Package: kwalletmanager
Version: 4:4.8.4-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I recently installed wheezy KDE on my laptop. I am used to manage my passwords
with kwalletmanager. However, if I select the kwallet manager in the K-menu,
start it via ALT-F2 or start if
I recently installed wheezy KDE on my laptop. I am used to manage my
passwords with kwalletmanager. However, if I select the kwallet manager in
the K-menu, start it via ALT-F2 or start if from command line, I don't see
any GUI.
Check in the dock area (the triangle in the taskbar, next to
Package: kwalletmanager
Version: 4:16.04.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #767905
Control: severity -1 serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I just upgraded my system from jessie (with only jessie-backports as additional
archive) to stretch and now, after reboot, my old wallets aren't
Hi
On 15-06-16 09:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> I bet you can have it have another go at it by setting alreadyMigrated to
> false
>
> martin@merkaba:~/.config> grep Migr kwalletrc
> [Migration]
> alreadyMigrated=true
paul@ruapehu ~ $ cat .config/kwalletrc
[Wallet]
First Use=false
That is
Hi all,
On 19-06-16 11:29, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> I get the impression you may need to delete the "[Migration]" configuration
> block completely.
Did that, didn't help.
> Please review the complete blog entry and the comments and check whether you
> find a solution that works for you. I
Hi Matthew,
On 20-06-16 14:11, Matthew Cope wrote:
> Do you get an error code 42 ("Unknown encryption scheme.")?
> The problem you describe sounds similar to the issue I reported in bug
> #799300
> [https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799300].
Yes, I did get error code 42 (albeit
Hmm,
On 19-06-16 19:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
> So I installed kde-runtime again and with the Migration block still
> removed, I was able to import one wallet (the password for the first
> wallet it tried to open was in second one, as it is a legacy wallet that
> I don't always rememb
ource-src (5.7.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Demote qtwebchannel5-examples dependency on npm to suggest to enable
+removal of npm in testing (Closes: #857994)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> Sat, 18 Mar 2017 12:37:30 +0100
+
qtwebchannel-openso
Source: kdelibs4support
Version: 5.42.0-2
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Since the upload of version 5.42.0-2 of kdelibs4support, the
autopkgtest¹ are timing out (~ 3 hours) while previous runs tested in
about 20 minutes (and failed). There is output to the
Source: libkf5mailcommon
Version: 4:17.12.3-1
Severity: normal
Control: user debian...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertags -1 timeout
Since the upload of version 4:17.12.3-1 of libkf5mailcommon, the
autopkgtest¹ are timing out (~ 3 hours) while previous runs tested in
about 20 minutes (and
Source: kdepim-addons
Version: 17.12.3-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Since the upload of version 17.12.3-1 of kdepim-addons, the autopkgtest¹
are timing out (~ 3 hours) while previous runs tested in about 40
minutes (and failed). There is output to the log
Source: kpackage
Version: 5.42.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
While inspecting regressions in autopkgtest results¹, I noticed that
your package kpackage fails regularly (5.45.0-1 hasn't even passed once
yet), without obvious changes. As far as I checked,
Hi Maximiliano,
On 18-06-18 14:22, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> I would suspect that this is related to a change in xorg 1.20, maybe the
> change to DRI3 by default in some video drivers (including modesetting).
>
> I haven't seen this behaviour, though (using modesetting + intel).
>
> What video
Dear KDE maintainers,
The autopkgtest of kwin¹ started failing in unstable on 2018-05-26 with
the errors copied below. Unfortunately the migration software triggered
tests in testing² did not catch the culprit as there are currently 24
KDE packages that are said to cause regression (I'll
Dear KDE maintainers, dear xorg-server maintainers
On 18-06-18 11:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The autopkgtest of kwin¹ started failing in unstable on 2018-05-26 with
> the errors copied below. Unfortunately the migration software triggered
> tests in testing² did not catch th
[Resending with a better e-mail address for xorg-server]
Dear KDE maintainers, dear xorg-server maintainers
On 18-06-18 11:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The autopkgtest of kwin¹ started failing in unstable on 2018-05-26 with
> the errors copied below. Unfortunately the migration software tri
Hi
On 18-06-18 15:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Because all but the last source package appear to come from the kde
> suite, I checked the last log⁴. The installation was clean, in the sense
> that no fall-backs occurred and only packages from xorg-server were
> installed from unstable
Subject: /usr/bin/plasmashell: recently taskbar becames unreadable after some
time of use
Package: plasma-workspace
Version: 4:5.12.5-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/plasmashell
Dear KDE maintainers,
Recently I had multiple occurances where the taskbar of my KDE session suddenly
became
Source: kirigami2
Version: 5.47.0-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
The autopkgtest run of kirigami2¹ that was triggered by the migration
software failed. Looking at the log file, I see that the build of
kirigami2 failed with the error copied at the bottom of this report.
