Bug#770369: bug fix for i386

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:38:30PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > >... > > BTW: I don't use Eterm myself. Can you compile the version in unstable > > under jessie and confirm that it also fixes the 100% CPU problem > > reported here? >

Bug#770369: bug fix for i386

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: >... > BTW: I don't use Eterm myself. Can you compile the version in unstable > under jessie and confirm that it also fixes the 100% CPU problem > reported here? >... What happened with this? Should I prepare a package for jessie-pu?

Bug#858389: marked as done (Memcpy parameter overlap in docbook-to-man)

Your message dated Fri, 12 May 2017 09:18:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#858389: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-36 has caused the Debian Bug report #858389, regarding Memcpy parameter overlap in docbook-to-man to be marked as done. This means

Bug#842635: marked as done (Incorrect output on i386 due to UB)

Your message dated Fri, 12 May 2017 09:18:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#842635: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-36 has caused the Debian Bug report #842635, regarding Incorrect output on i386 due to UB to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Incorrect output on i386 due to UB

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 858389 + pending Bug #858389 [docbook-to-man] Memcpy parameter overlap in docbook-to-man Added tag(s) pending. > tags 842635 + pending Bug #842635 [docbook-to-man] Incorrect output on i386 due to UB Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping

Bug#842635: Incorrect output on i386 due to UB

tags 858389 + pending tags 842635 + pending thanks > Re: Incorrect output on i386 due to UB Applied & uploaded; many thanks! :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-