Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures
On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"wrote: > > > I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts > > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and > > > installed on ullmann.debian.org). > > > > > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed. > > > > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck > > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts. > > Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts' > backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1. Thanks! As a result, the uscan output is now fine for the packages that had issues previously, so I'm closing this bug. https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1fonts-kanjistrokeorders+fonts-ricty-diminished+gawk-doc==html#todo Lucas
Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"wrote: > > I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and > > installed on ullmann.debian.org). > > > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed. > > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts. Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts' backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures
On 2016-11-01, James McCoy wrote: > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"wrote: >> I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts >> 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and >> installed on ullmann.debian.org). >> >> To fix that, an update of that backport is needed. > > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts. I don't know how many packages this is impacting, but the watch file for epoptes, which works with stretch's devscripts (2.17.1), is also failing to find a new version on the tracker.debian.org and udd.debian.org pages. It's a little distracting... Thanks for all your work on QA infrastructure, this is a relatively small annoyance in an overall tremendously useful system! live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures
On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"wrote: > I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and > installed on ullmann.debian.org). > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed. I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck package, too, since that was split out of devscripts. Cheers, James