On 2018-09-11 12:57:17 [+0300], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I'm on buster and with the latest updates from yesterday came
> > qtbase-opensource-src 5.11.1+dfsg-7
> > and SSL started to fail in Qt5 programs. This was reported in bug 907774 ~
> > 2 weeks ago.
> >
> > Basically libssl 1.1.1 (in whatever
On 2018-09-11 16:11:02 [+0300], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Dmitry already implemented my short-term workaround:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/986618/accepted-qtbase-opensource-src-5111dfsg-8-source-into-unstable/
>
> When this has been built on all release architectures openssl can bump
> the versi
On 2018-09-11 22:43:26 [+0300], Antti Järvinen wrote:
> buster where this app was still working on Sunday 9th september. On
> 10th apt upgraded libqt5network5:amd64 from 5.11.1+dfsg-6 to 5.11.1+dfsg-7
does 5.11.1+dfsg-8 work for you?
…
> combination that should work? The nodes in the network genera
On 2018-08-25 10:33:54 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:22:09AM +, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> > Source: kopete
> > Source-Version: 4:18.04.1-1
> >
> > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> > kopete, which is due to be installed in the Debia
On 2018-08-27 22:52:06 [+0200], Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Source: qtbase-opensource-src, kimap
> Version: kimap/18.07.90-1
> Control: block 907015 by -1
>
> When I built my KDE PIM packages locally I built against openssl 1.1.0h-4 and
> I had no issues running the KIMAP tests.
> With openssl 1.1.1~~p
On 2018-10-21 12:31:45 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:29:28PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2018-08-25 10:33:54 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:22:09AM +, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> > > > Source:
On December 1, 2018 2:02:42 PM UTC, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
wrote:
>So; to get the ball rolling on this RC bug:
>
>* I've prepared a Debian patch with it
If you switch to openssl-dev with this upload, please make it depend on
libssl1.1 (which does not happen because it does not depend on any sym
On 2018-12-03 12:30:53 [+0100], Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > If you switch to openssl-dev with this upload, please make it depend on
> > libssl1.1 (which does not happen because it does not depend on any symbols)
> > and the you could also close
> >
> > #913959 [S| | ] [src:kde4libs] kde4libs
Package: khtml
Version: 5.28.0-1
Severity: serious
khtml B-D on libssl-dev and has been built against it in the archive. I
am not entirely sure that this works. I doubt because QT itself uses
libssl1.0.2 and passing around SSL, SSL_CTX, BIO or any other struct is
a no no. Additionally some of the
On 2017-02-25 12:29:31 [-0300], Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> I think the issue here is if it will work or not at runtime.
that is what I assume, correct.
> Sebastian: have you seen it crash due to this?
No. I assume that it might use QT's internal networking which is 1.0 and if
On 2017-02-26 01:03:23 [+0100], John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> But the question is whether SSL support is actually relevant in khtml at all.
If it is not exported or mixed with QT's SSL then it is not relevant.
> As you can see from the list of reverse dependencies, there's actually not
> muc
On 2017-02-26 20:31:23 [+0100], Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data domenica 26 febbraio 2017 20:15:25 CET, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha
> scritto:
> > On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does
On 2017-03-01 00:50:59 [+0100], John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
Hi,
> The problem is that if the package was to be rebuilt now, it would be
> rebuilt with OpenSSL 1.1 and not OpenSSL 1.0 which is the original
> motivation for this bug report by Sebastian!
it already has been built with 1.1
Package: qtbase-opensource-src
Version: 5.7.1~20161021+dfsg-5
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle.
Sebastian
Package: qtwebsockets-opensource-src
Version: 5.7.1~20161021-4
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle.
Sebastian
Package: khtml
Version: 5.28.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans
Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle. It was switched to
libssl1.0-dev in order to follow QT (the bug report was #856004).
Sebastian
On 2017-08-08 12:44:09 [+0200], Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> Package: libssl1.1
> Version: 1.1.0f-4
> Severity: important
>
> After upgrading a server to libssl1.1 1.1.0f-4 kmail on debian/stable could
> not connect to dovecot on debian/unstable any more (kmail on debian/unstable
> can't connect, ei
On 2017-08-26 16:44:34 [-0300], Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Hi! src:qt4-x11 is not listed in the transition but it's definitely using
> libssl (although trough dllopen).
It is. The other qt-related bugs are:
#828522 [i| |♔] [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
#859671
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
On 2016-08-30 08:42:07 [-0300], Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Hi! I'm CCing the Qt5 bug too because this concerns both versions.
Could someone please comment if whatever happens in
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-52905
is related to what happens here?
Sebastian
On 2016-08-30 12:40:12 [+0200], Gert Wollny wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 30.08.2016, 08:51 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:53:20PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the review.
> > Can I ask what the current state of this is?
>
> IIRC the last patch appli
On 2016-10-29 23:26:49 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:32:34PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > One thing that confuses me: Why has none
> > of the libraries a dependency on libssl?
>
> From what I understand they use dlopen() and
29 matches
Mail list logo
