On mar., 2015-03-10 at 10:02 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have
those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs'
service files
If they do not interact with plymouth themselves like gdm does, then it
is
On mar., 2015-03-03 at 03:59 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
I am quite positive that some missing gettys because of two DMs being
installed in parallel (or some similar normal thing that people might
do) will definitely be worth a freeze exception.
IMHO, if gettys don't come up properly, the
Hi all, hi Yves-Alexis,
On Mo 02 Mär 2015 21:30:49 CET, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2015-03-01 at 21:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have
those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs'
service files;
On dim., 2015-03-01 at 21:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have
those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs'
service files; they should probably gain those lines too. However,
because they participate in
4 matches
Mail list logo
