Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On 29/12/15 22:37, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > Just a little nudge here again! > Ubuntu 16.04 (which is a Long Term Support release) has a Debian Import > Freeze on the February 18th, and for Virtuoso 7.2 to make it in, it should > have an update in Debian well before that. > I'm neither an Ubun

Re: Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

Hi all! Just a little nudge here again! Ubuntu 16.04 (which is a Long Term Support release) has a Debian Import Freeze on the February 18th, and for Virtuoso 7.2 to make it in, it should have an update in Debian well before that. I'm neither an Ubuntu or Virtuoso user, but I think it is impo

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

Hi all! Since there shouldn't be any obstacles in terms of version dependencies, I figure I'll just bump everyone. I'm not using Virtuoso these days, but I think it is important for the Semantic Web community that the most recent version is in there, and I hope it can be fixed so that it can en

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

¡Hola Tim! El 2015-02-03 a las 17:22 +, Tim Haynes escribió: OK, it's been a little more than a couple of days even by my standards. But we have things to show!  Well, jessie was released and as such, we can try to work on the packages hand passing. The current develop/7 branch on githu

Re: Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Tuesday 03 February 2015 17:22:11 Tim Haynes wrote: [snip] > It seems this would be a fortuitous moment to ask: if I'm wanted to be > regarded as the VOS maintainer in Debian, how do I go about officially > signing on? First you need to wait until us the current maintainers orphan the package.

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

Nice work! Cheers, Nolan On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > On Tuesday 3. February 2015 17.22.11 Tim Haynes wrote: > > OK, it's been a little more than a couple of days even by my standards. > > :-) > > > But we have things to show! > > The current develop/7 branch on git

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Tuesday 3. February 2015 17.22.11 Tim Haynes wrote: > OK, it's been a little more than a couple of days even by my standards. :-) > But we have things to show! > The current develop/7 branch on github > contains a completely > revamped debian/

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On 2 October 2014 at 09:24, Tim Haynes wrote: > > I'm working with the other VOS admin/developers here to get this branch >> > published on github, so that will at least give something concrete to >> test and >> > we can take it from there how it makes its way into Debian. >> >> Currently we are

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On 1 October 2014 17:20, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > El 2014-10-01 a las 12:41 +0100, Tim Haynes escribió: > > On 1 October 2014 12:07, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > > I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting > Virtuoso 7 > > into Debian proper? > > > Hi, thanks for

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Wednesday 01 October 2014 13:07:13 Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > Hi all! > Alternatively, a more conservative approach is to upload 6.1.8 to unstable, > and 7.1 to experimental. If no problems occurs with 6.1.8, it is likely that > the assumption that exactly 6.1.6 is required is wrong, then 6.1.8 m

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

¡Hola Tim! El 2014-10-01 a las 12:41 +0100, Tim Haynes escribió: > On 1 October 2014 12:07, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting Virtuoso > 7 > into  Debian proper? > Hi, thanks for the wake-up call... > I did a bit of work on this a

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On 1 October 2014 12:07, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting Virtuoso 7 > into Debian proper? > Hi, thanks for the wake-up call... I did a bit of work on this a few months ago - essentially porting the Ubuntu package structure to Debian (II

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

Hi all! I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting Virtuoso 7 into Debian proper? Jessie freezes soon, so it'll have to happen very soon now, if it is to go in. If it has to go through the NEW queue, my guess is that it is already too late. However, we have the word of

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous > > comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso. > > But if you state so -- must be so. > There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses > virtuos

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Monday 16 June 2014 12:43:25 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous > comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso. > But if you state so -- must be so. There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those > binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1? The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in the archive. And no, it is not compatible with somet

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those > > binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1? > The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in th

Re: Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be > > not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I > > misunderstanding? > I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Monday 16 June 2014 11:51:39 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: [snip] > do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be > not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I > misunderstanding? I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can not ha

Re: Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to > > http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an > > alternative source and I see that you have done some work to upd

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Tim Haynes wrote: > We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian.  I was referred to > [2]http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack > as an > alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update > package

Re: Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On Friday 13 June 2014 09:37:48 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Tim, > > We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to > http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an > alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

On 13 June 2014 14:37, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Tim, > > We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to > http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as > an > alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package > (fro

Bug#689230: virtuoso 7.1 to Debian proper [Was: Bug#689230: new version is needed!]

Hi Tim, We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package (from Ubuntu) for the 7.1 release. Since you had some experience wi