I
Hi Maximiliano,
On 30-05-18 15:22, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> El 2018-05-30 a las 10:35 +0200, Paul Gevers escribió:
>> Last week I send you multiple (automatically generated) e-mails about
>> KDE packages that appeared to break the autopkgtest of baloo-widgets. I
>>
Hi Maximiliano,
On 31-05-18 12:07, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> ¡Hola Paul!
>
> El 2018-05-30 a las 21:29 +0200, Paul Gevers escribió:
> My experience sending mails as @debian.org to lists.debian.org is that
> mails get a spam score and so they may be considered as spam if any
>
Dear Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers,
Last week I send you multiple (automatically generated) e-mails about
KDE packages that appeared to break the autopkgtest of baloo-widgets. I
am wondering if you investigated the current breakage of the breakage.
If the regression is only in the autopkgtest
Source: baloo-kf5
Version: 5.46.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
While inspecting regressions in autopkgtest results¹, I noticed that
your package failed multiple times²³⁴⁵ without apparent changes and
passed later again. I spotted at least to two errors
Source: plasma-framework
Version: 5.46.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
While inspecting regressions in autopkgtest results¹, I noticed that
your package failed multiple times²³ without apparent changes and passed
later again. I think all cases had the
Dear systemd maintainers, all,
With the upload of version 239-1 of systemd the autopkgtests of the
policykit-1, kwin and python-dbusmock started to fail¹.
It appear that policykit-1 fails to install since the 239-1 version of
systemd with (in the unstable test run, in the testing test run as
Hi Michael,
On 23-06-18 13:44, Michael Biebl wrote:
> you are quick!
YW.
> Am 23.06.2018 um 13:30 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> I already tracked down the reason for the policykit-1 failure
Great, you're quick. ;)
> and it is
> indeed a regression/behaviour change in systemd. A
Source: kate4
Version: 4:4.14.3-4
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Dear maintainer,
Your package has an autopkgtest. Great. However, I noticed it sometimes
is on the list of slow tests (it takes more than an hour on the
ci.debian.net infrastructure, which is in principle fine
Dear KDE maintainers,
[tl;dr: I don't think xorg-server and/or mesa caused the regression in
kwin]
On 18-06-18 15:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 18-06-18 15:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Because all but the last source package appear to come from the kde
>> suite, I check
Source: ktexteditor
Version: 5.47.0-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Dear maintainers,
After the recent qt transitions and the fixing of all the fall-out by
uploading a new version of abi-compliance-checker, the autopkgtest of
ktexteditor remains failing in unstable and
Dear Lisandro,
On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to, if
> my mind does not fails, gcc 8.
It may have slipped in, because the autopkgtests were so much broken for
a while that I didn't check
Dear all,
On 06-08-18 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
> ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is benign?
I believe there is a regression, at least in the autopkgtest. I filed
bug 905559 for that already.
Paul
Dear all,
To be sure, I don't want to block/delay anything here, I just want
autopkgtests to be taken seriously. If you as the maintainer of
ktexteditor say please ignore my test for migration, who am I to say
you're wrong. However, you have also added that test for a reason.
On 06-08-18 15:33,
Source: qtbase-opensource-src, kdeconnect
Version: qtbase-opensource-src/5.11.1+dfsg-7
Version: kdeconnect/1.3.1-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, open...@packages.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Control: block 907015 by -1
Dear maintainers,
Source: qtbase-opensource-src, purpose
Version: qtbase-opensource-src/5.11.1+dfsg-7
Version: purpose/5.47.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, open...@packages.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Control: block 907015 by -1
Dear maintainers,
With a
Source: purpose
Version: 5.49.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With the upload of 5.49.0-1 the autpkgtest of your package started to
fail in unstable and testing. I copied the output below.
Currently this
Package: plasma-nm
Version: 4:5.13.1-1
On 2018-07-15 at 15:03:20 UTC+02 I upgraded my buster system. Since then
I am having issues with NetworkManager not being able to connect to WiFi
because the agent isn't available after resuming from suspend. I think
(but have no way to confirm) that it also
Control: reassign -1 src:kwayland 4:5.47.0-1
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 20:13:14 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: plasma-framework
This was obviously wrong. Reassigning to the right package.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: baloo-widgets
Version: 4:18.08.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of baloo-widgets the autopkgtest of baloo-widgets
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary
Hi all,
On 09/06/18 21:13, Paul Gevers wrote:
> So it seems they are requested by something, and because the are not
> available in testing, apt-get is not limited by our pinning to take them
> from unstable. I believe it must be a "Provides" of some sort. What I
> want to
Dear glibc, abi-compliance-checker and Qt/KDE maintainers,
With recent upload of glibc and abi-compliance-checker the autopkgtest
of libkf5calendarsupport, kf5-kdepim-apps-libs and akonadi-calendar
started to fail when run in testing with either glibc or
abi-compliance-checker from unstable.
Hi
On 06-09-18 11:53, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 06 sept. 2018 11:44:45 +0200, a ecrit:
>> Paul Gevers, le jeu. 06 sept. 2018 11:22:46 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> On 06-09-18 11:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>>> It'd be useful for the abi-compliance-c
Hi Samuel, all,
On 06-09-18 11:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It'd be useful for the abi-compliance-checker test to actually output
> error messages,
>
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/k/kf5-kdepim-apps-libs/944759/log.gz
>
> it not very talkative :)
I agree, but I found
Source: libkf5mailimporter
Version: 4:17.12.3-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of glibc the autopkgtest of libkf5mailimporter
started to fail when run in testing. The test was
Hi
On 06-09-18 16:39, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> Does this mean that libc++-8-dev is breaking the ABI of the Qt/KDE
>>> packages? Luckily libc++-8-dev will not migrate to testing due to
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/714686 Does it need a "Breaks" then?
>>
>> Actually due to a bug in the migration
Source: plasma-framework
Version: 4:5.47.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
While inspecting regressions in autopkgtest results¹, I noticed that
your package failed multiple times² without apparent changes and passed
later again. I think all cases had the
Source: libkf5pimcommon
Version: 4:17.12.3-1
Severity: normal
User: ci-t...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: regression
With the upload of version 17.12.3-1 of libkf5pimcommon, the
autopkgtest¹ started to fail.
Among others:
objdump: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc++.so: File format not recognized
Source: akonadi-search
Version: 4:17.12.3-1
Severity: normal
User: ci-t...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: regression
With the upload of version 17.12.3-1 of akonadi-search, the
autopkgtest¹ started to fail with the following error:
autopkgtest [04:01:09]: test acc: [---
Source: kdav
Version: 17.12.3-1
Severity: normal
User: ci-t...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: regression
With the upload of version 17.12.3-1 of kdav, the
autopkgtest¹ started to fail with the following error:
Running tests...
/usr/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process -j1
Test project
Source: libkf5libkdepim
Version: 4:17.12.3-1
Severity: normal
User: ci-t...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: regression
With the upload of version 17.12.3-1 of libkf5libkdepim, the
autopkgtest¹ started to fail with the following error:
autopkgtest [15:29:56]: test acc: [---
Source: kleopatra
Version: 4:17.12.3-1
Severity: normal
User: ci-t...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: regression
With the upload of version 17.12.3-1 of kleopatra, the
autopkgtest¹ started to fail with the following error:
Running tests...
/usr/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process -j2
Test project
Hi systemd and kwin maintainers,
On 23-06-18 14:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> The breakage in kwin looks unrelated to me (maybe caused by the libinput
>> update, dunno).
>
> To avoid any doubt, I have triggered a reference run, with only testing
> (results in a hour or so). Bu
Source: krunner
Version: 5.51.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of packages in the KDE stack the autopkgtest of
krunner fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with those binary
packages
Source: korganizer
Version: 4:18.08.1-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of korganizer the autopkgtest of korganizer fails
in unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Version: 5.11.2+dfsg-6
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of qtbase-opensource-src the autopkgtest of quite a
few packages fail in testing when their
Hi Lisandro,
Thanks for the reply.
