Hi, I just uploaded a NMU of somaplayer, built against non-faulty libmad
and libid3tag, which if approved should go in Sarge.
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key
also sprach Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.01.0822 +0200]:
There is also a time bomb for people that installed Sarge/Testing in the
last months. apt-setup has created sources.list lines with testing
distribution in them.
WTF? debian's tools should really not use the canonical names,
Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a few hours ago, the Drupal project has released version 4.5.3, a
bugfix release which fixes a serious security bug. I have created and
just uploaded a 4.5.3-1 package to unstable. Updated Debconf
translations are the only additional changes over
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 07:48 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
As I said, this is a bug in a historical package, not a current one.
It _is_ current for the poor sods that use stable.
--
|=| Michael Piefel
|=| Member of the Debian project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I've patched ettercap to fix this bug #311615. The patch is filed in
the bug report, and example packages are here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ettercap/
I don't use ettercap myself, so I can't test it properly, though the
change
hey,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:56:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I would very much like to see this fixed for sarge, but it seems to now be
quie late in the evening EDT. Is this something that still has a chance of
being uploaded before tomorrow's dinstall?
crap... i didn't end up
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:34:07PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I've just uploaded the new raidtools2 1.00.4 package and it has been
accepted and will go into unstable today. Please approve it for
testing too.
This is a small transitional package to make the transition from
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:56:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I would very much like to see this fixed for sarge, but it seems to now be
quie late in the evening EDT. Is this something that still has a chance of
being uploaded before tomorrow's dinstall?
okay, i have something ready to go,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:33:37AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:56:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I would very much like to see this fixed for sarge, but it seems to now be
quie late in the evening EDT. Is this something that still has a chance of
being uploaded
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-02 06:28]:
How extensively has this upgrade path been exercised? I'm concerned that
since the transitional package doesn't include any logic for converting
existing configurations from raidtools2 to mdadm, it may be worse for users
than not having
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I stumbled across bug#308401 and checked if the other daemons I maintain
have same problem. They did, so I have now filed bugreports #311641,
#311642 and a still pending bugreport for pop-before-smtp.
I also uploaded new packages with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-06-2005 15:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: rpld
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 3.5
This package uses update-inetd, so must depend on netbase.
First of all, I see there is currently no mention of the release notes in
the README on the CDs.
I feel at least a direct link to the website should be included:
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes
Now for the real request. It would be nice if the release notes (html, pdf
and
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We
Hi,
there was already a request by Ardo
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01765.html) to take
the new version of debiandoc-sgml into Sarge.
Since the package was not uploaded at this time it seems it is not yet
approved.
debiandoc-sgml (1.1.88) unstable; urgency=high
*
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:54:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I've patched ettercap to fix this bug #311615. The patch is filed in
the bug report, and example packages are here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ettercap/
If anyone cares to review it and/or upload it, it's all yours, or
2005/6/2, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First of all, I see there is currently no mention of the release notes in
the README on the CDs.
I feel at least a direct link to the website should be included:
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes
If you do that, may it link to etch
Now for the real request. It would be nice if the release notes (html, pdf
and txt versions) could be included on the first CD, same as the
installation manual. There are 11 languages that qualify:
en, es, fr, de, cs, it, nl, pt_BR, ja, zh_CN, zh_TW
As for the manuals, we are currently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recai Oktas wrote:
http://l10n-turkish.alioth.debian.org/debian/clara_20031214-1.1_i386.deb
Single debs are not really useful. What we as DDs need are .diff.gz and
.dsc as the provide the actual patch. Currently we did not receive your
fix but only
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:07:28PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Now for the real request. It would be nice if the release notes (html, pdf
and txt versions) could be included on the first CD, same as the
installation manual. There are 11 languages that qualify:
en, es, fr,
Hi,
I just uploaded version 1.9-10 of xmltex. This version now really fixes the
RC bugs related to the names of the format files. Thanks to Don Amstrong
for providing the patches and to Roger Leigh for testing them (including on
an upgrade from woody).
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
Correct me if I'm wrong but these are based on the manuals provided by the
latest debian-installer-manual package and not on the latest SVN sources.
Am I right? Just curious, since there have been updates and improvements to
the english version of the manual, new translations have been made
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:47:33AM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but these are based on the manuals provided by the
latest debian-installer-manual package and not on the latest SVN sources.
Am I right? Just curious, since there have been updates and improvements
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:54:57PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
I just uploaded version 1.9-10 of xmltex. This version now really fixes the
RC bugs related to the names of the format files. Thanks to Don Amstrong
for providing the patches and to Roger Leigh for testing them (including
samba 3.0.14a-4 has been uploaded to the archive, fixing one RC security
bug and two recently-identified important bugs, and adding one build-dep to
address a question of build reproducibility. Please consider accepting this
upload into sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:16:00PM -0700, Ian Eure wrote:
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 04:54 pm, Hilko Bengen wrote:
Just a few hours ago, the Drupal project has released version 4.5.3, a
bugfix release which fixes a serious security bug. I have created and
just uploaded a 4.5.3-1 package to
26 matches
Mail list logo
