Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]

2004-05-23 Thread Martin Schulze
Moin! Martin-Éric Racine wrote: Le dim, 23/05/2004 à 01:36 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit : Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant consequences rhythmbox is not related to gnome2.6 at all, That's incorrect. Configuration of the audio sink used by

Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]

2004-05-23 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
[let's Reply-To the gnome-gtk list, as this is clearly starting to exceeed debian-release issues, as Sebastian pointed out] On Sun, 23 May 2004, Martin Schulze wrote: Martin-Éric Racine wrote: Le dim, 23/05/2004 à 01:36 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit : Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered

Bug#250531: please remove gcc-3.2 from unstable

2004-05-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: ftp.debian.org There are currently three remaining bugs against packages, build-depending on gcc-3.2: - #236447 (nhc98): Bug report is still open, but the dependency on gcc-3.2 has been dropped. - #243048 (xen): Same thing. - #236456 (make-cross): gcc-3.2 did call the cc1 binary

gif-producing code and sarge?

2004-05-23 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, as far as I understood, we probably need for the release of sarge at least six more weeks, i.e. not before 4th July. Some packages are put into non-free/contrib because they produce (direct or indirect) gif-images, and there is a gif patent. According to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html

aggressive removal suggestions

2004-05-23 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, as just promised on IRC, here are some aggressive removal suggestions. They probably need some re-viewing. # kernels that have already a newer version in testing: # ignore d-i kernel-image-2.4.25-s390/2.4.25-2 remove kernel-image-2.4.21-s390/2.4.21-2 # ignore version

Re: gif-producing code and sarge?

2004-05-23 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 08:57:39PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: So, I would like to move these packages / programs into main (more specifically, ppmtogif from netpbm-nonfree into netpbm-free, and file wishlist requests on the appropriate dependend packages). However, as the last expiry falls

Re: gif-producing code and sarge?

2004-05-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:15:12AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: Considering that it doesn't look like the freeze is really going to take place any time soon, If the SC vote goes in such a way as to indicate that the project is happy to release sarge in roughly its current state, I think we