On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Chris Cheney wrote:
I did not upload KDE 3.3 to try to have a nice shiny new release in
sarge, it just seemed to lesser of the evils and considering the current
ah, and breaking other packages and the release plan with your
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:21:06PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Currently, sarge has adduser 0.57, sid has adduser 0.59
0.59 has been uploaded on July 30, before the freeze, and both 0.58
and 0.59 have been translation updates
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:11:52AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
hi, vim and vimhelp-fr need to be hinted to enter testing together
(when vimhelp-fr is old enough):
easy vim/1:6.3-013+2 vimhelp-fr/6.3.011-1
as for the vimacs-becomes-uninstallable issue (see RC bug #265435),
and
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:41:40AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Diff approved; I've marked adduser 2.59 to be forced into sarge.
3.59. Even I didn't get my own version numbers right.
I got it right in the hints file but not in the
Please let lzo 1.08-1.1 through into sarge.
It fixes the location of the .la file (in the -dev package not the runtime
package), fixes potential build problems when /bin/sh isn't bash and updates
config.{guess,sub}. The diff with the 1.08-1 currently in sarge is part of
merge 177134 258401
thanks
Hi,
I'm the maintainer for distributed-net.
Upstream provides binary builds for various architectures. I cannot
build for other architectures (combination of license and crippled source).
The latest version in unstable is 2.9008.490-2. Upstream no longer
Hello,
I have talked to Bill Yerazunis which is upstream maintainer of crm114
about what version he would like to have in sarge. He wants to have new
version of crm114 in sarge since it includes bugfixes for some long
standing bugs. However he wants to postpone decision till Wednesday 15.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have talked to Bill Yerazunis which is upstream maintainer of crm114
about what version he would like to have in sarge. He wants to have new
version of crm114 in sarge since it includes bugfixes for some long
standing bugs.
Notification of change of address effective immediately
FROM Mary Doyle
30 Jeffreys Neck Road
Ipswich, MA 01938-1308
TO:
MARY DOYLE
33C CAROLINE AVENUE
IPSWICH, MA 01938-1759
THANK YOU
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 10:47:17AM +, Stephen Stafford wrote:
I'm the maintainer for distributed-net.
Upstream provides binary builds for various architectures. I cannot
build for other architectures (combination of license and crippled source).
The latest version in unstable is
Steve Langasek wrote:
You want to file a bug against ftp.debian.org.
Yes, there are in fact two bugs filed against ftp.d.o asking for removal.
I know the ftpmasters are busy, but a couple of weeks from release, I'm
getting understandably concerned :)
The bugs in question are #177134 and
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have talked to Bill Yerazunis which is upstream maintainer of crm114
about what version he would like to have in sarge. He wants to have new
version of crm114 in sarge since it includes bugfixes for some long
standing bugs.
Steve Langasek píše v Po %{Day}. 08. 2004 v 12:16 -0700:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have talked to Bill Yerazunis which is upstream maintainer of crm114
about what version he would like to have in sarge. He wants to have new
version of crm114 in sarge
Hello,
KDE 3.3 is out, which is fine, but is Qt 3.3 planned for Sarge? It's been
in Sid for a while, so a lot has been built against it. However, it is not
100% perfectly backwards compatible with Qt 3.2. For instance, gwenview (a
KDE image viewer I maintain) needs to be rebuilt against Qt 3.3 to
* Ondrej Sury [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-16 21:53]:
testing is 28 August, and while there may be some slippage yet, it's not
likely to slip by more than half a month.
Err, it was typo on my side, the date was Wednesday 5 PM GMT, I don't
know why I wrote 15th.
If you upload with urgency
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:06:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's not realistic to expect the ftpmasters to prioritize package name
changes above other tasks that are critical for the release.
Except that the GNUstep packages have been critized over and over again
for polluting the package
16 matches
Mail list logo