On 18-11-18 21:47, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> None of the qtbase changes should be triggering this. *But* all the packages
> are being built with qttools5-dev-tools 5.11.2-4 instead of 5.11.2-5, and
> that
> might be the issue, as the
Hi Maximiliano, others
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:24:15 -0300 Maximiliano Curia
wrote:
> About the kde frameworks uploads, they are handled in a bundle, and breaks
> and
> dependencies are added so they migrate to testing as needed, the same breaks
> and dependencies can cause temporary
Dear all,
On 09-09-18 22:04, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 09/06/18 21:13, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> So it seems they are requested by something, and because the are not
>> available in testing, apt-get is not limited by our pinning to take them
>> from unstable. I believe it must be
Hi Scott,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:03:33 + Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> I think rebuilding the rdepends is a reasonable next step. I'll try
> that and see if anything is affected.
Did you get around to do this?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi khelpcenter maintainers,
On Sat, 01 Jun 2019 21:30:41 +0200 pnd23 wrote:
> KDE packages install their documentation files in /usr/share/doc/HTML on
> buster
> (in debian 8 this was: /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML). The "dhelp" package erases
> this folder when it rebuilds its index. The KHelpcenter
Source: clazy
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear maintainer,
During a binNMU of clazy during the llvm-defaults transition, you package FTBFS
on armel. Can you please check and fix the situation?
The last part of the log message as
Source: pyside2
Version: 5.13.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear maintainers,
In commit 5e39f9e [1] you added a new build dependency on
libqt5datavisualization5-dev, however, that package is not available on mipsel
and
Source: clazy
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of gcc-10 to unstable, the autopkgtest of clazy
failed on arm64 in testing when that autopkgtest
Hi Pino,
Thanks for the well written response.
On 25-02-2020 20:41, Pino Toscano wrote:
> The test is not flaky.
I can see why you say that now, but from my PoV (the release team) it is.
>> With a recent upload of gcc-10 to unstable, the autopkgtest of clazy
>> failed on arm64 in testing when
Source: qtwebsockets-opensource-src
Version: 5.12.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs
Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye
Dear maintainer,
We did a rebuild of all packages linking against libqt5quick5, see bug
#948199. However, you package FTBFS on s390x due to a test timeout. Can
you please
Hi Timo,
On 24-01-2020 18:52, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 23.1.2020 23.08, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> On 23-01-2020 22:01, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>> Look at the error above, the file shipped by qtbase5-dev requires
>>> libEGL.so which the
Source: mesa, kcrash, konsole, libkscreen
Control: found -1 mesa/19.3.2-1
Control: found -1 kcrash/5.62.0-1
Control: found -1 konsole/4:19.08.1-2
Control: found -1 libkscreen/4:5.14.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi Timo,
On 23-01-2020 19:32, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> The relevant part of the build log was:
>
> CMake Error at
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt5Gui/Qt5GuiConfig.cmake:27 (message):
> The imported target "Qt5::Gui" references the file
>
> "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libEGL.so"
>
>
Hi Timo,
On 23-01-2020 22:01, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Look at the error above, the file shipped by qtbase5-dev requires
> libEGL.so which the libegl-dev dependency provides. It used to be in
> libglvnd-dev but moved to a new package when the EGL headers were added
> upstream.
So, libglvnd-dev
Source: plasma-mediacenter
Version: 5.7.5-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debhel...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:debhelper
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of debhelper
Source: libkeduvocdocument
Version: 4:17.08.3-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. I copied some
of the output at the bottom of this
Source: baloo-kf5
Version: 5.70.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of baloo-kf5 the autopkgtest of baloo-kf5 fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary
Hi all,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 18:53:25 -0400 Nicholas D Steeves
wrote:
> Recently baloo has been crashing whenever I log in. Today I decided it
> was a persistent and serious enough problem that a serious bug was
> warranted. I've attached the backtrace produced by drkonqi. Here is
> some
Hi all,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:04:40 +0500 Alex Volkov
wrote:
> I'm using elogind 239.3+20190131-1+debian1 and the agent fails to start
> at the kde launch with the following diagnostics:
Any progress on this? The bullseye freeze is approaching.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP
Control: notfound -1 4:20.08.0-1
Hi Charles,
On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:57:16 + (UTC) Charles Samuels
wrote:
> KAlgebra shows nothing in its output screen. This only applies
> to the algebraic displays, the graphs and dictionary tabs seem
> to work fine.
