* Matthias Klose:
Does it change the internal representation of std::string, or some
other template instantiation provided by libstdc++?
I don't see a change to the internal representation of std::string,
I'm forwarding this upstream.
std::string seems to be fine because the instance is
Greetings,
Can someone please clarify what's going on here?
* On November 1, I uploaded petsc-2.3.0-1_i386.changes.
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing number of packages and naming convention as a
reason.
* I gave the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Hi
Can someone please clarify what's going on here?
* On November 1, I uploaded petsc-2.3.0-1_i386.changes.
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing
So if I'm not mistaken, these are the current release blockers
(based on http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html)
There's also a fair amount of testing progression necessary of course.
Have I got this about right?
* releaseable binutils in unstable (necessary for
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
can we start working on 1.33.1 ? or do you want to make some intermediary
release ?
i don't see any good reason to make any new upload to unstable until new
gcc 4.0 upload. and even when new gcc 4.0 is uploaded, we
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:22 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Hi
Can someone please clarify what's going on here?
* On November 1, I uploaded petsc-2.3.0-1_i386.changes.
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:22 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Hi
[...]
What gives? Is this sufficient justification for rejecting a
lintian-clean package?
[...]
I think the REJECT-FAQ [1] will
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
As you could see in my message, I did ask Joerg again, but with no reply
for a week, so nobody but Joerg knows what I did or didn't convince him
of.
Well, I'm not Joerg, but based on the evidence of rejects/accepts and my
understanding of policy and actual practices, it
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:36:30PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* releaseable glibc in unstable (likewise)
This should be done now.
There is a substantial glibc upgrade on the horizon, but I told Steve
yesterday that we have no plans to do it until this one has reached
testing and gotten
On 10473 March 1977, Adam C. Powell, IV wrote:
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing number of packages and naming convention as a
reason.
* I gave the reason for my naming convention and number of
packages.
* He
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 21:32 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10473 March 1977, Adam C. Powell, IV wrote:
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing number of packages and naming convention as a
reason.
* I gave the reason for my
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 20:56 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
As you could see in my message, I did ask Joerg again, but with no reply
for a week, so nobody but Joerg knows what I did or didn't convince him
of.
Well, I'm not Joerg, but based on the evidence of
I have a question:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:17:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
* Rename and Rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for
these packages should be in any case c2a (instead of c2). No
new suffix is needed when the soname changes in a new upstream
upload.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:39:06PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
I have a question:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:17:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
* Rename and Rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for
these packages should be in any case c2a (instead of c2). No
new suffix
* Nathanael Nerode:
* removal of non-free docs etc. from all packages
IIRC, the release goal is to release without GNU FDL documentation
only, not to remove all non-free documentation. At least I'm not
aware of a coordinated effort in that direction.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
[redirecting this to -devel; discussions of ftp team NEW queue policies are
off-topic for -release.]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:13:47PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
And thats what I asked for, yes. Drop the version from -dev|-dbg|-doc,
use the shlib system for the rest (which makes
16 matches
Mail list logo
