Op za, 05-03-2005 te 22:56 -0800, schreef Matt Zimmerman:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:34:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Security and release teams, may I have your advice about this suggestion?
As you may know, I currently act as maintainer for the shadow package,
but I'm also
Op zo, 06-03-2005 te 22:52 +1100, schreef Hamish Moffatt:
Goswin wrote:
Need-build is a good sign. http://buildd.net/ shows you are on place
37 out of 120. I suggest just waiting unless the buildd has stoped
altogether.
What is the ordering criteria on the buildds?
See
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:03:11PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op za, 05-03-2005 te 22:56 -0800, schreef Matt Zimmerman:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:34:58PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Security and release teams, may I have your advice about this suggestion?
As you may know, I
Hi,
gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option
--disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit. This
causes it to have a different C++ ABI.
This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon.
I've made a list of source packages that might have been build
with the
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option
--disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit. This
causes it to have a different C++ ABI.
This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon.
I've
Hi Agustin,
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:47:59PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 06:00:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:24:14AM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
A fix for that is in unstable, for two weeks now, and I think this should
go
6 matches
Mail list logo