Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * charva (- to 1.0.1-3) + Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers + Section: contrib/libs + 342 days old (needed 10 days) +

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * charva (- to 1.0.1-3) + Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers + Section: contrib/libs + 342 days old

freeswan and opensc migration to testing

hi dear Release Managers, looking at freeswan and opensc i noted they probably need a hint to enter sarge together. thank you all for your continuous involvement in the debian project :) happy new year! cheers domenico -[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[

Re: freeswan and opensc migration to testing

Hi Domenico, On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:18:54AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: looking at freeswan and opensc i noted they probably need a hint to enter sarge together. Well spotted. Hint added. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:30:35 -0800, mbc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working on a new version of this package now. It depends on java2-runtime because it uses swing. Is there a different virtual dependency that I can use to resolve the problem and get it into testing? If you have never seen it,

Re: freeswan and opensc migration to testing

* Domenico Andreoli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050105 11:05]: looking at freeswan and opensc i noted they probably need a hint to enter sarge together. Hint added. Thanks. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:20:37 -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * charva (- to 1.0.1-3) + Maintainer: Debian Java

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: About all the other java packages, I'd like to move a lot of them in main but even if kaffe (and sablevm) made good steps, they are not stable (kaffe)/complete (both) enough to move them to main at the moment. I don't think

testing security status report

Here I am again with the weekly report on packages that have security fixes in sid that arn't in sarge yet. I've made a web page that has essentially the same info, if you ignore the open bugs also listed there. Not sure if it will make sense for me to keep up the reports or not given this page.

Please Consider atari-bootstrap for sarge

Please consider approving atari-bootstrap for sarge. atari-bootstrap_3.3-5 has been in the archive 19 days and closes all outstanding bugs on the package. It is currently used on the m68k daily d-i builds and I've had no reports of problems. The most important change is that it supports several

GNUstep packages

Hi, Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built on arm) But all the 53 others GNUstep packages are valid candidates and cannot enter in

Re: GNUstep packages

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built on arm) gnustep-antlr/arm is in

Re: GNUstep packages

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: Hi, Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built on arm) There is 1 other

Re: GNUstep packages

On 2005-01-05 19:00:24 +0100 Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: Hi, Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid

Re: GNUstep packages

Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built on arm)