On Sat, Nov 07 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> I support that approach for most cases, but it doesn't scale for teams like
> KDE that have only a small number of maintainers, an impressive amount of
> packages and a large number of reported bugs (and a tremendous amount of
>
On Thu, Nov 05 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
>> Just saying "install cups-bsd" is not actually a
>> good solution to the problem. If for whatever reason the user doesn't
>> have cups-bsd installed, they have no way to know that the problem is
>> the lack of that package. In
On Wed, Nov 04 2015, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Okular already Recommends cups-bsd, so reopening the bug that suggests it be
> added makes no sense.
Hi, Scott. I appreciate the response, but I still think we're missing
the point. The real question is, if the bug was fixed,
On Wed, Nov 04 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Please avoid reopening old bugs, it's better to ask in the debian-kde users
> list or in the #debian-kde irc channel, if that wouldn't help then open a new
> one. The issue that was reported here was fixed: cups-bsd was added
Package: kde-runtime
Version: 4:4.14.2-2
Severity: normal
What is this program and what is it supposed to do?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
5 matches
Mail list logo