Bug#675192: cantor: New upstream release

2012-05-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: cantor Severity: wishlist Hello, Could you consider the packaging of the version 4.8 of cantor ? It provides a scilab backend. For information, Ubuntu ships cantor 4.8.3 Thanks, Sylvestre -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (600,

Bug#836608: qtcreator: Please use llvm 3.8 or, better, 3.9

2016-09-04 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: qtcreator Severity: important Control: block 836604 by -1 Hello, This package depends on llvm-toolchain-3.6. To limit the number of llvm versions in the next Debian stable, we would like all packages using/depending llvm/clang/lldb to move to version 3.8 or 3.9 so that we can remove

Bug#846410: Help needed with llvm bug

2016-12-16 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Le 16/12/2016 à 13:49, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > On martes, 13 de diciembre de 2016 11:50:02 ART Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer wrote: >> Hi LLVM maintainers! >> >> We currently have an LLVM-related bug on kdevelop (#846410). It seems that >> if the user is

Bug#873414: qtcreator: Please update to llvm-toolchain 4.0 or, better, 5.0

2017-08-27 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: qtcreator Severity: normal Hello, Currently, we have 6 versions of the llvm toolchain in the archive. I would like to move to 3 versions (4.0, 5.0 and snapshot, aka 6.0) Could you please update your package to use 4.0 (or, better, 5.0 which will be released very soon)? I will update

Bug#873411: kdevelop: Please update to llvm-toolchain 4.0 or, better, 5.0

2017-08-27 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: kdevelop Severity: normal Hello, Currently, we have 6 versions of the llvm toolchain in the archive. I would like to move to 3 versions (4.0, 5.0 and snapshot, aka 6.0) Could you please update your package to use 4.0 (or, better, 5.0 which will be released very soon)? I will update

Bug#912794: qtcreator: Please switch to llvm-toolchain-7

2018-11-03 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: qtcreator Severity: normal Hello, llvm-toolchain-7 is now the default version in Debian. As part of the effort to keep the number of llvm-toolchain versions under control, it would be great if you could update to llvm-toolchain-7. Thanks, Sylvestre

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello Le 18/11/2018 à 12:30, Roman Lebedev a écrit : Package: qtcreator Version: 4.7.2-2 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 If kit is gcc, the project (any fresh one i open) is parsed normally. All the symbols are resolved, and i can go to the definition. If

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 18/11/2018 à 20:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > clone 914002 -1 > reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 > affects -1 qtcreator > thanks > > El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 10:18:03 -03 Adam Majer escribió: >> On 2018-11-18 12:30 p.m., Roman Lebedev wrote: >>>

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-12-26 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 26/12/2018 à 21:30, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : Sylvestre: if I understand correctly (please correct me if I am wrong) you broke ABI without a transition. That's simply not good, you should now rebuild all rdeps. After the Qt transition is over, of course. This was a

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-12-26 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Le 18/11/2018 à 20:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : clone 914002 -1 reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 affects -1 qtcreator thanks El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 10:18:03 -03 Adam Majer escribió: On 2018-11-18 12:30 p.m., Roman Lebedev wrote: If kit

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2019-01-13 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, There is no need to dump the abi as we are back where we were before. Sylvestre Le dim. 13 janv. 2019 à 09:31, Roman Lebedev a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:52 AM Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > > > Le 26/12/2018 à 21:30, Lisandro Damián Nicano

Bug#952718: qtcreator: Clang code model fail to find stddef.h if libclang-common-8-dev package is not installed

2020-03-14 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 14/03/2020 à 12:45, Alexis Murzeau a écrit : I still think there should be a Depends (not Recommends) on libclang-common-8-dev instead somewhere. (that is, directly from qtcreator or indirectly) What is wrong with this solution? Sorry if I missed a potential answer for this question. S

Bug#974784: pyside2: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-11

2020-11-14 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: pyside2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, please upgrade to -11. Thanks, Sylvestre -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'),

Bug#1000912: qttools-opensource-src: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-12 or 13

2021-11-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: qttools-opensource-src Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12). Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11 llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13. Thanks,

Bug#1000913: qtcreator: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-12 or 13

2021-11-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: qtcreator Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12). Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11 llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13. Thanks, Sylvestre

Bug#1000914: pyside2: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-12 or 13

2021-11-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: pyside2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12). Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11 llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13. Thanks, Sylvestre

Bug#1000934: clazy: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-12 or 13

2021-11-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: clazy Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12). Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11 llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13. Thanks, Sylvestre

Bug#1000925: kdevelop: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-12 or 13

2021-11-30 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: kdevelop Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12). Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11 llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13. Thanks, Sylvestre

Bug#1061205: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-01-20 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: qt6-tools Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -17. This package depends on 15. Thanks, Sylvestre

Bug#1061206: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-01-20 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Source: pyside2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -17. This package depends on 15. Thanks, Sylvestre