Re: python2.3 and python-defaults for testing

2004-12-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:20:02AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: please approve python2.3 and python-defaults from unstable for migration to testing. python2.3 does move the distutils package from python2.3-dev to python2.3, which is already done for testing in the other python packages. The

uninstallation bugs are RC

2004-12-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
severity 287355 serious thanks It was always clear for me that uninstallation bugs definitely have to be RC. Installation bugs are RC, and uninstallation bugs are even worse since it may take longer util they are discovered. cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked

Pushing renattach from unstable to testing

2004-12-31 Thread Mats Rynge
Hi Release Team, I have a package which I think fits the following description: - If your package is frozen, but the version in unstable contains no changes unsuitable for testing, upload to unstable only and contact debian-release@lists.debian.org if changes need to be pushed through

Re: Pushing renattach from unstable to testing

2004-12-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:02:57PM -0800, Mats Rynge wrote: I have a package which I think fits the following description: - If your package is frozen, but the version in unstable contains no changes unsuitable for testing, upload to unstable only and contact

Re: uninstallation bugs are RC

2004-12-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: severity 287355 serious thanks It was always clear for me that uninstallation bugs definitely have to be RC. Installation bugs are RC, and uninstallation bugs are even worse since it may take longer util they are discovered.

Please review groff 1.18.1.1-5 for sarge

2004-12-31 Thread Colin Watson
Changelog since groff 1.18.1.1-3 in sarge: groff (1.18.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=high * Upstream fix for temporary file handling vulnerability in pic2graph (closes: #286371). * Upstream fix for temporary file handling vulnerability in eqn2graph (closes: #286372). -- Colin Watson

Re: unfixed security holes in testing

2004-12-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 03:59:48AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Joey Hess wrote: vim 1:6.3-046+0sarge1 needed, have 1:6.3-013+2 for CAN-2004-1138 This one's in t-p-u, there was a problem with the sparc buildd, so I built the sparc package on another machine and just uploaded it.

Re: Please allow base-files_3.1.2 in testing

2004-12-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:20:35PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: base-files (3.1.2) unstable; urgency=low * Changed example line in default /root/.bashrc from eval `dircolors` to eval `dircolors` as the old form may be dangerous (Closes: #285836). Thanks a lot to Paul Eggert for the

Re: unfixed security holes in testing

2004-12-31 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Colin Watson wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 03:59:48AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Joey Hess wrote: vim 1:6.3-046+0sarge1 needed, have 1:6.3-013+2 for CAN-2004-1138 This one's in t-p-u, there was a problem with the sparc buildd, so I built the sparc package on another machine