Bug#917107: marked as done (qtwayland-opensource-src: Check if CMake files for plugins need to be removed)

2020-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:06:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#917107: fixed in qtwayland-opensource-src 5.15.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #917107, regarding qtwayland-opensource-src: Check if CMake files for plugins need to be removed to be marked as done

Processed: libopenbabel-dev: CMake files do not reflect installation paths

2020-07-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel/issues/2264 Bug #966405 [libopenbabel-dev] libopenbabel-dev: CMake files do not reflect installation paths Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel/issues/2264'. > block

Bug#917107: qtwayland-opensource-src: Check if CMake files for plugins need to be removed

2019-03-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:45:02PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Isn't Qt5Gui_QWaylandEglPlatformIntegrationPlugin.cmake just a cmake file > for finding a plug-in (and this other associated ones)? If that's the case > then it's off no use for us. Yes it is. Most probably I

Bug#917107: qtwayland-opensource-src: Check if CMake files for plugins need to be removed

2019-03-20 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El lun., 18 mar. 2019 16:51, Dmitry Shachnev escribió: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 03:37:27PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer wrote: > > The correct fix for > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwayland-opensource-src/+bug/1806186 > > might be removing/patching cmake file for

Bug#917107: qtwayland-opensource-src: Check if CMake files for plugins need to be removed

2019-03-18 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 03:37:27PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > The correct fix for > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwayland-opensource-src/+bug/1806186 > might be removing/patching cmake file for plugins. Just for the record, Qt’s

Bug#917107: qtwayland-opensource-src: Check if CMake files for plugins need to be removed

2018-12-22 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Source: qtwayland-opensource-src Version: 5.11.2-3 Severity: normal The correct fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwayland-opensource-src/+bug/1806186 might be removing/patching cmake file for plugins. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable

Bug#908558: marked as done (qttools5-dev-tools: Missing cmake files in package)

2018-09-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:38:41 +0300 with message-id <20180911073841.ga2...@mitya57.me> and subject line Re: Bug#908558: qttools5-dev-tools: Missing cmake files in package has caused the Debian Bug report #908558, regarding qttools5-dev-tools: Missing cmake files in p

Bug#908558: qttools5-dev-tools: Missing cmake files in package

2018-09-11 Thread Holger Mickler
Package: qttools5-dev-tools Version: 5.11.1-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, https://packages.debian.org/buster/amd64/qttools5-dev-tools/filelist says that there should be /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt5LinguistTools/*.cmake files. But there are no such files: $ dpkg -l qttools5-dev

Bug#793347: marked as done (CMake files for lupdate/lrelease should probably go in -dev-tools)

2015-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:19:27 + with message-id <e1znx0p-0006et...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#793347: fixed in qttools-opensource-src 5.5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #793347, regarding CMake files for lupdate/lrelease should probably go in -dev

Bug#793347: CMake files for lupdate/lrelease should probably go in -dev-tools

2015-07-22 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Source: qttools-opensource-src Version: 5.4.2-2 Severity: normal Felix pointed out on IRC that the CMake files for linguist, namely everything under /usr/lib/a-t/cmake/Qt5LinguistTools/, should probably better shipped in qttools5-dev-tools instead of qtbase5-dev. The reason is simple

Re: cmake files

2014-06-03 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hi, Files: cmake/* Copyright: UNKNOWN License: GPL-2+ more or less , yepp but with a corect copyright holders :) Licensecheck didn't bring any .cmake files even in tarball i use exists cmake directory. The problem is that licenscheck do not search for cmake files with standard settings

Bug#729602: marked as done (Do not ship cmake files for finding where the SQL plugins are)

2013-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:00:17 + with message-id e1vrbit-0007fc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#729602: fixed in qtbase-opensource-src 5.2.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #729602, regarding Do not ship cmake files for finding where the SQL plugins

Re: Qt5: Private headers not installed by still referenced in cmake files

2013-08-12 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Sunday 11 August 2013 18:06:03 Yannick Roehlly wrote: Hi Lisandro, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Now if this happens in the rebuilt packages, please do fill a bug. OK, I'll do that. A few moments ago I pushed qt5webkit to unstable, feel free to test it :) (you may need

Re: Qt5: Private headers not installed by still referenced in cmake files

2013-08-12 Thread Yannick Roehlly
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: A few moments ago I pushed qt5webkit to unstable, feel free to test it :) (you may need to wait for the next dinstall + mirror syncing to get it). Hi Lisandro, Sigil compilation works with the unstable packages. Thanks. Yannick -- Linux is not

Re: Qt5: Private headers not installed by still referenced in cmake files

2013-08-11 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Saturday 10 August 2013 18:22:13 Yannick Roehlly wrote: Hi all, While compiling sigil, I noticed that for some Qt5 modules the private headers are not installed but are still referenced in the .cmake files. For instance, for libqt5webkit5-dev, when compiling sigil I have this error

Re: Qt5: Private headers not installed by still referenced in cmake files

2013-08-11 Thread Yannick Roehlly
Hi Lisandro, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Now if this happens in the rebuilt packages, please do fill a bug. OK, I'll do that. Regards, Yannick -- La vida es agradable. La muerte es pacífica. Lo problemático es la transición. --- Isaac Asimov -- To

Qt5: Private headers not installed by still referenced in cmake files

2013-08-10 Thread Yannick Roehlly
Hi all, While compiling sigil, I noticed that for some Qt5 modules the private headers are not installed but are still referenced in the .cmake files. For instance, for libqt5webkit5-dev, when compiling sigil I have this error: CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/cmake/Qt5WebKit