Re: Please approve gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-4 for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:11:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Sjoerd, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: I've just uploaded gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-4. Which fixes gnome bug 303470[0]. The result of this bug is that when gnome-vfs is used to copy

Offshore medical wholesale, Tadalafil

2005-05-18 Thread Jefferson
Viagra: save more buying more http://sdfnLgi.amb5.com/p/sevy/attain.htm Jefferson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: please accept gmailfs-0.4

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:32:33AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: I just uploaded gmailfs 0.4, which fixes #309259. It is a new upstream version, but Sebastian, the maintainer, verified each line of the diff and we were able to conclude that 0.4 fixes the RC bug but does not add anything else.

Re: please accept gmailfs-0.4

2005-05-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h Please consider accepting module-assistant 0.9 in Sarge. It mostly contains cosmetic fixes (manpage updates, new translation) and trivial changes for things that would beginn to bother me some months later, when Sarge is Stable. Changes attached below. Regards, Eduard.

documentation updates for keepalived

2005-05-18 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi, to deal with #305751 (which was formely release critical), I updated some docs in the package (README.Debian and the description). Please consider this updates for sarge to prevent confusions for our users. Best wishes Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Please push unzoo_4.4-4 into sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Thomas Schoepf
I uploaded unzoo_4.4-4 to unstable. It fixed the directory traversal bug described in Bug#306164. The applied patch can be cound here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/patch-306164.txt?bug=306164msg=20att=1 Please consider to push it into sarge. Thanks! Thomas -- 5 GB Mailbox, 50

initrd-tools reminder

2005-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
hello, initrd-tools 0.1.80 in svn seems to be in shape for your review vorlon. closes ppc rc bug + discussed fixes conncerning root device + resynchronise with ubuntu. thanks for your work. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: libmail-cclient-perl

2005-05-18 Thread Stephen Quinney
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:02:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:03:51PM +0100, Stephen Quinney wrote: Is there any chance of the libmail-cclient-perl package making it into Sarge please? The only thing holding it out previously was a lack of build on ia64 for

Re: please accept gmailfs-0.4

2005-05-18 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.18.0834 +0200]: Yes, approved. You rock. Thanks. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `-

Re: gnupg, t-prot and the release

2005-05-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Gerfried Fuchs: I was told that gnupg might be updated for sarge with the version from unstable. Please be aware that the gnupg version has changed some of its locale strings on which t-prot depends for doing its work. Huh? In this case, t-prot is fundamentally borken. It should use

x86info 1.13-3 for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Mark Brown
Please consider x86info 1.13-3 for sarge. This version supports amd64 by using GCC 3.4 for the build rather than the default compiler, adds appropriate build dependencies for that and also includes a spelling fix in the manual page that had previously been uploaded. The amd64 porters would

Re: Processing of upgrade reports

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Clemens, On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:58:40AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read the mail by Steve Langasek on Debian devel-announce. His remark concerning the processing of upgrade reports drew my attention. I would be happy to spend a little of my spare-time to help out in this

Re: NMU for libgcrypt11

2005-05-18 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! You wrote: I'm about to upload an NMU for libgcrypt11 to fix #306302. I simply removed config.sub and config.guess from debian/patches/build.patch Hmm, I haven't uploaded the NMU yet, as I noticed that the versions for sarge and sid aren't in sync for this package. Sarge has 1.2.0-4, sid

syslog-ng, #297190: having two syslogs running should be at least important

2005-05-18 Thread Peter Palfrader
severity 297190 important thanks syslog-ng does not stop the old instance on package upgrades, which results in two syslog-ngs running after an upgrade. I think this should be at least important, if not serious. release team, got an opinion on that? Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted |

Re: Accepted pcre3 4.5-1.2 (i386 source all)

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:55:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Please approve this new version (in t-p-u) of pcre3 in testing. Approved, pending the arrival of binaries for all archs. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Accepted tclx8.3 8.3.5-4.1 (i386 source all)

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:09:26PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Please approve the just uploaded tclx8.3 NMU in sarge. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Please approve harden-doc 3.2.4 for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
I have recently uploaded several different versions of the harden-doc package in order to a) reflect changes introduced in sarge which can affect the security of new installations b) update the different translations available Not all translations are up-to-date and at least one (German)

Please approve oinkmaster 1.2-1 into sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
As I stated in a previous e-mail oinkmaster 1.2-1 should be introduced into sarge 1.1-1 is not usable since the URLs it points to download Snort sources are not valid any longer (#305048) (9 days old) I don't plan to make a fix through t-p-u to specifically fix #305048, it's not worth my time and

Re-adding tulip to sarge ?

