Package: moodle,moodle-book
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date:
Architecture: amd64
Distribution:
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected
On 2013-07-28 09:46, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> The module has been integrated into Moodle proper since version 2.3. I'm
> reassigning the bug to moodle-book and will request removal.
Removal will be one thing, but moodle needs to add Breaks+Replaces or
Conflicts+Replaces to "get rid of it" as well
Hi,
On Saturday, 27. July 2013 11:41:22 Guillem Jover wrote:
> dpkg 1.17.0 is now in unstable, and does not contain the install-info
> compatibility wrapper any longer. These bugs are severity serious now.
if you are going to fix your maintainer scripts, please test upgrades before
uploading. If
Package: bzr-gtk
Version: 0.103.0+bzr792-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sid jessie
Justification: renders package unusable
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
The following packages have unmet depe
Package: qtsmbstatus-server
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due
to insserv rejecting the script header. Some notes are
available from at http://wiki.deb
Package: bochs-svga
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
libsvga1 is gone, so bochs-svga/experimental is no longer installable
and src:bochs/experimental no longer buildable.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian
Control: fixed -1 8.14.4-6
On 2014-06-04 15:44, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> please see http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/06/03/1 for
> details.
That's a trivial patch that I already cherry-picked from 8.14.9 into sid
(there was no CVE at that time).
For some reason the amd64
Package: atm-tools
Version: 1:2.5.1-5.1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
X-Debbugs-Cc: Steve Langasek
atm-tools/experimental has gained two unexpected files, causing file
conflicts on upgrades:
$ debdiff atm-tools_1%3a2.5.1-5_amd64.deb atm-tools_1%3a2.5.1
Followup-For: Bug #1053169
Migration is currently blocked behind the t64 transition.
Andreas
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:03:27 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libast
Version: 0.7-9.1
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
> snprintf.c:45:22: error: unknown type name ‘size_t’
>45 | vsnprintf(char *str, size_t count, const char *fmt, va_li
Followup-For: Bug #1066223
X-Debbugs-Cc: Bastian Germann
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi Bastian,
I've fixed the remaining implicit function declarations and related bugs
in GIT. Do you want to take it from here again?
We should probably fix the nonverbose build in this very special build
system, too
Source: pantalaimon
Version: 0.10.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
pantalaimon FTBFS in sid (but could be built successfully in bookworm):
dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=pybuild
I: pybuild base:311: cd /build/pantalaimon-0.10.5/.pybuild/cpython3_3.11/bu
about
this from the security side?From ade1a2cac3892eedc07a5f2e47db2213950d0d6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Beckmann
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 10:31:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] enable 'O RejectNUL=true' in the default sendmail.cf
---
debian/cf/debian/sendmail.mc.in | 3 +++
debian/cf/feature/re
On 04/05/2024 13.02, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I have patched sendmail in order to enable O RejectNUL=True directive,
but I do not achieved the fact to enable it by default.
Andreas could you get a glimpse at how to render RejectNUL a default ?
Second attempt. Completely untested. This
Package: libgnokii7t64
Version: 0.6.31+dfsg-5.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#copyright
Followup-For: Bug #1071008
I noticed in piuparts that the package is currently uninstallable,
probably related to this bug.
Selecting previously unselected package libx52pro0.
Preparing to unpack .../libx52pro0_0.1.1-3_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libx52pro0 (0.1.1-3) ...
dpkg: error processin
Followup-For: Bug #1065937
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/SparkPost/python-sparkpost/issues/229
Control: tag -1 upstream patch
The python3-distutils dependency is for the autopkgtest.
