Bug#831065: python-kinterbasdb: please make the build reproducible

2016-09-16 Thread Chris Lamb 
> While doing so I found this error:
> 
> remote: Migrating settings from hooks.* to multimailhook.*

This looks like something wrong in the collab-maint git repo; I have no
insight there, alas :)


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#831065: python-kinterbasdb: please make the build reproducible

2016-09-16 Thread Santiago Vila 
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Chris Lamb wrote:

> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> > Source: python-kinterbasdb
> > Version: 3.3.0-2
> > Tags: patch
> 
> There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 63 days, in which
> time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)
> 
> Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?

Hello Chris.

This package is orphaned and it's in collab-maint, so I just went
ahead, pushed your patch to git (with some additional metadata), and
made a QA upload.

While doing so I found this error:

remote: Migrating settings from hooks.* to multimailhook.*
remote: [...]
remote: git_multimail.ConfigurationException: The list of recipients
for refchangelist is not configured.
remote: Please set one of the following:
remote: "multimailhook.refchangelist"
remote: "multimailhook.mailinglist"

If you want to fix this, or explain briefly what's the proper way I
could fix it, I'll apreciate it.

But maybe for another project, because later I realized this one seems
to be obsolete:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695608

Thanks.

Bug#831065: python-kinterbasdb: please make the build reproducible

2016-09-15 Thread Chris Lamb 
Dear Maintainer,

> Source: python-kinterbasdb
> Version: 3.3.0-2
> Tags: patch

There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 63 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)

Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#831065: python-kinterbasdb: please make the build reproducible

2016-07-14 Thread Chris Lamb 
Source: python-kinterbasdb
Version: 3.3.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we
noticed that python-kinterbasdb could not be built reproducibly.

Patch attached.

 [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-
--- a/debian/patches/03_reproducible_build.patch1970-01-01 
02:00:00.0 +0200
--- b/debian/patches/03_reproducible_build.patch2016-07-14 
09:45:51.028259634 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+Author: Chris Lamb 
+Last-Update: 2016-07-14
+
+--- python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0.orig/setup.py
 python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0/setup.py
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ # This horrible tangle of code will soon be blown away and replaced with
+ # something more respectable.  Yep, RSN.
+ 
+-import re, struct, sys, time
++import re, struct, sys, time, os, datetime
+ from StringIO import StringIO
+ 
+ # Exclude old versions of Python:
+@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ if not shouldSkipBuild:
+ 
+ reTimestamp = re.compile(r"^(__timestamp__\s+=\s+')(.*?)(')$", 
re.MULTILINE)
+ initModuleCode = reTimestamp.sub(
+-r'\g<1>%s\g<3>' % time.strftime('%Y.%m.%d.%H.%M.%S.UTC', 
time.gmtime()),
++r'\g<1>%s\g<3>' % 
datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(os.environ.get('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH', 
time.time(.strftime('%Y.%m.%d.%H.%M.%S.UTC'),
+ initModuleCode
+   )
+ 
--- a/debian/patches/series 2016-07-14 09:34:41.760405146 +0200
--- b/debian/patches/series 2016-07-14 09:45:40.540139851 +0200
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 02_drop_removed_fb_defines.patch
+03_reproducible_build.patch