2005-05-18 Thread Yann Dirson
vorlon wrote: as of Thursday, the window is closed for [...] requests to re-add packages to sarge that weren't in woody. tulip is in this case - I would have asked earlier for its re-addition, should I have thought it had any chance to be accepted. I'd be grateful if it was possible. For some

Please hint proftpd-1.2.10-12

2005-05-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
This is my final sarge centered release for proftpd, changelog follow: proftpd (1.2.10-12) unstable; urgency=high * Added a patch 28.mod_ls.c to manage incorrect symlink following in recursive listing. That breaks old versions behavior and create problem to mirroring software. See

Please approve the 2.2.4 Nessus suite (nessus-core, nessus-plugins, libnasl, nessus-libraries) into sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Hi again, I would like to request the full Nessus 2.2.4 suite to be approved into sarge, even though this is a new upstream release from the one in sarge (2.2.3) the changes in this release are actually bug fixes, no new features are introduced (well, save for new attack plugins). If not

Re: Bug#308290: libgphoto2-2: fails to import avis from Canon IXUS IIs

2005-05-18 Thread Frederic Peters
This has been fixed in libgphoto2-2 2.1.5-6 (as well as a duplicate filed as 301945 against gphoto2). It has been built on every arch. Release team, this allows libgphoto2 to work correctly with sarge libusb version (in order to download big files, mostly movies now but with resolutions

Re: Please allow afterstep, dwww, whichman, man2html, and pdksh in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Robert, On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:12:23AM +0200, Robert Luberda wrote: dwww 1.9.20 --- 1.9.21 --- Quite important bug fix: quote search argument passed to apropos command not to display irrelevant results when the search argument contains spaces; and a few minor

Re: Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Pitt
tag 309591 sarge thanks Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 1:05 -0700]: apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by default: http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html This may or may not be a grave bug, but AFAIK it doesn't apply to

Freeze exceptions: parmetis, ccc, babel, illuminator; please be considerate to busy developers

2005-05-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, I'm writing to request freeze exceptions for the following packages: * parmetis: closes RC bug 308846 * ccc: closes 305897 (which should have been important since it directs users to the wrong website to download the software) and 283636 (i18n of debconf

Re: Please hint proftpd-1.2.10-12

2005-05-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:45:42PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: This is my final sarge centered release for proftpd, changelog follow: proftpd (1.2.10-12) unstable; urgency=high * Added a patch 28.mod_ls.c to manage incorrect symlink following in recursive listing. That

Re: Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 1:05 -0700]: apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by default: http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html This may or may not be a

postgreSQL and sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Daniel Cristian Cruz
Hi Debian Jedis... I'm an user of debian for some time, since the release of woody to be exactly. I develop proprietary aplications (sick, I would like to develop free software...) with postgreSQL, and it's hard to use a Debian stable server with the version of postgreSQL... Now that there is

Re: openscenegraph and libjpeg6b

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Bill, On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:21:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: I have NMUed openscenegraph 0.9.8-4.1 to fix a (slightly more than) potential FTBFS on the buildd. Patch and comment are in bug #303896. openscenegraph is up-to-date on all architectures. Would you approve it for sarge

Re: Accepted stone 2.2-2 (i386 source)

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:47:03PM -0400, Takuo KITAME wrote: Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:49:33 +0900 Source: stone Binary: stone Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2-2 Distribution: testing-proposed-updates Urgency: high Maintainer: Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please approve harden-doc 3.2.4 for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:21:46PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: I might upload a new version throughout the weekend, to reflect translation updates, but I'd rather have the current version (3.2.4) than the current one (3.2) for several reasons: Approved Gruesse, -- Frank

Re: postgreSQL and sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Andrew McMillan
Apologies for CC: to -release list, but I hope one opposing viewpoint is OK... On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 08:45 -0300, Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote: I develop proprietary aplications (sick, I would like to develop free software...) with postgreSQL, and it's hard to use a Debian stable server with

Re: Freeze exceptions: parmetis, ccc, babel, illuminator; please be considerate to busy developers

2005-05-18 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam C Powell IV wrote: Greetings, Hi Adam [...] I must say, as a Debian developer at a US university, I feel this freeze process has treated me very inconsiderately. We were told for about eight months that a freeze was on the way, which after

Re: documentation updates for keepalived

2005-05-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: to deal with #305751 (which was formely release critical), I updated some docs in the package (README.Debian and the description). Please consider this updates for sarge to prevent confusions for our users. Approved Gruesse,

Re: amule and gngeo package

2005-05-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:40:07PM +0200, Julien Delange wrote: I know, sarge is frozen, but I have 2 packages to upload in sarge. The first is important, it's amule, a p2p client which is very used. The last version has been released and I packaged it and fix all RC bugs. It compiles now on