The autopkgtest already fails in testing and sid due to lack of
python3-six:
41s _ ERR
Package: ddcci-dkms
Version: 0.4.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
ddcci-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 6.10 in experimental:
DKMS make.log for ddcci-0.4.4 for kernel 6.10-rt-amd64 (x86_64)
Tue Jul 23 20:25:02 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/var/lib/dkms/ddcci/0.4.4/build'
make -
Package: librem-ec-acpi-dkms
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
librem-ec-acpi-dkms file to build a module for Linux 6.10:
DKMS make.log for librem_ec_acpi-0.9.2 for kernel 6.10-rt-amd64 (x86_64)
Tue Jul 23 20:25:08 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.10-r
Package: adv-17v35x-dkms
Version: 5.0.7.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream sid trixie
adv-17v35x-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 6.10 in experimental:
DKMS make.log for adv-17v35x-5.0.7.0 for kernel 6.10-cloud-amd64 (x86_64)
Tue Jul 23 20:27:05 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/usr/s
Source: cuneiform
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-10
Severity: serious
cuneiform started to FTBFS when GCC 14 was made the default compiler:
cd /build/cuneiform-1.1.0+dfsg/obj/cuneiform_src/Kern/cfcompat &&
/usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/cfcompat.dir/link.txt --verbose=1
/usr/bin/cc -fPIC -W
Hi Yvan,
thanks for spotting this issue.
On 26/09/2022 13.59, Yvan Masson wrote:
I had a quick look on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sendmail but could
not find where is stored this translation: for my general knowledge,
could you tell me where it is?
These translations are not part of the
On 24/09/2022 11.16, Marco wrote:
Why is sid (that has 8.17.1.9-1) still listed as affected by ALPACA?
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3618
This thread says this is has already been fixed with 8.16.1.
Right now, I see this as fixed in the security tracker, but maybe the
m
Control: severity -1 normal
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 13:26:54 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:dropwatch
Version: 1.5.3-1
dropwatch build times out in the testsuite, no output available in the build
log.
The 1.5.4-1 release built fine on the buildds for all release
architectures. But t
Package: adv-17v35x-dkms
Version: 5.0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
the adv-17v35x-dkms module cannot be built for Linux 6.0:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/a/adv-17v35x/27922615/log.gz
DKMS make.log for adv-17v35x-5.0.6.0 for kernel 6.0.0-2-amd64 (x86_64)
Fri Nov 4 16:55:
Package: planner,planner-data
Version: 0.14.91-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your packages failed to install
because they tries to overwrite each others files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Package: adv-17v35x-dkms
Version: 5.0.6.0-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
adv-17v35x-dkms fails to build the kernel module for Linux 6.1:
DKMS make.log for adv-17v35x-5.0.6.0 for kernel 6.1.0-2-amd64 (x86_64)
Tue Jan 31 16:13:56 UTC 2023
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.1.0-2-amd64'
Followup-For: Bug #1012232
Control: found -1 2.71-3
The problem is still reproducible when rebuilding src:freespace2 in sid
with latest autoconf.
Andreas
Followup-For: Bug #1012232
Control: reassign -1 src:freespace2 3.7.4+repack-1.1
Control: tag -1 sid bookworm
Control: retitle -1 freespace2: missing B-D: pkg-config, libglu1-mesa-dev
The autoconf error is a red herring.
The actual problem are missing
Build-Depends: pkg-config, libglu1-mesa-dev
Package: 9base
Version: 1:6-13
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package leaves modifications
in /etc/shells after upgrading from bullseye to bookworm and purging the
package.
9base/bullseye called add-shell/remov
On 09/05/2023 16.55, Helmut Grohne wrote:
9base/bookworm no longer does, because it now uses dpkg-triggers to
Good to know that there is a better way nowadays ...
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m45.2s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have been modified:
/etc/shells n
Package: awstats
Version: 7.8-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no
Package: librem-ec-acpi-dkms
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
DKMS make.log for librem_ec_acpi-0.9.1 for kernel 6.3.0-1-amd64 (x86_64)
Thu Jun 15 10:09:49 UTC 2023
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.3.0-1-amd64
Package: python3-socketio-client
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package emits a SyntaxWarning
during installation:
Setting up python3-socketio-client (0.6.5-1) ...
