Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:56:22 -0700
Source: python-libgmail
Binary: python-libgmail
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.8+cvs20050208-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Release Managers,
I've just received a Czech translation for ntlmaps. I've uploaded it as
version 0.9.9-2 to uk, since ftp-master wasn't accepting connections.
Could this version be included with sarge? It's architecture-all so no
further builds are required. The extra translation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.05.2005, at 11:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
We mentioned in the freeze announcement[1] that we needed
volunteers to
help with processing upgrade reports -- taking them apart, identifying
the bugs that appear, and assigning them to the packages
Hi
Can you hint muddleftpd, 1.3.13.1-4 in sarge?
(Well, after its ready, Im waiting for the m68k build, all others worked).
It is running in this version on my own box(i386) and on
amd64.debian.net(amd64), to
test it under some load.
Changelog:
muddleftpd (1.3.13.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:24:14AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would be doubly wary of letting a new upstream version of a package into
testing as an NMU. If James agrees that 1.4.1 is the way to go for sarge,
I've uploaded 1.4.1-1 to unstable. On
Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:32 Steve Langasek wrote:
Package: jabber-irc
Version: 0.1cvs20050311-1
Severity: serious
Hi Alexey,
I was preparing to sponsor your upload of jabber-irc 0.1cvs20050420-1 to
fix RC bug #307734, but in the process, lintian spit out this error:
E: jabber-irc:
Hi
In response to Steve's message, I am happy to help where I can but
whether I'm of the 'right stuff', I can't say:
Experience (in brief):
Been running debian since spring 2003 (never run any other linux distro)
initially ppc (woody) and then i386 (on servers) as well. Started using
sid on my
Hello,
can someone please hint the new version of phpsysinfo to be included
into Sarge?
current Sarge version is 2.3-3, Sid version is 2.3-4. It was uploaded
with a medium urgency 6 days ago.
The change between the two versions is a fixed i18n template.
Kind regards
Frederik Schueler
--
also sprach Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.16.1251 +0200]:
Strengths: I can write and can usually work through problems to a
successful solution
Great!
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php
Pick a problem and go.
Weakness: No formal computer background (self-taught) and have big
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
gaim (1:1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=3Dhigh
.
* New upstream version. Fixes two remote DoS/overflow security bugs,
CAN-2005-1262 and CAN-2005-1261.
At 183272 lines, the diff between gaim 1.2.1 and 1.3.0 is too large for
me to review
also sprach Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.16.1530 +0200]:
I'd like to volunteer to help.
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php
Find whatever interests you and work on it. :)
If you are experienced with debconf and ucf, fai could use your
help: http://bugs.debian.org/309209
--
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.16.1540 +0200]:
I'd like to volunteer to help.
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php
Sorry, I had not read your message correctly. Ignore my blather.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin
Hi!
Please find attached for your convenience the interdiff of the .diff.gz
and the debdiff of the .deb between the version in sarge and sid. I
guess there is nothing really blocking its approval, the last buildd
binary is currently sitting in incoming and will be in the pool after
Hi,
I uploaded xosview 1.8.2-3 and 1.8.2-4 when the freeze was announced -
They fix four bugs (one minor, three normal): #130633, #183695,
#281565, #306715. The patches are very simple and localized, I am sure
they carry no ill side-efects - I am attaching a diff between the
version currently in
Package: clamsmtp
Version: 1.4-0
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge fixed
The upstream version of clamsmtp, 1.4.1, fixed a bug critical to the
usability of the clamsmtp package. The debian package (1.4.1-0) has
been in unstable for over 22 days and has had no further bugs
(including RC bugs) filed
Please review mnemo for sarge.
- Forwarded message from Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:32:20 -0400
To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Subject: Accepted mnemo 1.1-2.1 (all source)
Reply-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:57:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:56:22 -0700
Source: python-libgmail
Binary: python-libgmail
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.8+cvs20050208-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Sebastien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16-05-2005 08:37, Niko Tyni wrote:
Package: libgd-perl
Version: 1.41-13
Severity: important
Tags: sarge
The packages 'libgd-perl' and 'libgd-gd1-perl' are currently not in
sarge. They were dropped from testing earlier by the FTBFS bug
Hi Steve,
On Monday 16 May 2005 11:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
As in releases past, we strongly recommend that you read the release
notes before upgrading, and in particular Chapter 4, Upgrades from
previous releases, since some aspects of the recommended upgrade path
have changed. The
Please review this t-p-u upload..
- Forwarded message from Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:02:41 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Accepted gaim 1:1.2.1-1.1 (i386 source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I've just uploaded libotr1-2.0.2-1 which contains a security fix
(potential buffer overflow). Quoting the upstream author:
it's indeed a potential security issue for
apps that use libotr in a certain way. But it turns out gaim-otr
doesn't use it in that way, so it isn't affected. But other
Gentile ,
Grazie per aver contattato PayPal e per aver portato questa email
sospetta alla nostra attenzione.
Ti confermiamo che l'email che hai ricevuto non ti è stata inviata da
PayPal. Il sito web associato a questa email non risulta essere un URL
autorizzato né utilizzato in qualche modo da
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:03:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* libgd-noxpm-perl (built from exact same source) is in sarge.
Eh, why aren't both packages actually built from the same source package
then? If they are two variants of the same package, they should be built
from the same
Hi,
I read Steve Langasek's Call for upgrade testing announcement.
I was disappointed to see only one person volunteering.
If this work is open to users, I'm willing to volunteer for it.
I think I do am an experienced user.
Please let me know if I can be of any help to the Debian
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:03:26PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Changelog:
muddleftpd (1.3.13.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Change libmysqlclient-dev to libmysqlclient12-dev
Why not libmysqlclient14 ?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It
fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff
is included below).
There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues.
Approved.
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
can someone please hint the new version of phpsysinfo to be included
into Sarge?
Approved
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Please find attached for your convenience the interdiff of the .diff.gz
and the debdiff of the .deb between the version in sarge and sid. I
guess there is nothing really blocking its approval, the last buildd
binary is currently
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:02:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Please review mnemo for sarge.
Approved
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:13:41PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
I think it would be wise to update the sarge version (libotr1-2.0.1-1)
whenever possible.
Approved
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hello translators,
As things are heating up towards the release of Sarge, we are working to
finalize the Release Notes [1].
Currently a lot of translations are out-of-date. For obvious reasons, only
translations that are up-to-date can be published on the website and
maybe included on
I just uploaded gmailfs 0.4, which fixes #309259. It is a new
upstream version, but Sebastian, the maintainer, verified each line
of the diff and we were able to conclude that 0.4 fixes the RC bug
but does not add anything else. Please see the bug transcript for
the analysis.
Thus, please accept
Should we archive/close old/fixed upgrade and install reports or not?
There are reports over a year old and some that refer to closed bugs.
There are quite a few to close and archive.
Andrew Donnellan
volunteer report processor
--
Heritage Linux Group
http://www.heritagelinux.tk
Hi Andy,
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:01:16PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On 16.05.2005, at 11:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
We mentioned in the freeze announcement[1] that we needed
volunteers to
help with processing upgrade reports -- taking them apart, identifying
the bugs that
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:15:35AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I have (temporarily) disabled all translations except for EN, FR and NL in
order not to confuse users who want to test upgrades using the Release
Notes. When translations are updated, they will of course be added again.
That will
tag 307180 fixed
thanks
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:02:30PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
nag (1.1-3.1) unstable; urgency=HIGH
.
* NMU
* Applied patch from Frank Lichtenheld to fix XSS hole. (CAN-2005-1322)
Closes: #307180
you meant #307173, didn't
I've just uploaded tetex-base 2.0.2c-8 to unstable. It should go into
sarge for the following reason:
fixes RC bug #309008
The changes in this version are as listed in the changelog:
* Add documentation for the Sueterlin fonts (ancient german handwriting)
(closes: #300596) [frank]
*
tag 307173 fixed
thanks
Bah, I'll get the bug number right eventually..
Joey Hess wrote:
tag 307180 fixed
thanks
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:02:30PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
nag (1.1-3.1) unstable; urgency=HIGH
.
* NMU
* Applied patch from Frank
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:18:43AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
But ftp-master is not accepting files:
[...]
Uploading (ftp) to anonymous-ftp-master (ftp-master.debian.org)
[ Uploading job ntlmaps_0.9.9-2_i386
ntlmaps_0.9.9-2.dsc 0.6 kBdupload fatal error: Can't upload
ntlmaps_0.9.9-2.dsc:
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:33:24AM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
Should we archive/close old/fixed upgrade and install reports or not?
There are reports over a year old and some that refer to closed bugs.
There are quite a few to close and archive.
Yes, please go ahead and close
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 02:59 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:18:43AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
But ftp-master is not accepting files:
[...]
Uploading (ftp) to anonymous-ftp-master (ftp-master.debian.org)
[ Uploading job ntlmaps_0.9.9-2_i386
ntlmaps_0.9.9-2.dsc
Frans Pop wrote:
zh_TW 2003/01/04 1.134 ?
I had send an updated Translation Chinese translation for Sarge release
note several months ago.
Please visit http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2004/12/msg00060.html
for more details.
Please consider to apply this. Thanks.
--
To
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:34:57PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
apache2 2.0.54 contains some broken changes to util_ldap, causing apache
processes to hang and/or segfault, sometimes even when LDAP isn't in use.
This was reported in bug #307567, a fix was attempted in 2.0.54-3, however it
seemed
Hi Martin,
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:40:59PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
I'm currently fixing some important (and other) bugs in the postgresql
package, which I'd like to see in Sarge. I'll mail the details when
the package is ready, but so far I wanted to ask whether you would
accept the new
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:52:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Also, unlike the comment in the file claims, manual modificatons are
lost as soon as the package is reconfigured (or upgraded, I think):
I'm afraid that is not the case.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/joeycat
Hi Holger,
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:22:10PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
btw, #309209 (fai, serious policy violation) and solutions to it are
discussed
and worked on on the fai devel mailinglist currently...
Ok, great.
oh btw, the2nd: would you (the RMs...) still accept some more
46 matches
Mail list logo