>
> Reproduce: Enter any equation into
Control: tags -1 buster
Hi Charles,
On 28-12-2020 20:51, Charles Samuels wrote:
> On Monday, December 28, 2020 11:30:18 AM PST Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I tried to reproduce this in current testing and for me it works. Is
>> this issue still a problem for you?
>
> Yes it is s
Source: kservice
Version: 5.70.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
kservice is a key package, which is why we noticed an autopkgtest
failures as part of our checks on the status of
Control: reassign -1 plasma-workspace
@ Qt/KDE maintainers: slightly random chosen reassignment
Hi Malvin,
Thanks for your report. Unfortunately it fell through the cracks for
some time. I have reassigned you bug report to one of the packages you
reported you reinstalled, I hope the Qt/KDE
Control: reassign 996767 kde-standard
Hi Hype,
Thanks for your report about the issues you encounter.
On 18-10-2021 13:16, Hype_the_Time wrote:
> Language maybe used my output of the shell: German
> This bug report is a day old but a new apt upgrade didnt fixed it
Interesting you choose to
Source: kget
Version: 4:20.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4:21.08.0-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days
Hi Diederik,
On 11-11-2021 12:31, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> And it's not enabled with me too and I also have no recollection of disabling
> it. But the attached screenshot gives a (pretty good) hint as to why it got
> disabled: (apparent) previous KWin crashes.
Nice screenshot. For the record,
Package: kwin-x11
Version: 4:5.23.2-1
Severity: important
Dear maintainers,
First off, thanks for maintaining KDE in Debian, I enjoy using it.
Since a recent upgrade (after the issues we had with only half (or
less) of the stack migrating to testing) I'm experiencing issues with
drawing of
Hi Norbert,
On 11-11-2021 09:58, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Can you check whether
> Start compositor on startup
> is selected in the Plasma settings?
It was disabled. Immediately after enabling it, the issues seem to be gone.
I don't believe I ever changed the setting, so it got into this
Source: cantor
Version: 4:21.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
Hi,
As part of the pseudo libluajit transition [1] I scheduled a rebuild
of cantor. It failed to build everywhere [2]. As can be seen on the
reproducible build project page, the build already fails in
Hi all,
Today I stumbled upon some packages that failed to migrate to testing
because they switched their build dependency to qt6-declarative. It
seems to me that this package is relatively new and a replacement for
something we already had for a while. Apparently that built on s390x, so
Source: qtfeedback-opensource-src
Version: 5.0~git20180903.a14bd0b-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.0~git20180903.a14bd0b-4
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Dear Pino,
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:04:19 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This bug has been marked pending for 2.5 months now. Can you please upload?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 08:47:45 -0400 Ralf Jung wrote:
Also see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457847.
That bug was determined to be caused by
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/7674. I *think* (but
haven't confirmed yet as that doesn't seem trivial to do) that that
Package: plasma-workspace
Version: 4:5.27.0-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/plasmashell
Dear maintainers,
Thank you for maintaining KDE in Debian, it must be a hell of a job. I
want to share the following annoyance which is probably due to a crash
and auto restart (so an annoyance, but
Hi,
On 28-05-2023 10:58, Patrick Franz wrote:
unblock qt6-base/6.4.2+dfsg-10
Unblocked, thanks.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Soren,
On 14-12-2023 04:49, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Currently there is no real security support for Qt WebEngine in stable, which
is an oversight that might surprise many Debian users.
It's explicitly documented in the release notes:
Hi Soren,
On 14-12-2023 08:45, Soren Stoutner wrote:
How do you recommend we change that?
I think you're having the right discussion. I'm not a Stable Release
Manager so I don't feel authoritative about stable. However, in my
*personal* opinion and reflected in a proposal [1] I'm driving
Source: k3b
Version: 22.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 23.08.2-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
92 matches
Mail list logo