/usr/lib/python3/dist-p
Package: kytos-sphinx-theme
Version: 0.0.1+dfsg-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink:
0m29.3s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/share/kytos_sphinx_theme/kytos/static
On 30/07/2023 20.46, Marco wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:28:22 + Marco wrote:
Fedora has some systemd unit files included, maybe these are helpful
here:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/sendmail/sendmail/fedora-rawhide.html#files
Is anybody here working on that issue?
As sendmail
On 31/07/2023 08.52, Marco wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 18:46:11 + Marco wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:28:22 + Marco wrote:
Fedora has some systemd unit files included, maybe these are helpful
here:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/sendmail/sendmail/fedora-rawhide.html#files
Is
Source: propellor
Version: 5.13-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
propellor FTBFS with ghc 9.4 (it still builds fine with 9.0 in testing):
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/propellor/-/jobs/4840519
[139 of 180]
Package: scanbd
Version: 1.5.1-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
X-Debbugs-Cc: Chris Hofstaedtler
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'bookworm'.
It installed fine in 'bookworm', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
This
Package: loop-aes-utils
Version: 2.16.2-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-po
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.40
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there i
Package: gnats-user,gnats
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
The following actions reproduce this:
apt-get install gnats
apt-get remove gnats
dpkg --purge gnats-use
Package: libdoodle1
Version: 0.7.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is not
installable in experimental:
Package: libdoodle1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.
Package: wdm
Version: 1.28-10
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Removing wdm ...
rmdir: failed to remove `/var/run/wdm': No such fi
Package: emacs-jabber
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-polic
Package: gnunet-server
Version: 0.8.1b-8
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-pol
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.42
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/c
Package: webissues-server
Version: 0.8.5-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge due
to a command not found. According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the
depends being available during purge
Package: libswirl-java-gcj
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-po
Package: spread
Version: 3.17.4-4
Followup-For: Bug #613842
Hi,
a also observed this during piuparts tests:
1m23.3s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/tmp/piupartss/tmpRibyIh',
'eatmydata', 'dpkg', '--purge', 'spread']
1m23.5s DUMP:
(Reading database ... 6750 files and directories current
Package: canna
Version: 3.7p3-9
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package removes files that
were installed by another package.
The removed files were already present before the package was installed,
they may have
On 2012-08-11 21:57, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> i cloned from git://anonscm.debian.org/piuparts/piuparts.git let me
> know if i should clone from another repo
branch develop
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 2012-08-11 20:54, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:43:53 -0300, gustavo panizzo wrote:
>
i cannot reproduce this bug using piuparts
>>> Me neither, with piuparts 0.45.
>> what would be the best course of action then?
>
> I hope that Andreas, as the piuparts expert and bu
Package: emacspeak
Version: 29.0-8
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 emacspeak/29.0-6
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/do
With the prerm script gone this issue is fixed for squeeze->sid upgrades
(and squeeze->wheezy upgrades once 1.2.8-par-3 migrates to wheezy), but
the problem (missing conffile) will still exist if the user had any
version from 1.2.8-par-2, ..., 1.2.8-par-2.3 installed.
I don't see an easy solution
Package: canna-utils
Version: 3.7p3-10
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package
Followup-For: Bug #658850
Control: found -1 5.2+dfsg-1
Hi,
the problem is still (or again) reproducible in the latest version:
Selecting previously unselected package libreadline-gplv2-dev:i386.
Unpacking libreadline-gplv2-dev:i386 (from
.../libreadline-gplv2-dev_5.2+dfsg-1_i386.deb) ...
Package: libtomoe0,tomoe-doc
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.
Package: awffull
Version: 3.10.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package uses files from
/usr/share/doc in its maintainer scripts which is a violation of
Policy 12.3: "Packages must not require the existence of an
On 2016-03-02 13:23, Michiel Brandenburg wrote:
> It seems that SOCKETMAP support for 8.15.2 was dropped, this may be
> because of a change in the "default" options between 8.14 and 8.15 but
> it is not consistent.
Good catch, thanks!
Andreas
Source: opencryptoki
Version: 3.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Hi,
opencryptoki FTBFS on kfreebsd (but the 2.3.1 release built there without
problems):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=opencryptoki&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=3.4.1%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1454937298
https://buildd.debian.org/st
Package: pristine-tar
Version: 1.33
Severity: normal
Hi,
pristine-tar gendelta tarball.tar.gz delta1
pristine-tar gendelta tarball.tar.gz delta2
produces two different deltas, mainly due to different timestamps.
It would be great, if pristine-tar could take this into account and
create more easi
Package: python-extractor,python-sfepy
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: found -1 1:0.6-4
Control: found -1 2016.1-1
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency rela
Source: firedns
Version: 0.9.12+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Control: block 811358 with -1
Hi,
firedns Build-Depends and Depends on firedns which has been requested to
be removed. (#811358)
Should firedns be removed as well?
Andreas
Package: python-pygccxml-doc
Version: 1.7.4-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite o
On 2016-05-23 06:19, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Version: 0.28.debian-5
>
> Re-applied all NMUs that were missed in the -4 upload.
Thanks!
Andreas
Followup-For: Bug #808309
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: notfound -1 1.13a+upstream20090219-6
Hi,
I just checked the postrm script. This doesn't work as intended:
test -f /etc/defoma/mgp.subst-rule && rm -f /etc/defoma/mgp.subst-rule
because it always fails if the file does not exist
Control: fixed -1 8.14.8-1
On 2016-06-02 13:50, Andreas Piper wrote:
> The same bug has been reported and fixed on RedHat-Linux with package
> sendmail-8.14.4-9.el6, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1979993
> Could it be possible to implement this fix also on debian?
Can you test a propos
Control: tag -1 help
Hi Kurt,
maybe you can help me getting sendmail (which I'm QA maintaining for
some years now) to work with the new openssl.
On 2016-06-26 12:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/sendmail_8.15.2-4_amd64-20160529-1535
> If y
Package: bogofilter-bdb,bogofilter-sqlite,bogofilter-tokyocabinet
Version: 1.2.4+dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
https
Source: bochs
Version: 2.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
the iasl transitional package is gone, finally. Please switch the B-D to
acpica-tools.
Andreas
Control: severity -1 important
acpica-tools still Provides: iasl
Andreas
On 2016-07-28 02:55, Herbert wrote:
Read these two paragraphs from the original report! This is exactly your
problem!
>> Note that dpkg intentionally does not replace directories with symlinks
>> and vice versa, you need the maintainer scripts to do this.
>> See in particular the end of point 4 i
Package: vlock
Version: 2.2.2-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install,
remove (but not purge), and install again.
Before the second installation the package is in config-files-remaining
state.
Source: cuneiform
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
cuneiform FTBFS in sid since the default compiler was switched to GCC 6:
/build/cuneiform-1.1.0+dfsg/cuneiform_src/Kern/include/utf8-tables.h:1367:1:
erro
Followup-For: Bug #832291
Hi,
there is still something broken. After an upgrade from jessie to stretch
bogofilter-common has lost some of its files:
2m9.4s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot:
debsums: missing file /usr/share/doc/bogofilter-common/NEWS.Debian.gz (from
On 2016-09-12 09:02, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> could you please try if the patch attached works? It compiles :)
Many thanks, so let's just try it :-)
It FTBFS on the non-linux architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sendmail&suite=unstable
It's this part of your pa
Package: libvirtuoso5.5-cil
Version: 6.1.6+dfsg2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severit
Package: dia
Version: 0.97.3+git20160930-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-
Package: dia
Version: 0.97.3+git20160930-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite othe
On 2016-10-29 18:49, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:59:47AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> Hello dear maintainer(s),
>>
>> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
>> currently open in the Wheezy version of sendmail:
>> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tr
Package: imgtex
Version: 0.20050123-9
Severity: serious
Hi,
libapache-mod-fastcgi has been removed from the archive,
libapache-mod-fcgid is a possible (and free) replacement.
Maybe the package can be moved from contrib to main once it
no longer depends on non-free stuff.
