awffull_3.10.2-6_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 03:51:06 +0300 Source: awffull Binary: awffull Architecture: source Version: 3.10.2-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boris Pek Description: awffull

Processing of awffull_3.10.2-6_source.changes

awffull_3.10.2-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: awffull_3.10.2-6.dsc awffull_3.10.2.orig.tar.gz awffull_3.10.2-6.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#903049: marked as done (awffull: Please do not suggest transitional dummy pkg ttf-dejavu)

Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2018 01:19:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#903049: fixed in awffull 3.10.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #903049, regarding awffull: Please do not suggest transitional dummy pkg ttf-dejavu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#903091: flpsed: Should not suggest to overwrite PDF file when saving

Package: flpsed Version: 0.7.3-3 Severity: normal When a PDF file is opened in flpsed, "Save File as" will suggest to overwrite the original PDF file, even though it can only save the file in PS format. It would be more sensible if it automatically changed the extension to '.ps'. The dialog also

Bug#903049: awffull: Please do not suggest transitional dummy pkg ttf-dejavu

Package: awffull Severity: minor Version: 3.10.2-5 User: 073p...@gmail.com Usertags: fonts-transitional-dummy-pkg-migration Dear maintainer, Your package awffull depends on the following transitional dummy packages: * ttf-dejavu, which should be fonts-dejavu now Please update your dependency

bochs_2.6-6_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 13:52:19 +0200 Source: bochs Binary: bochs bochs-doc bochsbios bochs-wx bochs-sdl bochs-term bochs-x bximage sb16ctrl-bochs Architecture: source Version: 2.6-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

Processing of bochs_2.6-6_source.changes

bochs_2.6-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bochs_2.6-6.dsc bochs_2.6-6.debian.tar.xz bochs_2.6-6_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#902454: marked as done (bochs: FTBFS in buster/sid ('AmlCode' undeclared))

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2018 12:19:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#902454: fixed in bochs 2.6-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #902454, regarding bochs: FTBFS in buster/sid ('AmlCode' undeclared) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#814487: marked as done (bochs: Fix debian/watch file)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2018 12:19:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#814487: fixed in bochs 2.6-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #814487, regarding bochs: Fix debian/watch file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: owner 902454, tagging 902454

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 902454 ! Bug #902454 [src:bochs] bochs: FTBFS in buster/sid ('AmlCode' undeclared) Owner recorded as Stephen Kitt . > tags 902454 + pending Bug #902454 [src:bochs] bochs: FTBFS in buster/sid ('AmlCode' undeclared) Added tag(s) pending. >

Bug#612950: bug still valid

Control: notforwarded -1 Control: tag -1 -wontfix Was marked such by bts-link, wontfixed not because of the bug's value, but because of upstream having switched to systemd. But Debian is not Red Hat, and carries inits that are not , and needs pm-utils or an equivalent. I have no real opinion

Processed: bug still valid

Processing control commands: > notforwarded -1 Bug #612950 [pm-utils] pm-utils: Please don't run disk-spin-up-avoidance hooks on non-rotational devices (such as SSDs) Unset Bug forwarded-to-address > tag -1 -wontfix Bug #612950 [pm-utils] pm-utils: Please don't run disk-spin-up-avoidance hooks