On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
Why not ship SARGE with unrar-nonfree and provide a
[...]
Maybe in ETCH.
[...]
SARGE $USER are using now unrar-nonfree and in
[...]
ETCH we can remove the virtual-package unrar.
[...]
It's Sarge, and Etch. Please don't
Hi, dash 0.5.2-5 in sid includes a Czech debconf translation since 17
days. It's the only change from 0.5.2-4 currently in sarge, and can
safely be updated in my opinion.
dash (0.5.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/po/cs.po: new; initial Czech debconf translation (closes:
#308043, thx
Hi,
please consider pushing exim4 4.50-8 from unstable into testing as a
last-minute update.
The package - again - fixes a huge number of documentation issues
which will hopefully help reducing the avalanche of bug reports we
expect after sarge's release.
After stripping all documentation fixes
On Sat, 28 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Dave,
Hi
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:39:03PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
It's 8 days old now so I guess in 2 days it'll be in testing
however it fixes RC bug on libpixman 309674 and indirectly helps
fix separate grave bug on oregano 309645
My name is Julie ;)
Most of the time very tired and don't want to go out.. idea came to me
to have my videos I made with my old boyfriend online ;p. My girlfriends want
to join me to on my website. -) All it needs is age verification..
Come check website I put together, I'm not that good tho
Hi,
please respect reply-to: - thanks.
On Sunday 29 May 2005 06:57, Steve Langasek wrote:
Thanks to some fancy last-minute archive work by James Troup, we now have a
solution that lets us get security-fixed kernels into sarge r0 (instead of
just into security.d.o) without running into GPL
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer I change in SANE instead of libusb, so that other
applications using libusb won't suffer to performance losses.
I strongly disagree. I know what I'm losing with libsane
fixed both bugs in -10, uploaded to unstable. It looks like other ruby
modules may be fail to build as well, the configury of ruby1.8 was
changed in ruby1.8-1.8.2-4.
Matthias
Kurt Roeckx writes:
Package: sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.35-9
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 08:58 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:39 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
I am the maintainer of the cairo libraries in debian and I have
recently made the request that they be removed from sarge as the API
Recai Oktas wrote:
I am about to make a new security upload (through my sponsor) for elog:
elog_2.5.7+r1558-3 against the testing-proposed-updates archive. The
new package fixes a buffer overflow[1] (which has no CVE id). For your
convenience, I attached the output from debdiff
On Thursday 26 May 2005 23:09, Steve Langasek wrote:
Looks like there's a new RC bug against the package that will need to be
fixed first.
The RC bug [1] was closed today, with the patch provided by the submiter, in
the package oregano version 0.40.0-5 uploaded by Jordi Mallach.
No other
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 10:47:27AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-7 for sarge. It fixes security vulnerability
CAN-2005-1260, RC bug #310803, and #293581.
Closes: 293581 310803
Changes:
bzip2 (1.0.2-7) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fixed CAN-2005-1260
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 05:00:14PM +0200, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Just uploaded dump_0.4b37-2, the only difference from -1 now in testing
is inclusion of an updated de.po. Feel free to include this in sarge if
you wish.
Approved, but at urgency=low, hopefully it won't have time to make it into
13 matches
Mail list logo
