libsigc++-1.2 hint notes

I'm trying to get an NMU for glademm uploaded to remove the spurious build-dependencies. After that, I propose that libbonobouimm1.3 and libbonobomm1.3 be removed from unstable as they'll be totally unused. gtkglextmm should be removed from testing (bug #320577). It has no reverse

Re: mpich C++ transition status

On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:55:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Following up on the issues from my previous note that still exist. Sorry that I hadn't given this attention sooner; I've been a bit buried preparing for vacation. No worries. :) Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If the

first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.

This is a first pass at working out what needs to go in at once for KDE to get in. I think if these are tried together we can get a more meaningful result from update_output.txt. These are all roots of fairly substantial dependency trees, with some additional subtrees which probably need to go

[DRAFT] Another update on transition statuses

Release team -- please take this, edit it as you see fit, and post it to d-d-a if deemed appropriate. I made some fairly strong recommendations regarding the libssl fiasco, but I think they're correct -- and people probably ought to be warned about this immediately. -- We currently still have

Re: mpich C++ transition status

severity 333462 serious thanks Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:55:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: I've filed a bug against r-base for this. I'm going to file it at severity: important since I don't want the bug itself to block migration if hppa gets built

Re: mpich C++ transition status

On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:22:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration. Only one package still needs an upload: Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free) FWIW, clustalw-mpi has now been removed from testing due to the RC bug you filed on it previously.

Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.

Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And openssh-krb5 needs to be rebuilt for the same reason (kdeutils depends on it). Huh? Where are you seeing that? That makes no sense and absolutely should not be the case. Are you sure you're not just seeing output picking up one of multiple

Re: mpich C++ transition status

Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Going through the build problems on that list: Oh, sorry, and parmetis (non-free) needs a build on mips. I keep forgetting that one because it doesn't show up on the buildd report for some reason, only in the update-excuses output. -- Russ Allbery

Re: libsigc++-1.2 hint notes

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:44:01AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I'm trying to get an NMU for glademm uploaded to remove the spurious build-dependencies. After that, I propose that libbonobouimm1.3 and libbonobomm1.3 be removed from unstable as they'll be totally unused. That would need to

Re[2]: News

Breaking news alert issue - big news coming. Allixon International Corporation A X C P . P K We give it to you again as a gift. This company is doing incredible things. They have cash and have made great strategic aquisitions. Current price is $4.70. Short term projection is $8. This company

Re: mpich C++ transition status

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:08:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:22:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration. Only one package still needs an upload: Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free) FWIW, clustalw-mpi has now

Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

Hi, Can you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing? Thanks Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: clarifications on bjorn.haxx.se (continued)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luk Claes wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 04:41:00PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Luk Claes wrote: Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: [...] Further investigations lead me to

Re: clarifications on bjorn.haxx.se (continued)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:45:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Thanks for adding them. Is it ok to keep sending mails about these? Sure. You can also /msg them to me on IRC which is maybe faster and certainly less stuff in the list archive which is only of minor interest... Another one: easy

Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.

* Russ Allbery [Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:10:06 -0700]: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And openssh-krb5 needs to be rebuilt for the same reason (kdeutils depends on it). Huh? Where are you seeing that? That makes no sense and absolutely should not be the case. Are you sure

Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:38:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: DO NOT upload packages built against libssl-dev or libssl0.9.8. All packages should be built against libssl0.9.7-dev (libssl0.9.7) at this time. I intend to drop the libssl0.9.7-dev package in the next upload, which I hope to

Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kurt Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:38:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: DO NOT upload packages built against libssl-dev or libssl0.9.8. All packages should be built against libssl0.9.7-dev (libssl0.9.7) at this time. I

Fwd: news

Breaking news alert issue - big news coming. Allixon International Corporation A X C P . P K We give it to you again as a gift. This company is doing incredible things. They have cash and have made great strategic aquisitions. Current price is $4.70. Short term projection is $8. This company

Re: mpich C++ transition status

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:44:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: scalapack failed on powerpc with: /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib/libf2c.a(lread.o)(.got2+0xbc): unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol `f__units' /usr/bin/ld: