Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2017-08-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
> > > I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
> > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
> > > installed on ullmann.debian.org).
> > >
> > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.
> > 
> > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
> > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.
> 
> Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts'
> backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1.

Thanks!

As a result, the uscan output is now fine for the packages that had
issues previously, so I'm closing this bug.

https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1fonts-kanjistrokeorders+fonts-ricty-diminished+gawk-doc==html#todo

Lucas



Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2017-05-29 Thread James McCoy
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
> > I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
> > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
> > installed on ullmann.debian.org).
> >
> > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.
> 
> I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
> package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.

Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts'
backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1.

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7  2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB



Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2017-02-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-11-01, James McCoy wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
>> I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
>> 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
>> installed on ullmann.debian.org).
>>
>> To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.
>
> I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
> package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.

I don't know how many packages this is impacting, but the watch file for
epoptes, which works with stretch's devscripts (2.17.1), is also failing
to find a new version on the tracker.debian.org and udd.debian.org
pages. It's a little distracting...


Thanks for all your work on QA infrastructure, this is a relatively
small annoyance in an overall tremendously useful system!


live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures

2016-11-01 Thread James McCoy
On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum"  wrote:
> I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
> 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
> installed on ullmann.debian.org).
>
> To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.

I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.

Cheers,
James