Various issues with pyside2

(Please CC me on reply) Hello, we need your help to support pyside2 on mipsel and mips64el. mips64el test failures -- First on mips64el we had this report of failing tests: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945421 But after a while the package managed to

Re: pyside2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Version: 5.13.2-1 On Sat, 16 Nov 2019, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:35:29 + Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: src:pyside2 > > Version: 5.11.2-3 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: sid bullseye > > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: py2removal > > version 5.13.2-1

Bug#943709: Pyside2 package dependencies do not reflect Python module dependencies

Hi, On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Mark Weyer wrote: > Package: python3-pyside2.qtgui > Version: 5.11.2-3+rpi1 > Severity: normal > > This bug is reported against an example package but is more general. Thus it > pertains to more binary packages built from the same source package pyside2 Can you be a bit

Re: Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.

Hi, On Sun, 13 Jan 2019, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Test cases that passed in patchelf 0.8 fail since 0.9, > and segmentation fault on things like setting rpath > might be close enough to "entirely broken". In that case, it would certainly help upstream if someone (maintainer/porter) could try to "git

Re: Bug#917199: pivy, unbuildable on mips* due to testsuite failures in patchelf.

Hi, On Sat, 12 Jan 2019, Adrian Bunk wrote: > pyside2 is now built without patchelf on mips64el. > > Doing the same for mips and mipsel should fix the problem for pivy. Yeah, but this is not going in the right direction. This means that pyside will be built with the embedded patchelf. The

Bug#881333: Qt with GLES on arm64 maintainer's decision - Was:: Upcoming Qt switch to OpenGL ES on arm64

Hello Lisandro, TLDR: thank you for starting this discussion, it was required as it's not an easy decision to take as there is no realistic perfect solution, but I believe you took the wrong decision. Please consider deferring the decision to the technical committe by seeking his advice (point

Bug#881333: qtbase5-dev: Rebuild qtbase with OpenGL ES support for arm64

Control: reopen -1 hert...@debian.org Hello, On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Could you please rebuild qtbase with OpenGL ES acceleration on ARM64 > > instead so as to provide a better user experience on these devices? > > As discussed on IRC, it means beaking

Re: Bug#877871: RFP: pyside2 -- Python bindings for Qt5

Control: tag -1 pending Hello all, we have made good progress on the pyside2 packaging. Yesterday we had working packages built against Qt 5.10 that we managed to use to rebuild freecad and the application was working. We worked in our own repository at the start:

Re: RFP: pyside2 -- Python bindings for Qt5

Hi, On Fri, 11 May 2018, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > Sophie and me are working to bring pyside2 into Debian. We would like to > > put it in pkg-kde-extras. I requested access to the salsa group for this. > > Welcome to the team! Thank you. Note that you granted me "developer" access which

Re: RFP: pyside2 -- Python bindings for Qt5

Control: retitle -1 ITP: pyside2 -- Qt for Python Control: owner -1 sop...@freexian.com On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 10:09:38 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > Moreover, if I read the [announcement] correctly, it seems that PySide2 > is going to be renamed as "Qt for Python" and

Wheezy update of kde4libs?

Hello Maximiliano and other KDE maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of kde4libs: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/kde4libs Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please

Re: desktop-base: Integration with KDE's plasma-desktop seems to no longer work with current version

Hi, On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > So is there anyone from the KDE team who is willing to investigate and > update the required integration? (Or at least provide initial guidance in > this bug report so that others can pick it up) I looked further into this issue but I qu

Re: desktop-base: Integration with KDE's plasma-desktop seems to no longer work with current version

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > $ cat kde-wallpaper/10-desktop-base.js > > // Placed in /usr/share/kde4/apps/plasma-desktop/init/ > > yeah. that looks kind of old. > > > (This has been identified on a Kali Linux system but I have all the > > reasons to believe that it also applies

Bug#747637: akonadi-server: upgrade to akonadi-12-1-1 does not work so kmail too

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hello Markus Merlin, you reported that you were affected by Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747637 Maximiliano believes that the latest update 1.13.0-1 should fix the db upgrade problems (see below). Can you confirm this so that we can

Bug#532585: konqueror: please add dependency on install-info

On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote: Please also make sure that kdebase takes quite some time to build on most architectures, so uploading it just for a fix of a bug of severity: normal is often a waste of everybodys time. The bug will be serious as soon as we upload dpkg with the

Bug#398735: ktouch: Many keyboard layouts missing

Package: ktouch Version: Many keyboard layouts missing Severity: important The latest upstream release, rather than fixing the allegedly broken keyboard layouts, simply removed them from the build process (see keyboard_DATA in ./kdeedu-3.5.5/ktouch/keyboards/Makefile.in and corresponding