Meh, Debian revisions builds > -1 do not include the source by
default. I'll just re upload -1, it has never been really in the
archive.
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 21:58, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 21:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
> >
>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 21:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
>
> Reuploaded. Late for Buster, but uploaded non the less.
Correcting myself: maybe not, first freeze is the transitions one.
Reuploaded. Late for Buster, but uploaded non the less.
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 07:10, Bastian Blank
wrote:
>
>
> Please don't re-use versions.
>
> Also you still did not provide the correct license of several files:
>
> po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause,
> so
Hi
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 08:28:34AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 07:10:09 -03 Bastian Blank escribió:
> > Please don't re-use versions.
> I understand that by: "if you uploaded 1.2.3-1 don't reupload 1.2.3-1, bu
> better 1.2.3-2" Is that
Hi Bastian!
El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 08:52:14 -03 Bastian Blank escribió:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 08:28:34AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> > El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 07:10:09 -03 Bastian Blank escribió:
> > > Please don't re-use versions.
> >
> > I
Hi Thorsten!
El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 08:44:04 -03 Thorsten Alteholz escribió:
> Hi Lisandro,
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> >> po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause,
> >> so "LGPL-2.1+ or LGPL-3+" is incorrect.
> >
> >
Hi Lisandro,
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause,
so "LGPL-2.1+ or LGPL-3+" is incorrect.
Fair, but does it *really* deserves a reject? The license is still dfsg
compliant and there is only one
Hi Bastien! This observations did create me some doubts, so:
El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 07:10:09 -03 Bastian Blank escribió:
> Please don't re-use versions.
I understand that by: "if you uploaded 1.2.3-1 don't reupload 1.2.3-1, bu
better 1.2.3-2" Is that right? If it is: what's the problem?
Please don't re-use versions.
Also you still did not provide the correct license of several files:
po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause,
so "LGPL-2.1+ or LGPL-3+" is incorrect.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your
(forwarding reject notes)
REJECT
* applets/* is GPL3+
* po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause
* some attributions missing
* software looks interesting
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if
10 matches
Mail list logo