Re: Freeze exceptions: parmetis, ccc, babel, illuminator; please be considerate to busy developers

2005-05-18 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 06:36:07AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: I must say, as a Debian developer at a US university, I feel this freeze process has treated me very inconsiderately. We were told for about eight months that a freeze was on the way, which after four, five, six and seven of

Re: RFI lletters and inquiry about torcs

2005-05-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:13:51AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: lletters: has one important fix on usability (#290680), and some other improvements that I'd like people to enjoy, hereby I request its inclusion on sarge. Hmm, I have really problems to even find the senseful patches in the autotool

Re: Need approval for uploading scim 1.0.2-3

2005-05-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:22:05PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote: Dear release managers, (Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.) I am planning to (have my sponsor) upload scim 1.0.2-3, which is mostly a documentation update, and adjusted dependency a little. My regular sponsor,

Re: Please push unzoo_4.4-4 into sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Joey Hess
Thomas Schoepf wrote: I uploaded unzoo_4.4-4 to unstable. It fixed the directory traversal bug described in Bug#306164. The applied patch can be cound here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/patch-306164.txt?bug=306164msg=20att=1 Please consider to push it into sarge.

Re: Please approve popularity-contest 1.28 to sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:51:16AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: Please approve popularity-contest 1.28 for sarge. Approve Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

getting inkscape 0.41-5 into sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Wolfram Quester
Hi alltogether, I am the maintainer of inkscape, a vector graphics program using svg. The version of inkscape in sarge is 0.41-2, Guido Günther did the upload of 0.41-5 to unstable some days ago. The changes between the two versions are a fix for a typo in the package description and fixes for

JSPWiki important bug fix version to Sarge?

2005-05-18 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
If you happen to have enough time, please consider allowing jspwiki 2.0.52-12 into Sarge. These are the relevant changelog and diff lines. The version -12 does not contain any changes, it simply fixes the incorrect upload of the version -11. jspwiki (2.0.52-12) unstable; urgency=high * The

Re: Pushing gksu (1.2.5-3), libgksu1.2 (1.2.6-2) and libgksuui1.0 (1.0.4-3)

2005-05-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:13:26PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Hello, I've uploaded all of the mentioned packages with basically translation updates. I've done most changes on the -2 revision for all of those packages, but had to upload a -3 for gksu and libgksuui1.0 because of last

mkinitrd-cd

2005-05-18 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Hi list, mkinitrd-cd 0.52 fixes quite some bugs and should really make it into sarge. The only reason why it hasn't propagated yet is an override disparity, which I intend to fix soon enough. However, no changes should be needed to 0.52, it is perfectly suitable for sarge. with best regards,

RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread sean finney
(please excuse the cross-posting, i felt it was necessary to get all affected parties' input) hi, for some time now, christian and i have been trying to build in a workaround for a rather tricky bug in the mysql-server and mysql-server-4.1 packages, and we'd like to field some comments on what

Re: Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 4:38 -0700]: I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy flash hardware and greatly speed up the

Re: Freeze exceptions: parmetis, ccc, babel, illuminator; please be considerate to busy developers

2005-05-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 13:43 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam C Powell IV wrote: Greetings, Hi Adam [...] I must say, as a Debian developer at a US university, I feel this freeze process has treated me very inconsiderately. We were told

lastest mc for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Ludovic Drolez
Hi ! The two last upload of mc [1] fixed a huge number of bugs including 3 important bugs which broke crucial features of mc. Actually unstable'mc is more stable that sarge's mc. Could mc 1:4.6.0-4.6.1-pre3-3 be put in sarge ? Cheers, -- Ludovic Drolez. [1]

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Quoting sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SNIP so at this point, we're not sure what to do to cover this last problem, as we have no guarantee the preinst of mysql-server-4.1 will even run before mysql-server/woody is removed. the only fix we can think of is to remove the two directories from the

Release Notes - non-us being phased out - please comment

2005-05-18 Thread Frans Pop
Prompted by Jeroen van Wolffelaar I propose to include the following text in the Release Notes to make users aware that non-us is being phased out. *non-us being phased out* For the sarge release most cryptographic packages that were formerly in the non-us part of the archive, have been moved

please accept module-assistant 0.9

2005-05-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h Please consider accepting module-assistant 0.9 in Sarge. It mostly contains cosmetic fixes (manpage updates, new translation) and trivial changes for things that would beginn to bother me some months later, when Sarge is Stable. Changes attached below. Regards, Eduard.

lletters diff

2005-05-18 Thread Rudy Godoy
Hi, regarding letters there was no patches to autotools files, but an adition of additional languages for gettext (fr and es). dnl Load gettext languages ALL_LINGUAS=nl fr es This also led to include those new ones on the clean target for Makefile.in on po dir. The huge diff is due upstream'

