Bug#877807: #877807 kdeconnectd is not listen port using IPV4

2024-05-18 Thread Soren Stoutner
firewall issue instead of a KDE Connect issue. -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067873 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1067873: #1067873 kdeconnect only uses IPv6 and no IPv4

2024-05-18 Thread Soren Stoutner
Thanks for the hint about nftables. I had the same problem and this pointed me in the right direction. (In my case I just uninstalled both iptables and nftables as I don’t use either one.) -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1053409: qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS with re2 >= 20230601 (which requires abseil)

2024-04-10 Thread Soren Stoutner
Control: tags -1 patch I created a merge request at: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/ 26[1] -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org [1] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/merge_requests/ 26 signature.asc Description

Bug#1053409: qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS with re2 >= 20230601 (which requires abseil)

2024-04-10 Thread Soren Stoutner
WebEngine 5 is reaching end-of-life. -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org [1] https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine/ChromiumVersions [2] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt6/qt6-webengine/-/commit/ d4ea2d870d0db1afc9c16668bf537f8fac28f3d7 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable

2023-12-26 Thread Soren Stoutner
, that is something I expect to pick up through a combination of hard work and being willing to ask questions. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1057758: kmail: Plain text emails truncated at 60 lines if HTML section is included

2023-12-07 Thread Soren Stoutner
Package: kmail Version: 4:22.12.3-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 When composing an email in both plain text and HTML, the plain text is truncated at 60 lines when the email is sent. The HTML contains the entire message.

Bug#1057755: qt6-webengine: Support security updates in stable

2023-12-07 Thread Soren Stoutner
Source: qt6-webengine Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-12 Severity: normal Currently security patches to Qt WebEngine are not uploaded to Debian stable. The purpose of this bug report is to track efforts to change that.

Bug#1041199: qt6-webengine: Uses deprecated Python distutils

2023-07-15 Thread Soren Stoutner
Source: qt6-webengine Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-5 Severity: minor Tags: upstream There are a number of files that depend on Python's deprecated distutils. >From >https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?=qt6-webengine=html_information=on

Bug#1041198: qtwebengine-opensource-src: Uses deprecated Python distutils

2023-07-15 Thread Soren Stoutner
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src Version: 5.15.13+dfsg-1~deb12u1 Severity: minor Tags: upstream There are a number of packages that depend on Python's deprecated distutils. >From >https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?=qtwebengine-opensource-src=html_information=on

Bug#1038123: qt6-webengine: Build with system libpng beginning with Qt6 WebEngine 6.5

2023-06-15 Thread Soren Stoutner
Source: qt6-webengine Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Beginning with 6.5, Qt WebEngine will have the plumbing to build against a system libpng. https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-112466 The purpose of this bug report is to provide a reminder that once 6.5 is

Bug#1033749: libqt6webenginecore6: WebEngine currently builds with an embedded copy of libtiff

2023-03-31 Thread Soren Stoutner
Package: libqt6webenginecore6 Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream WebEngine currently builds with an embedded copy of libtiff. https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=qt6-webengine As described in the upstream Qt bug report, this appears to be a problem with the

Bug#1030916: Submit Upstream?

2023-02-09 Thread Soren Stoutner
Would this be the type of patch that is more appropriate to submit upstream? -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: qtwebengine-opensource-src_5.15.12+dfsg-3_source.changes REJECTED

2023-01-31 Thread Soren Stoutner
source-src source: If > you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. -- Soren Sto

qwebengine_convert_dict questions

2022-12-19 Thread Soren Stoutner
ges to build-depend on qwebengine_convert_dict and wouldn’t require reworking all of those packages’ build scripts every time the version of Qt in Debian changes." Thanks. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-12-13 Thread Soren Stoutner
ated aff file (and be a plain wordlist), but just > checked that even that requires an empty aff file. Good catch. For some reason I thought the documentation said to use the .aff file, but I see now that it was just working around my not using it idiomatically. -- Soren St

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-12-13 Thread Soren Stoutner
convert_dict) and that it expects .dic >> file as entry, Fixed. > >Just noticed that it is also in package and path you set, there are >two possibilities. Expect new dictionaries-common package soon. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com [1] mailto:agmar...@debian.org

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-12-09 Thread Soren Stoutner
to salsa. Currently > installdeb-myspell will fail if no conversion tool is found. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-12-03 Thread Soren Stoutner
I created an MR: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dictionaries-common/-/merge_requests/5[1] Please review and make sure I haven’t missed anything or misrepresented the consensus. On Thursday, November 17, 2022 2:25:17 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > At this point, the only question left is wh

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-11-21 Thread Soren Stoutner
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 15:13, Soren Stoutner wrote: > [snip] > > > This would also require the the Debain Qt/KDE Maintainers add a symlink > > from / usr/share/qt5/qtwebengine_dictionaries and /usr/share/qt6/ &

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-11-17 Thread Soren Stoutner
. > > mh, what documentation are you talking about?? The documentation for any packager of future Hunspell languages so that they know that they need to include compiled .bdic files, where they should be placed, and how to do it. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com [1] https://www.sto

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-11-17 Thread Soren Stoutner
if nobody else prefers to do so instead. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-11-14 Thread Soren Stoutner
e, but that file does not include an IGNORE command and doesn’t produce an error when compiled to the .bdic format. Does anyone know if ckb.aff exists in Debian? https://packages.debian.org/search? searchon=contents=ckb.aff=path=unstable=any[3] -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com [1

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-11-09 Thread Soren Stoutner
PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > The next question that needs to be answered is if we should create new > binary packages for the .bdic files or if we should ship them as part of > the existing Hunspell language binary packages. The opinions that have > been expressed so far have r

