Everytime I try to burn an ISO image it gives me an error. I do exactly as the instruction say to do for burning an ISO image with Nero, and it does not work. None of the things I try work on any program. Could it be the disc I'm using? I'm using a CD-R All Purpose CD that can hold up to 700 MB.
Because of Bugs #264770 and #264773, it is doubtful that the code is
mature enough for production use, and even if it's fixed by upstream
today, it will not be tested enough by the time sarge is released.
Therefore, I request that this package is removed from sarge
(it should be ok that it remains
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:47:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Because of Bugs #264770 and #264773, it is doubtful that the code is
mature enough for production use, and even if it's fixed by upstream
today, it will not be tested enough by the time sarge is released.
Therefore, I request that
shadowhost self-diagnostic rmmer n2 sdcsvax shappir
If you need X)[EMAIL PROTECTED], Parac-odin, SuperVia;gra or Me`ridia we have
it.
http://i.net.thepillswebsite.com?f4=T11k26
Don't be impudent, Eureka, admonished Dorothy
It is you who are impudent, said Eureka, for
[ CC'ing -openoffice and -release ]
Hi,
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
Changes:
curl (7.12.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release:
- workaround for ASN1_STRING_to_UTF8 failing if input is already
UTF-8 encoded (closes: #264711).
* Bumped up shlibs version for
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:55:59PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
UARGH. That time is suboptimal. I am trying to get an OOo with *two* RC
bug fixes (one unreported, removal of unnedded builddep on libtiff3g-dev)
and the removal of the unneeded -crashrep package into sarge. As I fixed
your
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:56:45 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Reminder: the directory
dists/sarge/main/upgrade-i386
still has not been created, let alone populated.
Oh, yuck. This is the first I've heard of this problem.
I would expect this to be a hard requirement before sarge can be
RC bug 253098 reported against jadetex is 64 days old. I believe that
this bug is making some packages (packages that build-depend upon
docbook-utils) FTBFS. This would include at least two packages
involved in the tiff transition. I would like to request an immediate
NMU because of the impact
Generic PhÅrmcy,upto 80% off!
XÀnax, Välium, Hydrocodone, and Norco..
3 of the best paIn kIllers out
and other popular product.
http://message.hgztyas.com/py/
no m_ore email
http://postmark.poauizbba.com/f.html
indescribable psych lynn devisee olivetti india apparent orchid gastronome
sleepy
Hello,
should removal requests from ftp.debian.org repeated here to be sure
they will be removed from sarge or will the list on ftp.debian.org
worked on in the near future/before the freeze?
thx.
--
Noèl Köthe noel debian.org
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
should removal requests from ftp.debian.org repeated here to be sure
they will be removed from sarge or will the list on ftp.debian.org
worked on in the near future/before the freeze?
Please make sure that the ftp.debian.org bugs are
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
should removal requests from ftp.debian.org repeated here to be sure
they will be removed from sarge or will the list on ftp.debian.org
worked on in the near future/before the freeze?
As noted on IRC, if it's important that a package
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:37:00AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:56:45 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Reminder: the directory
dists/sarge/main/upgrade-i386
still has not been created, let alone populated.
Oh, yuck. This is the first I've heard of this problem.
I
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:57:56PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
RC bug 253098 reported against jadetex is 64 days old. I believe that
this bug is making some packages (packages that build-depend upon
docbook-utils) FTBFS. This would include at least two packages
involved in the tiff
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:57:56PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
RC bug 253098 reported against jadetex is 64 days old. I believe that
this bug is making some packages (packages that build-depend upon
docbook-utils) FTBFS. This would include at least two packages
involved in
Hi release-team,
question about a removal from testing:
openmosix
It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
its rdepends:
openmosixview
libmos (provided by openmosix)
kernel-patch-openmosix (provided by openmosix)
openmosix-dev (provided by openmosix)
I think this is a question suitable for debian-release this time. ;-)
Now that the jadetex NMU has been done, I'd like to close tetex bug
264043. Someone cloned 253098 (the jadetex bug) and assigned it to
tetex, probably because jadetex's installation script failure message
indicated that it
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
question about a removal from testing:
openmosix
It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
Actually, I was working on that already (well, that issue was fixed, I
was trying to fix the *other* bugs against it
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
question about a removal from testing:
openmosix
It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
Actually, I was working on that already (well, that issue was fixed, I
was trying to fix
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:53:50PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I think this is a question suitable for debian-release this time. ;-)
Now that the jadetex NMU has been done, I'd like to close tetex bug
264043. Someone cloned 253098 (the jadetex bug) and assigned it to
tetex, probably
Tag it 'fixed'. You indicate the bug is fixed, to your knowledge, and
all related scripts treat it like that. But the bug will remain in the
BTS until the maintainer verified it and really closes the bug.
Makes perfect sense -- then the two cloned bugs will be in the same
state since
Executive summary: Packages that had DSAs in 2003 and are still not
fixed yet in sarge include tomcat4 and gtksee. Grep for ! for details.
I was unable to reach a conclusion for three packages, ssh-krb5, gnotocan,
and mysql. Grep for HELP.
Packages that need to be updated in sarge, or removed,
Hi guys (sigh, I had written bugs instead of guys...),
In the last few days I've NMU'ed the following packages that should be
nursed into testing so the RC bug fixes go in. Not all are tiff related.
devil
gimageview
goats
sndconfig
jadetex
gnobog
(working on grass, ready tomorrow)
Thanks.
Jordi
23 matches
Mail list logo