Andreas
On 2016-11-08 16:33, Thomas Auge wrote:
> in a recent development, updates started overwriting sendmail.cf, now it
> seems a rebuild is forced on every startup. It's completely unexpected with
> grave implications. Please do not overwrite modified configuration files
> without asking.
Something th
quoting from /etc/mail/sendmail.conf:
# HANDS_OFF="No"; Binary Do *NOT* touch the configuration
# Set this *ONLY* if you are going to be fully responsible for the entire
# setup of sendmail - the directories, permissions, databases, etc. With
# this variable set to "Yes", nothi
On 2016-10-19 08:12, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Hmm (again) ... Maybe file /usr/share/sendmail/sendmail needs updating
> also?
It's generated from the same template script, only the initscript gets
an additional header.
I have a completely untested patch sitting in GIT - do you have a
poss
On 2016-10-31 23:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please go ahead - probably we could use the fix (that someone produces
> for wheezy) for jessie and sid as well. Please put everything into git,
> branch wheezy, the repo is in collab-maint.
I have now a completely untested patch for t
On 2016-12-07 17:12, Axel 'the C.L.A.' Müller wrote:
> Seems this change now causes cron to spam like:
>
> From: root@e560 (Cron Daemon)
> To: root@e560
> Subject: Cron test -x /etc/init.d/sendmail && test
> -x /usr/share/sendmail/sendmail && test -x /usr/lib/sm.bin/sendmail
> && /usr/share/sendm
On 2016-12-08 16:46, Axel 'the C.L.A.' Müller wrote:
> Seems to work fine - at least I'm not getting those mails anymore.
I've now implemented a different way to aquire lockfiles for the
cronjobs, let's hope that does work as well. Just uploaded to unstable.
Andreas
On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:03:43 + John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>* Add Modify_tagged_pointer_structure_js1.8.5.patch to modify tagged
> pointer to use 48 bit virtual address space (Closes: #839048).
Was this issue only present in stretch/sid or is it also present in jessie?
Andreas
On 2016-12-11 11:22, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> following testing after upgrading from 8.15.2-6 to 8.15.2-7,
> sendmail does not accept certain incoming connections anymore
> and refuses the STARTTLS handshake with "ca md too weak".
That is probably because the -7 package got built against openssl 1.
On 2016-12-12 16:51, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> Even in that case, IMHO it would be an idea to mark this bug as
> "won't fix", or even to leave a line in the NEWS.debian, just in
> case this version ever hits stable, as a hint for other CACert users
> (or someone with md5-signatures) out there.
A NE
Hi Graham,
On 2017-01-13 12:47, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Thanks for the upload, Andreas!
you could have done that QA upload yourself (even without filing a bug) :-)
I only cared for it because orphaned packages shouldn't have RC bugs
with patches.
Andreas
Hi Santiago,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:12:13 +0100 Santiago Vila
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:36:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > The toplevel Makefile in the crafty source adds -march=k8 to CFLAGS,
>
> Hi. I checked that a rebuild fixed the issue, but I've also removed
> the -march th
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.46
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Hi Axel,
On 2017-01-21 20:41, Axel Beckert wrote:
> I'm surprised that this doesn't show up on
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/a/apt-build.html despite it's
that's only an error on sid-strict
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid-strict/source/a/apt-build.html
Andreas
Package: python-uniconvertor-dbg
Version: 1.1.5-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
over existing symlinks and possibly overwrites files owned by other
packages. This usually means an o
Package: binutils-m68hc1x
Version: 1:2.18-8
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m30.4s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
Package: snoopy
Version: 2.3.2-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m19.7s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/lib/snoopy
Package: starvoyager
Version: 0.4.4-8
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
starvoyager : Depends: starvoyager-data (
/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libindicate (0.6.92-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * libindicate-gtk3-dev: Depend on libindicate-gtk3-3 instead of
+libindicate-gtk3. (Closes: #715066)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann Fri, 17 Mar 2017 19:35:25 +0100
+
libindicate (0.6.92-3) unstable
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