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-11-03 Thread Soren Stoutner
expressed so far have run the gamut on both sides, but my sense is they lean a little towards shipping them in the existing Hunspell packages so as to not add 80+ new packages to Debian that only contain a few files each. Is there anyone who feels strongly that they should not be shipped in the

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-25 Thread Soren Stoutner
strongly the other way? -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-14 Thread Soren Stoutner
ainst system hunspell into chromium upstream, provided bdic support > made it into upstream hunspell. I think that would be the way to go if both the upstreams would support it. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-14 Thread Soren Stoutner
UTF-8 as described above, would that mean that it is safe to assume that these are arch:all? -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com [1] https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/how-tos/editing-the-spell-checking-dictionaries signature.asc Description: This is a digitally s

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-14 Thread Soren Stoutner
obably not notice. If we go this route we need to make sure we are only editing temporary files used to generate the .bdic as those using the standard Hunspell system should not end up with an inferior experience just to accommodate a custom binary format. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutn

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-12 Thread Soren Stoutner
I submitted three upstream bugs. https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107599[1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107600[2] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107601[3] -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com [1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-107599 [2] https

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-12 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 9:38:09 AM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > > ++ processing gl_ES.aff > > gl_ES.dic_delta not found. > > Reading gl_ES.aff > > Reading gl_ES.dic > > Serializing... > > Verifying... > > Word does not match! > > > &g

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-05 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 5:07:50 AM MST Agustin Martin wrote: > El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 21:30, Soren Stoutner > One noticeable thing is that bdic generation failed for some hunspell > dicts I have installed That’s concerning. > ++ processing an_ES.aff > [100

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-09-27 Thread Soren Stoutner
nce to look further into > this. Unfortunately, there's a few other high-priority things I need to > deal with before I can take a look. That’s fine. This is a low priority, so it can wait until whenever you have time to look at it. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: T

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-09-27 Thread Soren Stoutner
Does anyone from the Chromium team have any insights into the feasibility of Chromium using a system-wide directory for .bdic files? -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-09-22 Thread Soren Stoutner
can select which dictionary they would like to be active, which GUI involves more than a single line of code. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com [1] https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-browser-pc/ [2] https://archlinux.org/todo/packaging-qtwebengine-dictionaries/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Chromium Dictionaries

2022-09-22 Thread Soren Stoutner
it would be to convince Chromium to use a system-wide directory for the .bdic storage. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Chromium Dictionaries

2022-09-22 Thread Soren Stoutner
ing that, if no Hunspell dictionary package is installed and the directory doesn’t exist, creating the symlink won’t cause any problems. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Chromium Dictionaries

2022-09-22 Thread Soren Stoutner
developers to include them in the conversation. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#760191: Fixed

2014-09-23 Thread Soren Stoutner
An update to the latest packages from testing appears to have fixed this problem for me. I have not yet exhaustively checked for remaining errors, but I an now receiving new emails. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com 623-262-6169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ

Bug#760191: Server Information

2014-09-10 Thread Soren Stoutner
of the folders. Other IMAP clients work without issue. Specifically, I am running K-9 Mail on Android, Roundcube webmail, and older version of KMail. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com 623-262-6169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#760191: Outdated Tables

2014-09-03 Thread Soren Stoutner
structure -- Soren Stoutner Small Business Tech Solutions 623-262-6169 so...@smallbusinesstech.net www.smallbusinesstech.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https

Bug#641747: Closed?

2014-06-09 Thread Soren Stoutner
I can confirm that the problem no longer exists for me. However, I am not the original submitter of the bug. On Monday, June 09, 2014 09:42:47 AM Jim Scadden wrote: On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:54:22PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: This bug is no longer an issue for me (and hasn't been so

Bug#641747: Closed?

2014-06-05 Thread Soren Stoutner
This bug is no longer an issue for me (and hasn't been so for a long time). Any reason we shouldn't close it? -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com 623-262-6169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#686483: forwarded 686483

2012-09-03 Thread Soren Stoutner
forwarded 686483 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306228 -- Soren Stoutner 623-262-6169 so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#686483: kscreensaver-xsavers does not allow access to xscreensavers advanced options

2012-09-02 Thread Soren Stoutner
4:4.8.4-2 ii xscreensaver-gl5.15-3 ii xscreensaver-gl-extra 5.15-3 Versions of packages kscreensaver-xsavers suggests: pn kscreensaver-xsavers-webcollage none -- no debconf information -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com 623-262-6169 signature.asc Description

Bug#641747: Workaround

2012-03-19 Thread Soren Stoutner
Removing the mozilla-libreoffice package fixes this problem for me. Of couse, you lose the functionality provided by mozilla-libreoffice. -- Soren Stoutner Small Business Tech Solutions 623-262-6169 so...@smallbusinesstech.net www.smallbusinesstech.net signature.asc Description

Bug#525763: Fixed with the migration of dpkg 1.15.8.4

2010-09-06 Thread Soren Stoutner
of the problem. Soren -- Soren Stoutner Small Business Tech Solutions 623-262-6169 so...@sbtechsolutions.biz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#525763: Workaround

2010-01-30 Thread Soren Stoutner
This problem occurs only when running Synaptic from KDE4. Synaptic is automatically wrapped in a perl script, for reasons that aren't clear to me. To work around this problem, log into KDE4, start Konsole, and type sudo synaptic This will launch Synaptic as root without wrapping it in a perl

Bug#525763: Workaround?

2009-09-05 Thread Soren Stoutner
This is a problem for me as well. Is there any workaround besides using a different package manager or running Synaptic in a desktop environment besides KDE? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.