Processed: Re: Bug#932808: baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster

2019-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #932808 [baloo-kf5] baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 932808: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932808 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#932808: baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster

2019-08-07 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Dear Maintainer, I think the top frames with debug symbols would look like this: (gdb) bt #0 memcpy () in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x7feaa926d05d in Baloo::PostingCodec::decode () at ./src/codecs/postingcodec.cpp:42 #2 0x0

Bug#932808: baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster

2019-08-07 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Hello Leoš Pohl, thanks for the additional information. Please use the reply-all in your email program, to have the ...@bugs.debian.org recipient in every answer, so the debian bug tracker receives the messages too. Just for future crashes (or if the Mainainter will requests it), if you install t

Bug#934185: libkscreenlocker5: fails to accept correct pin after entering pin less than 6 chars with libpam-poldi

2019-08-07 Thread Jason Franklin
Package: libkscreenlocker5 Version: 5.14.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Greetings, I am working on a machine that is configured to use libpam-poldi for user authentication with GPG smart cards. When the screen locker is engaged and the user enters a PIN that is u

Bug#932808: Fwd: Bug#932808: baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster

2019-08-07 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Weitergeleitete Nachricht Datum: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:44:44 -0400 Von:Leoš Pohl Hello Bernhard, since I could not find a way to forward the report directly to this bug, please find screenshots here https://snag.gy/mpTyWe.jpg and here https://snag.gy/lUKpRc.jpg and the cop

Processed: Re: Bug#932808: baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster

2019-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #932808 [baloo-kf5] baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 932808: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932808 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@b

Bug#932808: baloo-kf5: Upon start baloo crashes with Segmentation fault following upgrade to buster

2019-08-07 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hello Leos Pohl, you write when you execute "balooctl enable" you receive some lines starting with "KCrash: ...". When this happened, is there a small sad smiley [1] in the system tray (normally at the bottom, left of the clock)? If yes, you should receive by clicking

Bug#933952: qtbase5-examples: many qtbase5-examples fail to compile - w/solution

2019-08-07 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Mike! I agree with Lisandro that for many people it will be enough to just run the examples, not (re-)compile them. So we should not add these dependencies, at most we can add some of these packages to Suggests. But see below: On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 06:53:52AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > A dir

Bug#933952: marked as done (qtbase5-examples: many qtbase5-examples fail to compile - w/solution)

2019-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:42:38 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#933952: More info has caused the Debian Bug report #933952, regarding qtbase5-examples: many qtbase5-examples fail to compile - w/solution to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#933952: More info

2019-08-07 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi Mike! El mié., 7 ago. 2019 01:59, Mike Bird escribió: > On Tue August 6 2019 11:10:46 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > Hi! Somehow this bug got lost within my mail. But looking at it I > > still can't fully understand what the bug is really about