Please drop cairo libraries from sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Dave Beckett
The cairo libraries are undergoing a large API change and shipping them in a release would be a bad idea at this time. I'd request that they are removed from testing/sarge. The packages are: Source: libcairo binary: libcairo1 libcairo1-dev Source: libpixman binary: libpixman1

Re: Please drop cairo libraries from sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:32:08PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: The cairo libraries are undergoing a large API change and shipping them in a release would be a bad idea at this time. I'd request that they are removed from testing/sarge. The packages are: Source: libcairo binary:

Please approve vdr 1.2.6-13 for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Thomas Schmidt
Please consider vdr 1.2.6-13 for inclusion in sarge, it was uploaded on allmoast 2 weeks agon, but if forgot to ask about inclusion into sarge until now. It fixes an important bug, which is affecting amd64 users (the init-script would not work without modifications on amd64), the other changes

Just to be sure: will this upload be harmful?

2005-05-18 Thread Emanuele Rocca
First of all: thanks for your work. Before sponsoring this upload of somaplayer (which fixes RC bug #309093) I would like to know if there's something wrong with it; here it is the interdiff: diff -u somaplayer-0.5.2/debian/control somaplayer-0.5.2/debian/control ---

please accept zope-testcase 0.9.6

2005-05-18 Thread martin f krafft
Adrian Bunk's friendly reminders (#309691) led me to realise that zope-testcase had not propagated and does in fact use the non-free python-profiler package. Version 0.9.6 fixes this. Please let it in. I do note that 0.9.6 differs from 0.9.0 in upstream version, maintainer, and some patches to

Re: my watchdog package

2005-05-18 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Not really, as I've checked for the existance of the old link as well. If there is no S10watchdog the links are not removed. Don't you think this suffices? What if the user has changed their default runlevel to 3, and edited

FWD: Accepted cdebconf 0.74.2 (i386 source all)

2005-05-18 Thread Joey Hess
Please consider this t-p-u upload for sarge. Due to some mistakes we dropped the original 0.72 cdebconf sources from the archive, while keeping the debs in sarge. This is the best we could come up with to get the cdebconf sources in sarge in sync with the udebs we'll be using for the installer.

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread sean finney
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:00:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: 4 drop mysql-dfsg-4.1 from unstable/sarge not exactly an attractive option, but i guess everything is on the table at this point so it's worth bringing up... the reverse dependencies aren't nearly as severe as i had assumed, actually,

Uploaded new gnome-pim (1.4.9-2.2) fixes #247192

2005-05-18 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello, I just sponsored a NMU upload of gnome-pim (1.4.9-2.2) that fixes #247192. Since that is release critical, as per my understanding of the current freeze rules I'm notifying it to you. Thanks to Maurizio Lemmo for preparing this fix. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:23:35AM -0400, sean finney wrote: ... the following upgrade paths work: mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge - mysql-server-4.1/sarge but this does not: mysql-server/woody - mysql-server-4.1/sarge so at this point,

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello [1st issue - dpkg symlink bug workaround] On 2005-05-18 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Quoting sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SNIP so at this point, we're not sure what to do to cover this last problem, as we have no guarantee the preinst of mysql-server-4.1 will even run before

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Christian Hammers wrote: Hello [1st issue - dpkg symlink bug workaround] On 2005-05-18 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Quoting sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SNIP so at this point, we're not sure what to do to cover this last problem, as we have no guarantee the preinst of mysql-server-4.1

Bug#309686: tuxracer in sarge should really be replaced by the transition package to planetpenguin-racer

2005-05-18 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050518 22:20]: Package: tuxracer Version: 0.61-6.4 Severity: serious Tags: sarge This might technically not be a RC bug, but for not forgetting it: I don't see any reason for shipping sarge with the obsolete package in sarge instead of the

Re: Please consider scmxx_0.7.5-2 for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Michael, On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:49:53AM +0200, Debian maintainer wrote: Upstream of scmxx has made me aware of a quite severe bug on non-i386 arches: On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:54:13AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: I was made aware of a problem on PPC (reproduced on Sparc32) of SMS

Re: Please approve rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.10-1 for Sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:49:10AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: Version 2-unofficial-mt.10-1 of rng-tools fixes one critical usability bug, which causes rng-tools to *not* work out-of-the-box. It has other important documentation updates which will make my life that much easier

Please consider rcs 5.7-15 for sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Romain Francoise
It contains one small documentation change and mostly cleanups. The debdiff will appear large but it's because I removed a few extraneous files from the Debian diff (.orig files, etc) when I adopted it. Nothing release critical nor even important so I'll understand if you have better things to do