Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:05:05 +0000
with message-id <e1rkovt-00cxvk...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066464: fixed in liece 2.0+0.20030527cvs-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066464,
regarding liece: FTBFS: dcc.c:128:7: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘sleep’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: liece
Version: 2.0+0.20030527cvs-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -I. -I.. -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection 
> -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE=\"liece\" -DVERSION=\"2.0.0\" -DHAVE_STDIO_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 
> -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 
> -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 
> -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_LIBGEN_H=1 -DHAVE_STRTOUL=1 -DHAVE_MEMMOVE=1 
> -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO=1 -DHAVE_BASENAME=1 -I.   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  
> -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c 
> -o dcc.o dcc.c
> dcc.c: In function ‘prepare_listen_port’:
> dcc.c:128:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sleep’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   128 |       sleep (20);               /* wait 20 seconds and try again */
>       |       ^~~~~
> dcc.c: In function ‘get_address_externally’:
> dcc.c:163:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘close’; did you mean 
> ‘pclose’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   163 |   close(dummy);
>       |   ^~~~~
>       |   pclose
> dcc.c: In function ‘send_file’:
> dcc.c:189:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gethostname’; did you 
> mean ‘gethostbyname’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   189 |   gethostname(namebuf, sizeof (namebuf));
>       |   ^~~~~~~~~~~
>       |   gethostbyname
> dcc.c:205:34: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, 
> but argument 4 has type ‘u_long’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
>   205 |         printf ("DCC send %s %d %u %d\n", ifile, port, addr, 
> statbuf.st_size);
>       |                                 ~^                     ~~~~
>       |                                  |                     |
>       |                                  unsigned int          u_long {aka 
> long unsigned int}
>       |                                 %lu
> dcc.c:205:37: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but 
> argument 5 has type ‘__off_t’ {aka ‘long int’} [-Wformat=]
>   205 |         printf ("DCC send %s %d %u %d\n", ifile, port, addr, 
> statbuf.st_size);
>       |                                    ~^                        
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                     |                               |
>       |                                     int                             
> __off_t {aka long int}
>       |                                    %ld
> dcc.c:209:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘read’; did you mean 
> ‘fread’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   209 |   while ((len = read (ifd, buf, sizeof (buf))) > 0) {
>       |                 ^~~~
>       |                 fread
> dcc.c:210:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘write’; did you mean 
> ‘fwrite’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   210 |     write (ofd, buf, len);
>       |     ^~~~~
>       |     fwrite
> dcc.c: In function ‘receive_file’:
> dcc.c:245:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘lseek’; did you mean 
> ‘fseek’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   245 |     lseek (ifd, 0, 2);
>       |     ^~~~~
>       |     fseek
> dcc.c: In function ‘primary_address_of’:
> dcc.c:342:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inet_addr’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   342 |     addr = inet_addr(host);
>       |            ^~~~~~~~~
> dcc.c: In function ‘chat_listen’:
> dcc.c:370:27: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, 
> but argument 2 has type ‘u_long’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
>   370 |         printf("DCC chat %u %d\n", addr, port);
>       |                          ~^        ~~~~
>       |                           |        |
>       |                           |        u_long {aka long unsigned int}
>       |                           unsigned int
>       |                          %lu
> dcc.c: In function ‘main’:
> dcc.c:397:22: error: implicit declaration of function ‘basename’; did you 
> mean ‘rename’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   397 |   progname = (char *)basename(argv[ 0 ]);
>       |                      ^~~~~~~~
>       |                      rename
> dcc.c:397:14: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size 
> [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
>   397 |   progname = (char *)basename(argv[ 0 ]);
>       |              ^
> dcc.c:442:20: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, 
> but argument 2 has type ‘u_long’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
>   442 |           printf("%u\n", addr);
>       |                   ~^     ~~~~
>       |                    |     |
>       |                    |     u_long {aka long unsigned int}
>       |                    unsigned int
>       |                   %lu
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:372: dcc.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-13_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: liece
Source-Version: 2.0+0.20030527cvs-14
Done: Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
liece, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1066...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (supplier of updated liece package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:37:05 +0100
Source: liece
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0+0.20030527cvs-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org>
Closes: 1066464
Changes:
 liece (2.0+0.20030527cvs-14) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Import history into GIT.
   * Fix building with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration.
     (Closes: #1066464)
   * Enable all hardening flags.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2.
Checksums-Sha1:
 95396ddadcb46dd4a49f75f3503ea5756842141f 1934 liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14.dsc
 abf3bcc1aa81d1ae36755a110ef638a5c64eee3d 13904 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14.debian.tar.xz
 0612180a594bf4606b9c46720754d860bfd15752 10327 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b7742429728103ec4f14e5e791470cc58ea8456ede983036b2282f5126c2ff4c 1934 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14.dsc
 fe27de873eb87bec7e387722d9cb79e885632a9df86b7e87687dd7d89a8e17a8 13904 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14.debian.tar.xz
 ecb44b9461807f60008c9660c7c2654368db075b79e5f02317687534ac3058ff 10327 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14_source.buildinfo
Files:
 dedb7cae1b7ab0ac46ee77018294074d 1934 net optional 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14.dsc
 ae0232e713af5fc72a7a42d6f23a9242 13904 net optional 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14.debian.tar.xz
 2c94eeaafe854cc0ea7c397d44deec4e 10327 net optional 
liece_2.0+0.20030527cvs-14_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=TYiT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpY1skJdLcIi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to