps_2.1-6.dsc cvsps_2.1-6.debian.tar.gz cvsps_2.1-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7x2w-0008j4...@franck.debian.org
Bug#621655: libifp: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: libifp Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. libifp appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once libifp is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7sg3-0004ld-Ld@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621615: libdiscid: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: libdiscid Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. libdiscid appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once libdiscid is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7sfv-0004is-Ai@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621610: libcdaudio: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: libcdaudio Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. libcdaudio appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once libcdaudio is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7sfu-0004hx-80@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621608: htdig: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: htdig Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. htdig appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once htdig is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7sfr-0004eg-5D@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621579: libiodbc2: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: libiodbc2 Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. libiodbc2 appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once libiodbc2 is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7sg3-0004ll-QN@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#621526: lib3ds: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Package: lib3ds Severity: normal User: codeh...@debian.org Usertags: la-file-removal To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script: http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this post to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html To generate the list of packages, I've used: grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1 The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was parsed. lib3ds appears in this list as a source package because one or more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once lib3ds is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs. If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for clarification. -- Neil Williams = codeh...@debian.org http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Q7sft-0004h7-Bt@sylvester.codehelp
