Bug#892756: ulatencyd: fix lua or luajit build dependency

2018-03-15 Thread Frédéric Bonnard
Hi,
well, actually buildd ignore the BD alternatives, always trying the first BD.
But the following should be better :

libluajit-5.1-dev [!s390x !alpha !hppa !ia64 !m68k !powerpcspe !sh4 !sparc64] | 
liblua5.1-0-dev

based on the current support of luajit.

F.

On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:54:12 +0100, Frédéric Bonnard  wrote:
> Package: src:ulatencyd
> Version: 0.5.0-9
> 
> --
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I see that the changelog mentions "Build with libluajit-5.1-dev instead
> of liblua5.1-0-dev if installed."
> But looking at the logs it seems not to follow that and d/control lists
> the lua Build-Depends in that order :
> " liblua5.1-0-dev | libluajit-5.1-dev,"
> I guess that the order should be the opposite.
> 
> Regards.
> F.


pgpftEMlCpShb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


pgpjaD3mssWmb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#892756: ulatencyd: fix lua or luajit build dependency

2018-03-12 Thread Frédéric Bonnard
Package: src:ulatencyd
Version: 0.5.0-9

--

Dear maintainer,

I see that the changelog mentions "Build with libluajit-5.1-dev instead
of liblua5.1-0-dev if installed."
But looking at the logs it seems not to follow that and d/control lists
the lua Build-Depends in that order :
" liblua5.1-0-dev | libluajit-5.1-dev,"
I guess that the order should be the opposite.

Regards.
F.


pgpwzkDeNEYHR.pgp
Description: PGP signature