Package: dolphin
Version: 4:4.13.1-1
Severity: normal
* What led up to the situation?
Debian experimental is missing libbaloowidgets package
* What outcome did you expect instead?
Add libbaloowidgets to debian archive and rebuild dolphin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/si
Package: dolphin
Version: 4:4.13.1-1
Severity: normal
* What led up to the situation?
libbaloowidgets isn't available in debian experimental archive
* What outcome did you expect instead?
create libbaloowidgets package
rebuild dolphin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:09:21 -0300
Source: qtserialport-opensource-src
Binary: libqt5serialport5 libqt5serialport5-dev qtserialport5-dbg
qtserialport5-doc qtserialport5-doc-html
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 5.3
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jun 2014 03:52:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751799: fixed in qtserialport-opensource-src 5.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #751799,
regarding libqt5serialport5-dev: Fails to open a port that do not implement the
full feature set
to be marked as d
qtserialport-opensource-src_5.3.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libqt5serialport5_5.3.0-3_amd64.deb
libqt5serialport5-dev_5.3.0-3_amd64.deb
qtserialport5-dbg_5.3.0-3_amd64.deb
qtserialport5-doc_5.3.0-3_all.deb
qtserialport5-doc-html_5.3.0-3_all.
tag 751799 pending
thanks
[snip]
> Hi Giulian!
>
> 5.3.1 is scheduled to go out this week, so it's just a matter of waiting a
> little more :)
Let's shorten that waiting time ;-)
--
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
the following formula:
pi zz a
Lisandro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 751799 pending
Bug #751799 [libqt5serialport5-dev] libqt5serialport5-dev: Fails to open a port
that do not implement the full feature set
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
I am trying to get kimpanel to work with my installation but the
documentation and feedback I get from the system (~ zero) makes difficult
to know what is going on.
What I have done:
- Using Debian Jessie with all latest packages updated.
- Installed ibus, ibus-anthy, ibus-mozc, plasma-widget-ki
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 751753
Bug #751753 [kontact] kontact: upgrade failure due to file conflict
Bug 751753 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
751753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 751753
Bug #751753 {Done: Matt Palmer } [kontact] kontact: upgrade
failure due to file conflict
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
B
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:48:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751753: fixed in dns323-firmware-tools 0.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #751753,
regarding kontact: upgrade failure due to file conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 751799 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-38640
Bug #751799 [libqt5serialport5-dev] libqt5serialport5-dev: Fails to open a port
that do not implement the full feature set
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugreports.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous
> > comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso.
> > But if you state so -- must be so.
> There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses
> virtuos
Package: libqt5serialport5-dev
Version: 5.3.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
There is a bug on this version of the Qt serial port library that prevents
opening of ports that do not implement RTS (Request To Send) and DTR (Data
Terminal Ready) -- like /dev/pts/* devices. This prob
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:43:25 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous
> comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso.
> But if you state so -- must be so.
There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those
> binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1?
The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in the archive. And no,
it is not compatible with somet
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:10:58 -0300
Source: qt4-x11
Binary: libqtcore4 qtcore4-l10n libqt4-core libqtgui4 libqt4-gui libqt4-network
libqt4-opengl libqt4-script libqt4-scripttools libqt4-sql libqt4-sql-ibase
libqt4-sql-mys
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those
> > binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1?
> The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in th
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:32:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#741190: fixed in qt4-x11 4:4.8.6+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #741190,
regarding qt4-x11: Improve atomic support on parisc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:32:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#747988: fixed in qt4-x11 4:4.8.6+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #747988,
regarding qt4-x11: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.6)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
qt4-x11_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libqtcore4_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
qtcore4-l10n_4.8.6+dfsg-2_all.deb
libqt4-core_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libqtgui4_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libqt4-gui_4.8.6+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libqt4-network_4.8.6+dfsg
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be
> > not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I
> > misunderstanding?
> I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can
On Monday 16 June 2014 11:51:39 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
[snip]
> do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be
> not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I
> misunderstanding?
I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can not
ha
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Hi Tim,
> > We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
> > http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an
> > alternative source and I see that you have done some work to upd
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Tim Haynes wrote:
> We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
> [2]http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack
> as an
> alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update
> package
On Friday 13 June 2014 09:37:48 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
> http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an
> alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package
On 13 June 2014 14:37, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
> http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as
> an
> alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package
> (fro
See also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333035
where a workaround is described as well.
--
Johan Spee
www.coonsden.com
Eve Ryth in Gisgon na Beal Right
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 18:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Preparing to unpack .../kontact_4%3a4.13.1-1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking kontact (4:4.13.1-1) over (4:4.12.4-1) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /var/cache/apt/archives/kontact_4%3a4.13.1-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite
> '
Package: kontact
Version: 4:4.13.1-1
Severity: serious
I experienced an upgrade failure due to a file conflict with korganizer:
Preparing to unpack .../kontact_4%3a4.13.1-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking kontact (4:4.13.1-1) over (4:4.12.4-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/k
30 matches
Mail list logo
