Hi Brian and Andrew,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:02:46PM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 16:44:31 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
>
> > On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 14:09:27 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >
> > > Severity 911844 normal
> >
> > It would be useful to know the reason why
On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 16:44:31 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 14:09:27 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > Severity 911844 normal
>
> It would be useful to know the reason why the severity has been reduced
> to normal. I would have thought a confidential document should
Hello,
I just find that it works with Qdialog or Widget it just fail when i
edit QApplicationwindow
Regards
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:53:13 +
Source: grantlee5
Architecture: source
Version: 5.1.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Krap Maintainers
Changed-By: Ivo De Decker
Closes: 917711
Changes:
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:33:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#917711: fixed in grantlee5 5.1.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #917711,
regarding grantlee5: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j2
test ARGS\+=-j2 returned exit code 2
to be marked
grantlee5_5.1.0-2.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grantlee5_5.1.0-2.1.dsc
grantlee5_5.1.0-2.1.debian.tar.xz
grantlee5_5.1.0-2.1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #917711 [src:grantlee5] grantlee5: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: cd
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && make -j2 test ARGS\+=-j2 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
917711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917711
Debian
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi Giovanni,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I triaged and submitted upstream this bug:
>
> https://github.com/steveire/grantlee/issues/51
>
> The upstream bug contains my current understanding of the bug and asks
> for
8 matches
Mail list logo